Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3501 Redmond WA 42 59 126 $60K
3502 Fernandina beach FL 18 22 25 $60K
3503 Dayton TX 8 10 20 $60K
3504 Manati PR 44 95 113 $60K
3505 Hamburg NJ 10 18 58 $60K
3506 Rothbury MI 5 16 76 $60K
3507 Mukwonago WI 6 9 54 $60K
3508 Delavan WI 8 16 25 $60K
3509 Blaine WA 24 61 133 $60K
3510 Coeur d alene ID 66 81 86 $60K
3511 Saint simons island GA 9 9 22 $60K
3512 Thorp WI 7 17 52 $60K
3513 Newark NY 35 93 272 $60K
3514 Weaverville CA 7 20 28 $60K
3515 Mooresville NC 63 46 75 $60K
3516 Elberta AL 7 8 37 $60K
3517 Boardman OH 5 5 10 $60K
3518 Grapevine TX 41 21 34 $60K
3519 Buckhannon WV 18 18 24 $60K
3520 Huntley IL 10 22 48 $60K
3521 Maryville TN 30 34 142 $60K
3522 Belle chasse LA 19 18 45 $60K
3523 Audubon NJ 6 9 39 $60K
3524 Elkhorn WI 7 8 23 $59K
3525 Smyrna DE 14 21 34 $59K
3526 Charlotte amalie VI 33 139 189 $59K
3527 Alexandria LA 33 22 25 $59K
3528 Zion IL 10 15 41 $59K
3529 Pitman NJ 5 12 46 $59K
3530 Seaford DE 6 11 30 $59K
3531 York ME 14 12 26 $59K
3532 Marion IA 25 19 44 $59K
3533 North wildwood NJ 7 16 49 $59K
3534 Lakewood WA 51 78 237 $59K
3535 Eureka IL 7 16 55 $59K
3536 Goldendale WA 6 17 42 $59K
3537 Hinesville GA 30 23 24 $59K
3538 Nashville IL 5 13 25 $59K
3539 Brielle NJ 9 16 44 $59K
3540 Amana IA 5 13 27 $59K
3541 Hubbard OH 9 5 26 $59K
3542 Cedar park TX 41 23 32 $59K
3543 Richmond IL 5 16 36 $59K
3544 Whitestone NY 12 20 45 $59K
3545 Tremonton UT 8 31 30 $59K
3546 Mc kees rocks PA 11 24 37 $59K
3547 Troy MO 8 17 30 $59K
3548 Danville CA 11 12 19 $59K
3549 Pineville NC 18 33 85 $58K
3550 Nederland TX 7 3 31 $58K
3551 Tipton CA 11 24 38 $58K
3552 Fountain valley CA 27 15 35 $58K
3553 Tarpon springs FL 32 15 42 $58K
3554 Umatilla FL 6 5 26 $58K
3555 Dade city FL 10 11 32 $58K
3556 Jurupa valley CA 13 25 40 $58K
3557 Eldridge IA 7 16 52 $58K
3558 San ramon CA 32 27 28 $58K
3559 Gastonia NC 82 119 220 $58K
3560 Santa paula CA 12 26 59 $58K
3561 Bar harbor ME 16 11 18 $58K
3562 Parlier CA 8 18 27 $58K
3563 Harlan IA 5 8 15 $58K
3564 Gibsonton FL 8 11 16 $58K
3565 Lawrenceville NJ 7 19 86 $58K
3566 Montrose CO 20 24 42 $58K
3567 Berkley MI 7 10 50 $58K
3568 Hilmar CA 10 36 29 $58K
3569 Columbia PA 9 18 38 $58K
3570 Oneonta NY 35 73 158 $58K
3571 Three rivers TX 10 8 24 $58K
3572 Dover TN 23 56 85 $58K
3573 Levittown PA 25 29 70 $58K
3574 O fallon IL 14 23 31 $58K
3575 Lexington MA 16 21 41 $58K
3576 Pleasanton TX 11 10 17 $58K
3577 Butte MT 23 48 54 $57K
3578 Nephi UT 12 26 77 $57K
3579 Hallandale beach FL 5 6 45 $57K
3580 Barceloneta PR 34 79 84 $57K
3581 Ripon CA 26 58 47 $57K
3582 Mount shasta CA 14 20 32 $57K
3583 Morton MS 10 14 23 $57K
3584 Peachtree corners GA 14 2 26 $57K
3585 Dulles VA 6 14 42 $57K
3586 Haines city FL 19 15 14 $57K
3587 Rockland ME 12 22 28 $57K
3588 Yazoo city MS 11 16 39 $57K
3589 Pineville LA 12 10 21 $57K
3590 Windermere FL 6 7 20 $57K
3591 Elliston VA 7 17 69 $57K
3592 Rifle CO 14 12 41 $57K
3593 Oak harbor WA 57 129 212 $57K
3594 Deerfield IL 14 6 19 $57K
3595 Brooklyn OH 6 11 34 $57K
3596 Milford MA 15 17 30 $57K
3597 Berkeley heights NJ 12 20 41 $57K
3598 Wanchese NC 6 12 39 $57K
3599 Union beach NJ 7 20 42 $57K
3600 Madison TN 25 44 183 $57K
← Previous Page 36 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.