Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3601 Wethersfield CT 15 28 150 $57K
3602 Webster NY 19 35 62 $57K
3603 Little ferry NJ 12 16 48 $57K
3604 Randleman NC 5 14 75 $57K
3605 Pelham NY 11 24 81 $56K
3606 Reidsville NC 23 24 106 $56K
3607 Woodland WA 22 49 216 $56K
3608 Clare MI 21 32 110 $56K
3609 Petoskey MI 45 78 158 $56K
3610 Stilwell OK 6 4 11 $56K
3611 Quincy MI 6 28 85 $56K
3612 Emerson NJ 5 12 48 $56K
3613 Island heights NJ 6 16 48 $56K
3614 Laurinburg NC 13 14 101 $56K
3615 Woodcliff lake NJ 5 14 16 $56K
3616 Chester MD 10 22 103 $56K
3617 Catskill NY 20 47 150 $56K
3618 Loxley AL 15 18 31 $56K
3619 Mc gregor TX 8 9 31 $56K
3620 Henderson NC 16 19 71 $56K
3621 North chicago IL 10 33 68 $56K
3622 Oakdale CA 21 54 42 $56K
3623 Fulshear TX 7 12 26 $56K
3624 Montclair CA 17 20 77 $56K
3625 Buffalo MN 13 22 82 $56K
3626 Rogers MN 18 37 82 $56K
3627 Ishpeming MI 17 35 106 $56K
3628 Los molinos CA 8 24 14 $56K
3629 Oviedo FL 20 15 13 $56K
3630 Palmer MA 10 16 30 $56K
3631 Eutaw AL 8 8 29 $56K
3632 Coralville IA 23 16 41 $55K
3633 Long beach WA 6 17 98 $55K
3634 Prospect CT 8 22 90 $55K
3635 Calexico CA 20 27 89 $55K
3636 Wharton TX 8 17 37 $55K
3637 Sinking spring PA 6 15 41 $55K
3638 Magnolia NJ 5 9 43 $55K
3639 Aberdeen NC 8 7 94 $55K
3640 Bristol TN 41 70 219 $55K
3641 Kingsford MI 21 44 135 $55K
3642 Somersworth NH 11 12 20 $55K
3643 Chalmette LA 17 15 18 $55K
3644 Parachute CO 8 14 30 $55K
3645 Yaphank NY 14 19 55 $55K
3646 Starkville MS 23 26 23 $55K
3647 Hartsdale NY 11 13 48 $55K
3648 Lewisburg PA 13 27 42 $55K
3649 Midland park NJ 5 6 32 $55K
3650 Citrus heights CA 20 18 23 $55K
3651 Kenilworth NJ 19 23 42 $55K
3652 Bedford VA 23 46 77 $55K
3653 Richmond IN 12 14 59 $55K
3654 Fridley MN 27 56 112 $55K
3655 Douglassville PA 6 13 29 $55K
3656 Brentwood NY 23 19 55 $55K
3657 Irvington AL 9 13 39 $55K
3658 Lutherville MD 10 22 89 $55K
3659 Randolph MA 16 22 34 $55K
3660 Fulton MO 16 28 38 $55K
3661 Harrison AR 11 9 13 $55K
3662 Quincy MA 35 29 46 $55K
3663 Moriarty NM 6 4 13 $55K
3664 Fairport NY 27 45 107 $55K
3665 Littleton NH 9 13 18 $55K
3666 Jacksonville IL 19 40 121 $55K
3667 Batesburg SC 5 6 25 $55K
3668 Mount pleasant PA 10 22 62 $54K
3669 Georgetown IL 11 23 71 $54K
3670 Zephyrhills FL 24 20 22 $54K
3671 Frankfort NY 13 37 109 $54K
3672 Hillsboro TX 11 14 29 $54K
3673 Clio MI 9 14 64 $54K
3674 Swansea IL 9 21 26 $54K
3675 Great meadows NJ 6 16 42 $54K
3676 East grand forks MN 5 7 37 $54K
3677 Front royal VA 11 14 22 $54K
3678 Wayne PA 14 8 11 $54K
3679 Cockeysville MD 25 33 127 $54K
3680 Cassville MO 10 11 35 $54K
3681 Walled lake MI 19 29 140 $54K
3682 Manahawkin NJ 8 12 31 $54K
3683 Danville AR 7 12 19 $54K
3684 Red lion PA 8 16 34 $54K
3685 Kirkwood MO 6 15 11 $54K
3686 Clementon NJ 10 10 38 $54K
3687 Murray KY 15 11 15 $54K
3688 Litchfield MI 7 22 118 $54K
3689 New lebanon NY 6 15 51 $54K
3690 Newberry SC 14 21 63 $54K
3691 Denham springs LA 24 24 28 $54K
3692 Healdsburg CA 18 32 28 $54K
3693 Nutley NJ 17 16 38 $54K
3694 North providence RI 14 20 27 $54K
3695 Old forge PA 5 10 25 $54K
3696 Roanoke IL 9 19 75 $54K
3697 Clarinda IA 15 24 60 $54K
3698 Seymour CT 12 34 135 $53K
3699 Malta NY 17 44 44 $53K
3700 Brady TX 10 4 24 $53K
← Previous Page 37 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.