Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2701 De smet SD 5 6 50 $92K
2702 College park GA 12 35 52 $92K
2703 Midland MI 70 164 264 $92K
2704 White river junction VT 18 35 65 $92K
2705 Buffalo MO 8 10 23 $92K
2706 Mars PA 15 24 43 $92K
2707 Murrieta CA 33 40 46 $92K
2708 Celina OH 6 11 27 $92K
2709 Cutchogue NY 11 6 42 $92K
2710 Bonney lake WA 28 57 165 $92K
2711 Rainbow city AL 10 13 56 $92K
2712 Scott city MO 8 15 44 $92K
2713 Clarendon hills IL 6 9 22 $92K
2714 Glade spring VA 6 17 47 $92K
2715 Okarche OK 5 7 21 $92K
2716 Westminster CO 34 42 42 $92K
2717 Andover NJ 7 7 38 $91K
2718 Troy PA 12 15 56 $91K
2719 Garfield NJ 20 33 128 $91K
2720 Blasdell NY 7 14 38 $91K
2721 Westampton NJ 12 24 47 $91K
2722 Lake mary FL 26 26 29 $91K
2723 Richardson TX 82 29 41 $91K
2724 New kensington PA 23 45 125 $91K
2725 Crosswicks NJ 5 13 44 $91K
2726 Carneys point NJ 9 25 96 $91K
2727 Lake buena vista FL 8 36 21 $91K
2728 Minoa NY 5 11 15 $91K
2729 Clifton park NY 32 43 71 $91K
2730 San rafael CA 28 24 37 $91K
2731 Yankton SD 14 18 50 $91K
2732 Culpeper VA 15 12 20 $91K
2733 Mecca CA 25 73 43 $91K
2734 Del rio TX 20 15 47 $91K
2735 Palmerton PA 7 18 61 $91K
2736 Santee CA 19 23 41 $91K
2737 Greenwood MS 20 20 87 $91K
2738 Ione CA 20 67 84 $91K
2739 Conneaut lake PA 7 13 28 $91K
2740 Shelbyville TN 40 82 253 $91K
2741 Cheboygan MI 12 37 125 $91K
2742 Union city TN 26 60 247 $91K
2743 Schulenburg TX 5 16 41 $90K
2744 Fairview NJ 15 30 85 $90K
2745 Westfield NJ 13 20 82 $90K
2746 Astoria OR 38 80 190 $90K
2747 Torrington WY 7 10 60 $90K
2748 Milpitas CA 37 33 77 $90K
2749 Manteno IL 8 18 21 $90K
2750 Winona MS 11 19 41 $90K
2751 Easthampton MA 7 10 26 $90K
2752 Milton VT 15 24 89 $90K
2753 Pigeon forge TN 40 31 99 $90K
2754 Rancho mirage CA 6 12 30 $90K
2755 Amherst NY 47 80 105 $90K
2756 Fajardo PR 28 70 118 $90K
2757 Five points CA 9 18 22 $90K
2758 Northwood OH 11 20 39 $90K
2759 Turtle creek PA 7 21 52 $90K
2760 Utica MI 34 29 146 $90K
2761 Moundville AL 6 11 36 $89K
2762 Oconto falls WI 5 9 19 $89K
2763 Euless TX 32 21 49 $89K
2764 Dallas PA 6 12 22 $89K
2765 Westmont IL 21 17 51 $89K
2766 Salisbury MA 6 11 37 $89K
2767 Orchard park NY 31 57 132 $89K
2768 Naknek AK 9 25 55 $89K
2769 Poway CA 18 17 51 $89K
2770 Nitro WV 13 20 65 $89K
2771 Jefferson OH 5 11 23 $89K
2772 Denton TX 65 37 39 $89K
2773 Northfield VT 8 17 40 $89K
2774 Montevallo AL 7 4 25 $89K
2775 Sanford NC 29 20 110 $89K
2776 Shorewood IL 8 16 33 $89K
2777 Warwick NY 14 26 117 $89K
2778 Waupun WI 5 10 48 $89K
2779 Stroudsburg PA 17 22 67 $89K
2780 Oxford CT 9 30 118 $89K
2781 Heavener OK 5 5 25 $89K
2782 Walton hills OH 9 19 50 $89K
2783 Shasta lake CA 19 42 39 $89K
2784 Plainville CT 15 28 81 $88K
2785 Wells ME 9 15 21 $88K
2786 Archbald PA 9 14 25 $88K
2787 Cresskill NJ 9 12 86 $88K
2788 Champlain NY 8 16 59 $88K
2789 Seabrook NH 12 20 30 $88K
2790 Long beach NY 19 29 108 $88K
2791 Fort walton beach FL 44 28 95 $88K
2792 Humboldt IA 11 21 106 $88K
2793 Raritan NJ 6 11 56 $88K
2794 Shelby OH 8 16 39 $88K
2795 Metuchen NJ 16 18 91 $88K
2796 Gainesville TX 16 19 58 $88K
2797 Hudson MA 17 19 90 $88K
2798 Shippenville PA 10 29 58 $88K
2799 Elma NY 19 38 86 $88K
2800 Lindon UT 29 53 151 $87K
← Previous Page 28 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.