Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5901 Pittsford NY 6 10 14 $8K
5902 Glennallen AK 5 12 67 $8K
5903 Millbrae CA 10 8 12 $8K
5904 Chino valley AZ 5 12 49 $8K
5905 Cheney WA 5 14 15 $8K
5906 Glen cove NY 15 7 27 $8K
5907 New era MI 5 7 15 $8K
5908 Keesler afb MS 6 4 2 $8K
5909 Perry OH 6 6 33 $8K
5910 Edgewood MD 8 2 19 $8K
5911 Simpsonville SC 27 16 27 $8K
5912 Liberty lake WA 7 12 22 $8K
5913 Coral gables FL 10 15 8 $8K
5914 Rochester MI 31 12 29 $8K
5915 Edmonds WA 16 28 72 $8K
5916 Lafayette CA 6 3 5 $8K
5917 Culver city CA 14 6 16 $8K
5918 Bassett VA 9 18 54 $8K
5919 Lindsborg KS 5 8 8 $8K
5920 Orondo WA 5 12 22 $8K
5921 White pine TN 7 14 44 $8K
5922 Briarcliff manor NY 11 17 41 $8K
5923 Minnetonka MN 11 21 13 $8K
5924 Zebulon NC 6 6 41 $8K
5925 Gatesville TX 12 4 10 $8K
5926 Buckeye AZ 13 10 8 $8K
5927 Ellensburg WA 26 59 89 $8K
5928 East ridge TN 5 10 41 $8K
5929 Orting WA 9 20 42 $8K
5930 Seatac WA 10 23 55 $8K
5931 Waterford township MI 6 13 31 $8K
5932 Ruleville MS 6 2 6 $8K
5933 Youngsville LA 5 3 6 $8K
5934 Bridgeport WA 5 9 15 $8K
5935 Levittown NY 18 7 23 $8K
5936 Nolensville TN 12 26 70 $8K
5937 Silver city NM 6 4 11 $8K
5938 Swansea MA 5 8 8 $8K
5939 Lock haven PA 9 12 4 $8K
5940 St helens OR 9 18 43 $8K
5941 Alturas CA 9 23 41 $8K
5942 Westfield IN 7 6 23 $8K
5943 Dighton MA 5 8 11 $8K
5944 Erie MI 5 8 18 $8K
5945 Painted post NY 17 41 75 $8K
5946 Moundsville WV 6 5 5 $8K
5947 Ortonville MI 8 9 19 $8K
5948 Robards KY 6 16 10 $8K
5949 Eden NC 11 14 28 $8K
5950 Centerville UT 12 10 11 $8K
5951 Gautier MS 13 4 7 $8K
5952 Glen head NY 11 8 22 $8K
5953 Munford TN 11 17 94 $8K
5954 Barnwell SC 6 4 9 $8K
5955 Morgan city LA 10 7 7 $8K
5956 Great neck NY 44 40 128 $8K
5957 Hill air force base UT 5 36 113 $8K
5958 Milford NY 5 16 42 $8K
5959 New city NY 18 25 75 $8K
5960 Nogales AZ 27 30 62 $7K
5961 Candler NC 7 9 16 $7K
5962 Belchertown MA 6 10 6 $7K
5963 Westmoreland NY 6 14 42 $7K
5964 Johnson VT 5 10 18 $7K
5965 Ocoee FL 18 11 7 $7K
5966 Colleyville TX 20 4 10 $7K
5967 Hickam afb HI 7 19 25 $7K
5968 West boylston MA 6 4 4 $7K
5969 Joshua TX 7 4 6 $7K
5970 Fort leonard wood MO 9 4 20 $7K
5971 Pine plains NY 6 12 42 $7K
5972 Davidson NC 8 8 11 $7K
5973 Lumberton TX 5 2 5 $7K
5974 Coeymans NY 5 15 34 $7K
5975 Mocksville NC 11 12 43 $7K
5976 Arroyo PR 9 24 41 $7K
5977 Union springs NY 14 30 78 $7K
5978 Belhaven NC 5 13 8 $7K
5979 Freeland MI 14 36 34 $7K
5980 Shoreline WA 8 11 14 $7K
5981 Red hook NY 6 12 51 $7K
5982 Wilsonville OR 30 65 83 $7K
5983 Angola IN 6 2 5 $7K
5984 Vienna WV 13 4 13 $7K
5985 Parrish FL 7 2 3 $7K
5986 Villa park IL 26 14 11 $7K
5987 Summerdale AL 6 3 13 $7K
5988 Comerio PR 7 12 18 $7K
5989 Franklin NC 9 9 17 $7K
5990 Pine hill NJ 5 13 47 $7K
5991 Spirit lake IA 5 4 2 $7K
5992 Amherst MA 11 19 10 $7K
5993 Benson AZ 12 23 18 $7K
5994 Estacada OR 10 17 66 $7K
5995 Caldwell KS 8 16 5 $7K
5996 La grange NC 5 4 12 $7K
5997 Adjuntas PR 12 18 31 $7K
5998 Epping NH 9 7 18 $7K
5999 Williamson NY 11 21 26 $7K
6000 Mt pleasant MI 7 17 61 $7K
← Previous Page 60 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.