Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2601 Norton shores MI 17 46 151 $100K
2602 Fort irwin CA 34 50 76 $100K
2603 Cedar springs MI 20 37 122 $100K
2604 Tolland CT 7 28 81 $100K
2605 Roca NE 6 6 36 $100K
2606 Oak forest IL 20 31 56 $100K
2607 Fairborn OH 12 14 27 $100K
2608 Versailles OH 6 16 56 $100K
2609 Westlake OH 22 16 34 $100K
2610 Paris TX 13 9 11 $100K
2611 Lafayette CO 18 29 102 $100K
2612 Alpine CA 7 14 35 $100K
2613 Bedford heights OH 6 13 77 $100K
2614 College point NY 25 42 82 $100K
2615 Beach haven NJ 20 33 82 $100K
2616 Hazlet NJ 8 15 55 $100K
2617 Jonesville MI 13 36 82 $100K
2618 South easton MA 13 17 49 $99K
2619 Morrow GA 27 34 46 $99K
2620 Willows CA 17 44 62 $99K
2621 North fort myers FL 17 17 41 $99K
2622 West chester PA 26 19 29 $99K
2623 Forsyth GA 13 10 51 $99K
2624 Apple valley CA 26 64 113 $99K
2625 Donna TX 19 13 39 $99K
2626 Novi MI 59 81 303 $99K
2627 Rockledge FL 22 26 46 $99K
2628 Cherokee AL 6 21 31 $99K
2629 Brooklawn NJ 7 24 91 $99K
2630 Payson UT 24 42 75 $99K
2631 Fredonia KS 8 13 18 $99K
2632 Litchfield IL 14 22 56 $99K
2633 Kinnelon NJ 6 16 49 $99K
2634 Sapulpa OK 22 19 60 $99K
2635 Allen park MI 25 41 57 $99K
2636 Keller TX 26 17 37 $99K
2637 Beverly MA 16 21 68 $98K
2638 Johnstown OH 15 23 60 $98K
2639 Peshtigo WI 5 11 46 $98K
2640 Eagle river AK 16 35 75 $98K
2641 Livingston MT 7 17 42 $98K
2642 Peru IL 7 12 19 $98K
2643 Guayanilla PR 18 30 64 $98K
2644 Keasbey NJ 10 27 27 $98K
2645 Baraboo WI 9 11 49 $98K
2646 Gillett WI 5 6 38 $98K
2647 Woodbridge VA 71 37 87 $98K
2648 Red bank NJ 15 20 54 $98K
2649 Fort scott KS 14 20 35 $97K
2650 Darien CT 12 26 108 $97K
2651 Cedarburg WI 12 23 32 $97K
2652 Scotia NY 20 56 102 $97K
2653 Caledonia MI 35 64 176 $97K
2654 Hillsboro OH 9 17 81 $97K
2655 Guilford CT 10 29 67 $97K
2656 Norco CA 14 17 27 $97K
2657 Ione CA 21 70 89 $97K
2658 Logan OH 11 17 66 $97K
2659 Helena MT 40 62 79 $96K
2660 Jean NV 7 18 86 $96K
2661 New york mills NY 7 21 83 $96K
2662 Storm lake IA 10 25 87 $96K
2663 Centerville IA 9 13 61 $96K
2664 Eatontown NJ 20 26 93 $96K
2665 Lakeside CA 18 44 55 $96K
2666 Manteno IL 10 22 22 $96K
2667 Colusa CA 7 18 27 $96K
2668 Saint henry OH 6 15 29 $96K
2669 Searcy AR 31 12 23 $96K
2670 Amherst NY 50 87 113 $96K
2671 Seabrook NJ 8 19 84 $96K
2672 Medina NY 22 52 163 $96K
2673 Milpitas CA 39 35 84 $96K
2674 Oxford FL 5 4 8 $95K
2675 Belfast ME 15 29 65 $95K
2676 Harahan LA 17 32 48 $95K
2677 Fayette MS 9 5 58 $95K
2678 Lavon TX 5 13 27 $95K
2679 Rio grande PR 31 48 115 $95K
2680 San pablo CA 10 19 31 $95K
2681 Blairstown NJ 7 22 68 $95K
2682 Fajardo PR 28 70 122 $95K
2683 Moundridge KS 6 12 40 $95K
2684 Norwich CT 12 26 84 $95K
2685 Westminster MD 36 83 405 $95K
2686 Bloomsbury NJ 5 11 47 $95K
2687 Dorado PR 27 57 92 $95K
2688 West covina CA 38 45 26 $95K
2689 Titusville PA 13 27 112 $95K
2690 Crete NE 10 31 24 $95K
2691 Newport VT 8 20 41 $95K
2692 Woodward OK 9 4 58 $95K
2693 Teterboro NJ 14 37 82 $95K
2694 Black river falls WI 13 21 56 $95K
2695 Montrose PA 11 14 23 $95K
2696 Wenatchee WA 62 134 216 $95K
2697 Farmington NM 28 32 81 $95K
2698 Schertz TX 29 21 85 $94K
2699 Camden TN 26 72 325 $94K
2700 Devens MA 7 17 13 $94K
← Previous Page 27 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.