Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3401 Le roy NY 14 28 66 $64K
3402 Harrison township MI 11 24 73 $64K
3403 Trafford PA 9 15 35 $64K
3404 Grandville MI 35 61 165 $64K
3405 Portland MI 11 24 43 $64K
3406 Uniondale NY 30 45 104 $64K
3407 Columbia MD 52 61 202 $64K
3408 South haven MI 29 48 200 $63K
3409 Harper woods MI 13 14 54 $63K
3410 Pendleton OR 40 87 78 $63K
3411 Hawesville KY 6 39 37 $63K
3412 Warm springs OR 17 51 98 $63K
3413 Andrews TX 15 18 21 $63K
3414 North olmsted OH 7 6 9 $63K
3415 Park ridge NJ 7 11 52 $63K
3416 Grain valley MO 12 17 36 $63K
3417 Millersville MD 12 25 120 $63K
3418 Lake geneva WI 10 12 19 $63K
3419 Pompton plains NJ 7 13 27 $63K
3420 Dracut MA 11 14 30 $63K
3421 Kennett MO 13 14 31 $63K
3422 Bountiful UT 19 23 71 $63K
3423 Edgewater FL 11 24 30 $63K
3424 Rockville MD 76 86 330 $63K
3425 Saint clair MO 7 11 36 $63K
3426 Weymouth MA 21 39 46 $63K
3427 Aston PA 10 10 35 $63K
3428 Milton WV 10 16 39 $63K
3429 Sauk village IL 7 18 23 $63K
3430 Homer city PA 5 12 25 $63K
3431 Shelton WA 29 64 168 $63K
3432 West creek NJ 7 15 50 $63K
3433 Beltsville MD 40 29 130 $63K
3434 Cranberry township PA 34 43 61 $63K
3435 Dresden TN 14 33 172 $63K
3436 Northampton PA 16 34 69 $63K
3437 Cornelia GA 8 12 21 $63K
3438 Jayuya PR 11 23 34 $63K
3439 Melissa TX 7 6 19 $63K
3440 American fork UT 31 35 66 $63K
3441 Addison TX 30 8 35 $63K
3442 Chester PA 19 19 42 $62K
3443 Port isabel TX 8 6 34 $62K
3444 Arlington WA 27 50 163 $62K
3445 Greenwich CT 26 48 169 $62K
3446 Louisville MS 9 12 27 $62K
3447 Lake delton WI 5 6 5 $62K
3448 Trujillo alto PR 27 46 62 $62K
3449 Newport NH 11 12 39 $62K
3450 Ciales PR 12 41 56 $62K
3451 Frankfort KY 24 31 38 $62K
3452 Trenton OH 5 10 20 $62K
3453 Gilbert AZ 86 62 126 $62K
3454 Bullard TX 8 8 21 $62K
3455 West long branch NJ 6 13 39 $62K
3456 Colonial heights VA 38 57 95 $62K
3457 Spanish springs NV 8 17 23 $62K
3458 South bend IN 77 62 72 $62K
3459 Charlestown MA 15 29 57 $62K
3460 Maitland FL 13 14 11 $62K
3461 Houston MO 5 9 12 $62K
3462 Ludlow MA 8 16 30 $62K
3463 Dorchester MA 21 24 63 $62K
3464 Farmington ME 9 22 65 $62K
3465 Dundee MI 22 61 150 $62K
3466 Waverly NE 7 16 29 $62K
3467 Ashland WI 9 13 56 $61K
3468 Smithfield RI 20 22 38 $61K
3469 Westbury NY 63 43 113 $61K
3470 Airway heights WA 9 22 65 $61K
3471 Mount vernon IN 9 19 44 $61K
3472 Herriman UT 19 43 52 $61K
3473 Edinburg VA 9 16 63 $61K
3474 West berlin NJ 9 12 74 $61K
3475 Ludlow VT 7 19 31 $61K
3476 Ontario NY 17 53 105 $61K
3477 Merritt island FL 10 11 11 $61K
3478 Pulaski VA 24 55 104 $61K
3479 La junta CO 7 13 33 $61K
3480 Huntersville NC 32 30 46 $61K
3481 Burney CA 6 21 34 $61K
3482 Somerset WI 6 13 34 $61K
3483 Allendale MI 13 19 57 $61K
3484 Annapolis MD 49 77 315 $61K
3485 Port byron NY 17 55 125 $61K
3486 Cape charles VA 13 27 123 $61K
3487 Fresno TX 5 8 20 $61K
3488 Brazil IN 6 11 22 $61K
3489 Morganton NC 32 55 134 $60K
3490 Norton OH 5 12 45 $60K
3491 Kalkaska MI 22 46 100 $60K
3492 Chelsea MI 17 42 158 $60K
3493 Mountain pass CA 5 19 49 $60K
3494 Elkridge MD 26 40 200 $60K
3495 Vincentown NJ 12 12 41 $60K
3496 Contoocook NH 5 11 45 $60K
3497 Jesup GA 10 20 52 $60K
3498 Winston GA 8 12 57 $60K
3499 Glendale AZ 76 46 115 $60K
3500 Harvard IL 7 13 46 $60K
← Previous Page 35 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.