Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5801 Selah WA 9 13 12 $9K
5802 Whitesboro NY 9 24 42 $9K
5803 Carlsbad NM 25 32 29 $9K
5804 Ingleside TX 9 8 4 $9K
5805 Clinton SC 5 5 22 $9K
5806 North plains OR 9 19 39 $9K
5807 Stone ridge NY 7 23 46 $9K
5808 North hills CA 12 8 7 $9K
5809 Cherryvale KS 6 10 21 $9K
5810 Baxter TN 7 10 37 $9K
5811 Drain OR 7 19 37 $9K
5812 Mahopac NY 9 16 39 $9K
5813 Poteau OK 6 4 8 $9K
5814 Raymond NH 8 6 15 $9K
5815 Benton IL 5 7 12 $9K
5816 Greenville NC 51 39 37 $9K
5817 Aitkin MN 5 11 25 $9K
5818 Bow WA 7 15 17 $9K
5819 Forestville NY 8 18 53 $9K
5820 Waseca MN 9 16 28 $9K
5821 Finksburg MD 5 6 23 $9K
5822 Burbank WA 5 2 12 $9K
5823 Dundee FL 7 6 8 $9K
5824 Mount airy NC 20 28 60 $9K
5825 Hormigueros PR 24 40 40 $9K
5826 Clinton MS 17 8 13 $9K
5827 Parma ID 6 4 3 $9K
5828 Panorama city CA 14 7 17 $9K
5829 French camp CA 14 33 53 $9K
5830 Dedham MA 14 10 16 $9K
5831 Mebane NC 13 16 15 $9K
5832 Lewiston NY 17 29 76 $9K
5833 Monterey TN 11 23 37 $9K
5834 Muncy PA 8 12 16 $9K
5835 Newaygo MI 11 21 23 $9K
5836 Reston VA 43 10 4 $9K
5837 Alliance NE 5 4 5 $9K
5838 Mendota heights MN 5 8 17 $9K
5839 Gordonsville VA 6 15 25 $9K
5840 Shoreview MN 5 11 26 $9K
5841 Diberville MS 13 6 4 $9K
5842 Espanola NM 5 2 6 $9K
5843 Harmon GU 7 7 20 $9K
5844 Roanoke rapids NC 5 6 8 $9K
5845 Yorktown heights NY 8 15 52 $9K
5846 Snowmass village CO 5 4 6 $9K
5847 Waite park MN 10 20 37 $9K
5848 Darby PA 8 2 1 $9K
5849 Jeannette PA 11 12 8 $9K
5850 Monterey CA 19 28 38 $9K
5851 Hailey ID 6 2 3 $9K
5852 Chesilhurst NJ 5 9 23 $9K
5853 Lawrenceburg KY 6 5 8 $9K
5854 Protection KS 5 10 7 $9K
5855 Summerville SC 39 19 25 $9K
5856 West salem WI 5 7 2 $9K
5857 Circle pines MN 6 12 16 $9K
5858 Bruceton mills WV 7 11 18 $9K
5859 Bridgehampton NY 5 9 14 $9K
5860 Greenfield CA 5 7 18 $9K
5861 Bethpage NY 16 16 42 $9K
5862 Robbinsville NC 5 9 8 $9K
5863 Clarks summit PA 10 7 4 $9K
5864 Brocton NY 9 26 54 $9K
5865 Agana GU 8 15 19 $9K
5866 Naval base GU 5 10 13 $9K
5867 Moscow ID 14 22 6 $9K
5868 Hastings MN 14 18 21 $9K
5869 San juan capistrano CA 20 21 18 $9K
5870 Saint rose LA 8 4 3 $9K
5871 Ocotillo CA 6 34 39 $9K
5872 Broken bow NE 5 4 2 $9K
5873 Burien WA 6 10 19 $9K
5874 La puente CA 32 10 19 $9K
5875 Lyons IL 7 5 21 $8K
5876 Tarboro NC 7 8 14 $8K
5877 Four oaks NC 11 10 25 $8K
5878 Warsaw VA 13 33 126 $8K
5879 Lanai city HI 6 10 16 $8K
5880 Rumson NJ 5 12 42 $8K
5881 Le grand CA 10 30 27 $8K
5882 Berne IN 6 6 26 $8K
5883 Graham TX 14 3 6 $8K
5884 Pleasant hill CA 12 13 13 $8K
5885 East rochester NY 6 15 31 $8K
5886 Portales NM 10 10 37 $8K
5887 Tawas city MI 5 11 23 $8K
5888 Corydon IN 5 7 4 $8K
5889 Paynesville MN 5 8 17 $8K
5890 Crown point IN 12 7 15 $8K
5891 Sierra vista AZ 18 20 25 $8K
5892 Indianola MS 20 8 3 $8K
5893 Duncan SC 12 11 31 $8K
5894 El campo TX 15 8 6 $8K
5895 Mountain home TN 8 19 21 $8K
5896 Roseville MN 16 24 24 $8K
5897 Fort buchanan PR 21 41 40 $8K
5898 Wexford PA 17 8 9 $8K
5899 Hohenwald TN 10 20 94 $8K
5900 Hancock NY 11 34 88 $8K
← Previous Page 59 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.