Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
6001 Orting WA 9 20 42 $8K
6002 Seatac WA 10 23 55 $8K
6003 Waterford township MI 6 13 31 $8K
6004 Ruleville MS 6 2 6 $8K
6005 Youngsville LA 5 3 6 $8K
6006 Moorpark CA 11 25 23 $8K
6007 Bridgeport WA 5 9 15 $8K
6008 Levittown NY 18 7 23 $8K
6009 Nolensville TN 12 26 70 $8K
6010 Silver city NM 6 4 11 $8K
6011 Swansea MA 5 8 8 $8K
6012 St helens OR 9 18 43 $8K
6013 Dighton MA 5 9 11 $8K
6014 Erie MI 5 9 18 $8K
6015 Painted post NY 17 41 75 $8K
6016 Moundsville WV 6 5 5 $8K
6017 Ortonville MI 8 9 19 $8K
6018 Robards KY 6 16 10 $8K
6019 Eden NC 11 14 28 $8K
6020 Centerville UT 12 10 11 $8K
6021 Gautier MS 13 4 7 $8K
6022 Glen head NY 11 8 22 $8K
6023 Munford TN 11 17 94 $8K
6024 Barnwell SC 6 4 9 $8K
6025 Sutter creek CA 8 30 31 $8K
6026 Mc donald PA 5 6 7 $8K
6027 Morgan city LA 10 7 7 $8K
6028 Bushnell FL 5 6 5 $8K
6029 Hill air force base UT 5 36 113 $8K
6030 Milford NY 6 19 66 $8K
6031 New city NY 18 25 75 $8K
6032 Nogales AZ 27 30 62 $7K
6033 Candler NC 7 9 16 $7K
6034 Belchertown MA 6 10 6 $7K
6035 La mesa CA 10 6 16 $7K
6036 Westmoreland NY 6 14 42 $7K
6037 Johnson VT 5 10 18 $7K
6038 Ocoee FL 19 13 7 $7K
6039 Colleyville TX 20 4 10 $7K
6040 Hickam afb HI 7 19 25 $7K
6041 West boylston MA 7 6 4 $7K
6042 Joshua TX 7 4 6 $7K
6043 Culver city CA 14 6 16 $7K
6044 Fort leonard wood MO 9 4 20 $7K
6045 Pine plains NY 6 12 42 $7K
6046 Davidson NC 8 8 11 $7K
6047 Lumberton TX 5 2 5 $7K
6048 Coeymans NY 5 15 34 $7K
6049 Mocksville NC 11 12 43 $7K
6050 Arroyo PR 9 24 41 $7K
6051 Union springs NY 14 30 78 $7K
6052 Belhaven NC 5 13 8 $7K
6053 Freeland MI 14 36 34 $7K
6054 Shoreline WA 8 11 14 $7K
6055 Phoenix NY 26 71 141 $7K
6056 Red hook NY 6 12 51 $7K
6057 Wilsonville OR 30 65 83 $7K
6058 Angola IN 6 2 5 $7K
6059 Cooper landing AK 5 8 4 $7K
6060 Vienna WV 13 4 13 $7K
6061 Villa park IL 26 14 11 $7K
6062 Summerdale AL 6 3 13 $7K
6063 Comerio PR 7 12 18 $7K
6064 Franklin NC 9 9 17 $7K
6065 Pine hill NJ 5 13 47 $7K
6066 Pomeroy WA 5 13 13 $7K
6067 Spirit lake IA 5 4 2 $7K
6068 Amherst MA 11 20 10 $7K
6069 Benson AZ 12 23 18 $7K
6070 Estacada OR 10 17 66 $7K
6071 Caldwell KS 8 16 5 $7K
6072 La grange NC 5 4 12 $7K
6073 Adjuntas PR 12 18 31 $7K
6074 Epping NH 9 7 18 $7K
6075 Williamson NY 11 21 26 $7K
6076 Mt pleasant MI 7 17 61 $7K
6077 Lajas PR 16 29 46 $7K
6078 York SC 11 8 10 $7K
6079 Clarkdale AZ 7 14 31 $7K
6080 Dumas TX 7 2 2 $7K
6081 Franklin LA 5 2 3 $7K
6082 Hillburn NY 6 10 29 $7K
6083 Huntington station NY 31 4 16 $7K
6084 Laplace LA 6 2 1 $7K
6085 Stony brook NY 23 45 57 $7K
6086 Succasunna NJ 7 2 1 $7K
6087 Taylorsville KY 5 2 2 $7K
6088 Tremont IL 14 31 55 $7K
6089 Myrtle creek OR 7 18 48 $7K
6090 Iola KS 6 9 2 $7K
6091 Havana FL 7 4 5 $7K
6092 Arkadelphia AR 5 2 6 $7K
6093 Tellico plains TN 7 14 58 $7K
6094 Fort oglethorpe GA 5 4 9 $7K
6095 Schofield barracks HI 7 11 9 $7K
6096 Hammondsport NY 9 20 57 $7K
6097 Loretto TN 6 15 80 $7K
6098 Commerce TX 5 4 5 $7K
6099 Pelahatchie MS 8 10 5 $7K
6100 Rosemount MN 11 20 23 $7K
← Previous Page 61 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.