Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5901 Dedham MA 14 10 16 $9K
5902 Mebane NC 13 16 15 $9K
5903 Lewiston NY 19 34 98 $9K
5904 Monterey TN 11 23 42 $9K
5905 Muncy PA 8 12 16 $9K
5906 Newaygo MI 11 22 23 $9K
5907 Reston VA 44 10 4 $9K
5908 Alliance NE 5 4 5 $9K
5909 Mendota heights MN 5 8 17 $9K
5910 Gordonsville VA 6 15 25 $9K
5911 Shoreview MN 5 11 26 $9K
5912 Diberville MS 13 6 4 $9K
5913 Espanola NM 5 2 6 $9K
5914 Harmon GU 7 7 20 $9K
5915 Roanoke rapids NC 5 6 8 $9K
5916 Yorktown heights NY 8 15 52 $9K
5917 Snowmass village CO 5 4 6 $9K
5918 Waite park MN 10 20 37 $9K
5919 Darby PA 8 2 1 $9K
5920 Jeannette PA 12 14 8 $9K
5921 Monterey CA 19 28 38 $9K
5922 Hailey ID 6 2 3 $9K
5923 Chesilhurst NJ 5 9 23 $9K
5924 Protection KS 5 10 7 $9K
5925 Bracey VA 5 10 30 $9K
5926 Summerville SC 40 19 25 $9K
5927 Upper darby PA 12 2 3 $9K
5928 West salem WI 5 7 2 $9K
5929 Circle pines MN 6 12 16 $9K
5930 Bruceton mills WV 7 11 18 $9K
5931 Bridgehampton NY 5 9 14 $9K
5932 Greenfield CA 6 7 18 $9K
5933 Bethpage NY 17 18 44 $9K
5934 Robbinsville NC 5 9 8 $9K
5935 Clarks summit PA 10 7 4 $9K
5936 Brocton NY 9 27 54 $9K
5937 Agana GU 8 15 19 $9K
5938 Naval base GU 5 10 13 $9K
5939 Moscow ID 14 22 6 $9K
5940 Hastings MN 14 18 21 $9K
5941 Saint rose LA 8 4 3 $9K
5942 Ocotillo CA 6 34 39 $9K
5943 Sutton WV 5 3 9 $9K
5944 Broken bow NE 5 4 2 $9K
5945 Burien WA 6 10 19 $9K
5946 Lyons IL 7 5 21 $8K
5947 Tarboro NC 7 8 14 $8K
5948 Four oaks NC 11 10 25 $8K
5949 Warsaw VA 13 33 126 $8K
5950 Lanai city HI 6 10 16 $8K
5951 Rumson NJ 5 12 42 $8K
5952 Le grand CA 10 31 27 $8K
5953 Berne IN 6 6 26 $8K
5954 Graham TX 14 3 6 $8K
5955 Pleasant hill CA 14 13 13 $8K
5956 East rochester NY 6 15 31 $8K
5957 Portales NM 10 10 37 $8K
5958 Tawas city MI 5 11 23 $8K
5959 Corydon IN 5 7 4 $8K
5960 Paynesville MN 5 8 17 $8K
5961 Sierra vista AZ 18 20 25 $8K
5962 Indianola MS 20 8 3 $8K
5963 Duncan SC 12 11 31 $8K
5964 El campo TX 15 8 6 $8K
5965 Mountain home TN 8 19 21 $8K
5966 Roseville MN 16 24 24 $8K
5967 Fort buchanan PR 21 41 40 $8K
5968 Wexford PA 17 8 9 $8K
5969 Hohenwald TN 10 20 94 $8K
5970 Hancock NY 11 34 88 $8K
5971 Pittsford NY 6 14 25 $8K
5972 Sheldon IA 6 4 7 $8K
5973 Glennallen AK 6 14 67 $8K
5974 Millbrae CA 10 8 12 $8K
5975 Chino valley AZ 5 12 49 $8K
5976 Cheney WA 5 14 15 $8K
5977 Glen cove NY 15 7 27 $8K
5978 New era MI 5 7 15 $8K
5979 Shepherdsville KY 11 10 7 $8K
5980 Keesler afb MS 6 4 2 $8K
5981 Perry OH 6 6 33 $8K
5982 Edgewood MD 8 2 19 $8K
5983 Simpsonville SC 27 16 27 $8K
5984 Liberty lake WA 7 12 22 $8K
5985 Coral gables FL 10 15 8 $8K
5986 Rochester MI 31 12 29 $8K
5987 Edmonds WA 16 28 72 $8K
5988 Lafayette CA 6 3 5 $8K
5989 Bassett VA 9 18 54 $8K
5990 Lindsborg KS 5 8 8 $8K
5991 Orondo WA 5 12 22 $8K
5992 White pine TN 7 14 44 $8K
5993 Briarcliff manor NY 11 17 41 $8K
5994 Minnetonka MN 11 21 13 $8K
5995 Zebulon NC 6 6 41 $8K
5996 Gatesville TX 12 4 10 $8K
5997 Buckeye AZ 13 10 8 $8K
5998 Iron river MI 7 13 35 $8K
5999 Ellensburg WA 26 59 89 $8K
6000 East ridge TN 5 10 41 $8K
← Previous Page 60 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.