Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2501 Brooklet GA 7 13 61 $106K
2502 Dahlonega GA 14 13 57 $106K
2503 Kenvil NJ 5 6 27 $106K
2504 Torrington CT 27 51 142 $106K
2505 Shawnee OK 24 30 45 $106K
2506 Philippi WV 5 9 25 $106K
2507 Abilene KS 14 20 53 $106K
2508 Owosso MI 34 87 216 $106K
2509 Riceboro GA 7 23 47 $106K
2510 Eatonton GA 10 10 46 $106K
2511 Galion OH 7 13 40 $105K
2512 Winsted CT 12 41 257 $105K
2513 East stroudsburg PA 15 23 60 $105K
2514 Delhi NY 20 49 136 $105K
2515 Huntingdon valley PA 16 37 84 $105K
2516 Lake orion MI 27 47 142 $105K
2517 Watchung NJ 5 12 48 $105K
2518 Lovelock NV 10 24 71 $105K
2519 Westport MA 13 26 67 $105K
2520 Union MO 10 22 85 $105K
2521 Mount pleasant SC 41 55 79 $105K
2522 Covington VA 20 51 47 $105K
2523 Lewiston ID 27 43 134 $105K
2524 Knoxville IA 13 28 41 $105K
2525 Oak park MI 33 50 243 $105K
2526 Hannibal MO 19 21 58 $105K
2527 Dover NH 36 39 87 $105K
2528 Warner robins GA 28 14 74 $105K
2529 Kingston PA 18 20 31 $105K
2530 Malvern AR 8 16 67 $105K
2531 Watkins glen NY 20 38 161 $105K
2532 Wright city MO 10 26 45 $105K
2533 Marshall IL 13 28 77 $105K
2534 Blair NE 13 19 38 $105K
2535 Leawood KS 38 34 45 $104K
2536 Windsor WI 5 11 27 $104K
2537 Margate city NJ 9 23 65 $104K
2538 Navasota TX 10 13 40 $104K
2539 Mount union PA 5 11 21 $104K
2540 Winfield WV 8 17 23 $104K
2541 Downey CA 21 18 42 $104K
2542 West bridgewater MA 14 27 51 $104K
2543 Hopkinsville KY 18 25 58 $104K
2544 Sunnyvale CA 49 47 54 $104K
2545 Eagle grove IA 7 26 46 $104K
2546 Mount juliet TN 43 66 158 $104K
2547 Chagrin falls OH 16 13 47 $104K
2548 Aspen CO 53 25 50 $104K
2549 Lombard IL 28 54 86 $104K
2550 Spotswood NJ 6 9 52 $104K
2551 Pratt KS 18 28 56 $104K
2552 Folcroft PA 7 10 39 $104K
2553 Shelby twp MI 14 46 315 $104K
2554 Maywood NJ 10 23 71 $103K
2555 Prescott WI 5 9 47 $103K
2556 Wahiawa HI 23 32 76 $103K
2557 Arabi LA 7 12 17 $103K
2558 Hawthorne CA 19 24 51 $103K
2559 Picayune MS 14 10 34 $103K
2560 Broussard LA 15 22 32 $103K
2561 Little chute WI 8 17 40 $103K
2562 Englishtown NJ 11 18 106 $103K
2563 Bellingham WA 137 302 756 $103K
2564 Hanover township PA 6 14 42 $103K
2565 Avenal CA 12 40 26 $103K
2566 La grange IL 29 28 60 $103K
2567 Corinth NY 7 15 30 $103K
2568 Susanville CA 18 44 86 $103K
2569 Forest MS 8 13 46 $103K
2570 Los banos CA 30 64 50 $103K
2571 Aberdeen NJ 8 10 41 $102K
2572 Monmouth IL 7 27 40 $102K
2573 Towanda PA 8 13 30 $102K
2574 Somerset MA 17 31 65 $102K
2575 Evansville WI 5 12 29 $102K
2576 Park falls WI 5 14 39 $102K
2577 Etna OH 5 10 15 $102K
2578 Sutton MA 11 19 48 $102K
2579 Sparta NJ 21 28 73 $102K
2580 Avon NY 9 24 77 $102K
2581 Fitchburg MA 22 29 90 $102K
2582 Hayward WI 12 23 70 $102K
2583 Stanton CA 10 14 31 $102K
2584 Colchester VT 29 31 94 $102K
2585 Winter park FL 40 18 53 $102K
2586 Cranford NJ 11 25 64 $102K
2587 Flat rock MI 11 21 90 $102K
2588 Corsicana TX 29 16 61 $102K
2589 Fort knox KY 23 51 83 $102K
2590 Owensboro KY 46 69 97 $102K
2591 Tempe AZ 137 117 325 $102K
2592 Lehighton PA 10 20 61 $101K
2593 Effingham IL 18 33 60 $101K
2594 Johnstown CO 22 46 50 $101K
2595 Ephrata PA 16 29 78 $101K
2596 Hampton NH 19 13 87 $101K
2597 Center line MI 9 22 116 $101K
2598 Avon CT 11 31 116 $101K
2599 Lowville NY 19 59 189 $101K
2600 Sullivan MO 12 21 152 $100K
← Previous Page 26 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.