Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
901 Jackson MI 126 269 697 $318K
902 Van nuys CA 53 67 150 $317K
903 Portsmouth NH 68 90 162 $317K
904 West jefferson OH 13 31 56 $316K
905 Kernersville NC 31 52 166 $315K
906 Vallejo CA 53 92 166 $315K
907 Waycross GA 18 21 112 $315K
908 Mccarran NV 40 140 278 $315K
909 Bath ME 11 25 83 $315K
910 Wyoming MI 76 164 580 $314K
911 Channelview TX 26 34 92 $314K
912 East rutherford NJ 30 61 165 $314K
913 Wilmington NC 142 116 477 $313K
914 Milford CT 40 76 322 $313K
915 Hillside IL 15 29 110 $313K
916 Canton GA 46 62 188 $313K
917 Catoosa OK 21 22 118 $313K
918 Newark OH 21 36 99 $312K
919 Boulder CO 69 108 170 $312K
920 Tiffin OH 13 41 87 $311K
921 Grand junction CO 80 90 204 $311K
922 New holland PA 15 26 95 $310K
923 Grafton WI 11 29 74 $310K
924 Brattleboro VT 31 62 122 $310K
925 Urbana OH 24 42 112 $310K
926 Prattville AL 26 43 104 $309K
927 Kaukauna WI 19 52 108 $309K
928 Poplar bluff MO 38 60 101 $309K
929 Mayaguez PR 171 408 549 $309K
930 Saint marys OH 9 24 73 $309K
931 Rancho cordova CA 48 81 187 $309K
932 Mount joy PA 23 53 108 $309K
933 Flushing NY 95 164 229 $309K
934 Somerville NJ 19 32 146 $308K
935 Fairfield CA 56 105 167 $308K
936 Corcoran CA 31 107 128 $308K
937 West chicago IL 29 63 94 $307K
938 Cedar grove NJ 11 26 106 $307K
939 Daytona beach FL 118 140 193 $306K
940 Jeffersonville IN 31 61 177 $306K
941 Norwood MA 51 52 98 $306K
942 Ripon WI 11 38 102 $305K
943 Uniontown OH 7 11 18 $305K
944 Escanaba MI 54 129 393 $305K
945 Bayville NJ 13 22 70 $305K
946 Lowell MA 47 57 165 $304K
947 Flowood MS 45 39 70 $304K
948 Fort smith AR 96 66 163 $304K
949 Howell MI 101 233 521 $304K
950 Caldwell NJ 12 25 66 $304K
951 Wallingford CT 42 72 277 $304K
952 Lexington KY 137 143 162 $304K
953 Pewaukee WI 25 27 66 $304K
954 Gadsden AL 28 67 124 $303K
955 Davenport FL 21 23 29 $303K
956 Ormond beach FL 54 80 118 $303K
957 Rothschild WI 13 37 106 $302K
958 Livingston CA 37 153 158 $302K
959 Weatherford TX 38 27 55 $302K
960 Newark CA 28 50 96 $302K
961 Plainfield NJ 42 64 272 $301K
962 West bend WI 18 42 168 $301K
963 Luling TX 6 10 93 $301K
964 Freeport TX 14 36 82 $301K
965 Joplin MO 69 70 120 $301K
966 Boulder city NV 43 103 415 $301K
967 Duluth GA 63 66 148 $301K
968 Brundidge AL 9 18 64 $301K
969 Morgantown WV 73 77 110 $300K
970 Boonton NJ 13 25 90 $300K
971 Thermal CA 44 107 192 $300K
972 Valdosta GA 45 73 159 $299K
973 Gallatin TN 31 66 366 $299K
974 Watertown CT 20 55 244 $298K
975 New berlin WI 35 71 160 $297K
976 Roseville CA 82 147 170 $297K
977 Gilroy CA 48 95 193 $297K
978 El dorado AR 23 17 52 $297K
979 Braintree MA 44 67 119 $297K
980 Cary IL 12 27 92 $297K
981 Defiance OH 21 36 89 $296K
982 Fitzgerald GA 21 43 106 $296K
983 Bucyrus OH 14 33 99 $296K
984 Skokie IL 48 81 219 $296K
985 Meriden CT 36 100 341 $296K
986 Texarkana AR 21 14 31 $295K
987 Orrville OH 16 33 112 $295K
988 Pleasantville NJ 18 54 171 $295K
989 Homestead FL 78 61 157 $295K
990 Greencastle PA 16 30 64 $295K
991 Edwardsville IL 48 90 132 $295K
992 Hanover park IL 7 3 15 $295K
993 Jessup MD 57 97 434 $295K
994 Southgate MI 22 30 75 $295K
995 Ferndale MI 42 94 565 $294K
996 Woodbridge NJ 26 32 90 $294K
997 Hudson NH 34 54 144 $294K
998 Plymouth meeting PA 12 13 47 $293K
999 Marshfield WI 21 41 128 $293K
1000 Petaluma CA 43 72 139 $293K
← Previous Page 10 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.