Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2501 Downey CA 21 18 42 $104K
2502 Palm bay FL 17 15 53 $104K
2503 Lake orion MI 26 45 133 $104K
2504 West bridgewater MA 14 27 51 $104K
2505 Hopkinsville KY 18 25 58 $104K
2506 Eagle grove IA 7 26 46 $104K
2507 Mount juliet TN 43 66 158 $104K
2508 Chagrin falls OH 16 13 47 $104K
2509 Aspen CO 53 25 50 $104K
2510 Lombard IL 28 54 86 $104K
2511 Torrington CT 26 49 139 $104K
2512 Spotswood NJ 6 9 52 $104K
2513 Pratt KS 18 28 56 $104K
2514 Lahaina HI 28 26 92 $104K
2515 Folcroft PA 7 10 39 $104K
2516 Shelby twp MI 14 46 315 $104K
2517 Maywood NJ 10 23 71 $103K
2518 Prescott WI 5 9 47 $103K
2519 Wahiawa HI 23 32 76 $103K
2520 Picayune MS 13 10 34 $103K
2521 Broussard LA 15 22 32 $103K
2522 Little chute WI 8 17 40 $103K
2523 Woodstock IL 16 24 53 $103K
2524 Bellingham WA 136 300 756 $103K
2525 Hanover township PA 6 14 42 $103K
2526 Leavenworth KS 28 33 65 $103K
2527 Avenal CA 11 38 26 $103K
2528 Merrimack NH 28 36 45 $103K
2529 La grange IL 27 28 60 $103K
2530 Corinth NY 7 15 30 $103K
2531 Forest MS 8 13 46 $103K
2532 Aberdeen NJ 8 10 41 $102K
2533 Monmouth IL 7 27 40 $102K
2534 Towanda PA 8 13 30 $102K
2535 Saint johnsbury VT 17 25 46 $102K
2536 Somerset MA 17 31 65 $102K
2537 Evansville WI 5 12 29 $102K
2538 Etna OH 5 10 15 $102K
2539 Sutton MA 11 18 48 $102K
2540 Avon NY 9 24 77 $102K
2541 Fitchburg MA 22 29 87 $102K
2542 Hayward WI 12 23 70 $102K
2543 Stanton CA 10 13 31 $102K
2544 Colchester VT 27 31 94 $102K
2545 Winter park FL 40 18 53 $102K
2546 Cranford NJ 11 25 64 $102K
2547 Corsicana TX 29 16 61 $102K
2548 Fort knox KY 23 46 83 $102K
2549 Owensboro KY 46 69 97 $102K
2550 Bowie MD 21 34 194 $102K
2551 Tempe AZ 137 117 325 $102K
2552 Libertyville IL 24 29 45 $101K
2553 Lehighton PA 10 20 61 $101K
2554 Effingham IL 17 31 60 $101K
2555 Center line MI 9 22 116 $101K
2556 Avon CT 11 31 116 $101K
2557 Lowville NY 19 59 189 $101K
2558 Sullivan MO 12 21 152 $100K
2559 Midlothian VA 61 68 106 $100K
2560 Fort irwin CA 34 50 76 $100K
2561 Tolland CT 7 28 81 $100K
2562 Roca NE 6 6 36 $100K
2563 Oak forest IL 20 31 56 $100K
2564 Fairborn OH 12 14 27 $100K
2565 Versailles OH 6 16 56 $100K
2566 Westlake OH 21 16 34 $100K
2567 Paris TX 13 9 11 $100K
2568 Norton VA 5 9 39 $100K
2569 Sterling IL 17 33 58 $100K
2570 Lafayette CO 18 29 102 $100K
2571 Alpine CA 7 14 35 $100K
2572 Bedford heights OH 6 13 77 $100K
2573 College point NY 25 42 82 $100K
2574 Lansdale PA 15 27 50 $100K
2575 Hazlet NJ 8 15 55 $100K
2576 Ephrata PA 16 29 77 $100K
2577 South easton MA 13 17 49 $99K
2578 Morrow GA 27 33 46 $99K
2579 Jonesville MI 12 33 81 $99K
2580 West chester PA 26 19 29 $99K
2581 Apple valley CA 26 64 113 $99K
2582 Donna TX 19 13 39 $99K
2583 Rockledge FL 21 24 46 $99K
2584 Oak park MI 33 49 237 $99K
2585 Cherokee AL 6 21 31 $99K
2586 Sunnyvale CA 49 46 53 $99K
2587 Flat rock MI 11 20 89 $99K
2588 Brooklawn NJ 7 24 91 $99K
2589 Payson UT 24 42 75 $99K
2590 Fredonia KS 8 13 18 $99K
2591 Litchfield IL 13 20 56 $99K
2592 Kinnelon NJ 6 16 49 $99K
2593 Sapulpa OK 22 19 60 $99K
2594 Keller TX 26 17 37 $99K
2595 Beverly MA 16 21 68 $98K
2596 Roswell NM 43 64 78 $98K
2597 Peshtigo WI 5 11 46 $98K
2598 Delafield WI 8 20 49 $98K
2599 Sheboygan falls WI 6 15 40 $98K
2600 East stroudsburg PA 15 23 58 $98K
← Previous Page 26 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.