Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2801 Wells NV 8 21 59 $87K
2802 Lime springs IA 5 12 34 $87K
2803 Fitchburg WI 6 9 32 $87K
2804 Williams CA 12 27 45 $87K
2805 Arcadia CA 30 48 97 $87K
2806 Medina NY 21 49 157 $87K
2807 Gibbstown NJ 6 14 70 $87K
2808 Cedarburg WI 11 21 31 $87K
2809 Salem MA 18 22 51 $87K
2810 South elgin IL 11 10 18 $87K
2811 New gretna NJ 7 17 44 $87K
2812 Temecula CA 36 35 85 $87K
2813 Belle mead NJ 8 19 104 $87K
2814 Evans city PA 10 18 24 $87K
2815 Sunrise FL 23 28 40 $87K
2816 Altoona PA 21 30 66 $87K
2817 Tewksbury MA 19 24 48 $87K
2818 Boonville NY 11 24 58 $87K
2819 Fairmont WV 30 37 68 $87K
2820 Prince george VA 24 37 81 $87K
2821 Gallipolis OH 8 16 45 $87K
2822 Carpinteria CA 7 11 45 $87K
2823 Pembroke pines FL 27 28 36 $87K
2824 Ozona TX 5 2 9 $87K
2825 Black river falls WI 13 20 51 $87K
2826 Standish MI 9 27 125 $86K
2827 Key largo FL 13 10 15 $86K
2828 Erie CO 16 27 43 $86K
2829 Douglas WY 8 14 60 $86K
2830 Kingsville TX 28 22 54 $86K
2831 San benito TX 21 13 45 $86K
2832 Aurora MO 5 7 35 $86K
2833 Vandalia OH 18 28 44 $86K
2834 Camilla GA 6 12 14 $86K
2835 Keene NH 21 19 26 $86K
2836 Macungie PA 14 31 74 $86K
2837 Somers point NJ 8 20 57 $86K
2838 Woodinville WA 31 53 184 $86K
2839 Waverly VA 8 17 101 $86K
2840 Berea KY 7 12 23 $86K
2841 Accomac VA 5 14 55 $86K
2842 Langhorne PA 13 16 45 $86K
2843 Michigan center MI 6 24 93 $86K
2844 Bellows falls VT 12 21 49 $86K
2845 Hopewell VA 24 40 88 $86K
2846 Middleburg FL 20 17 16 $86K
2847 Cassopolis MI 8 25 82 $86K
2848 Derry NH 22 16 48 $86K
2849 Park city UT 45 65 96 $86K
2850 Russellville KY 6 10 39 $86K
2851 Saint clair MI 23 52 133 $86K
2852 Salem NH 34 27 58 $86K
2853 Coleman MI 7 19 112 $85K
2854 Hanceville AL 12 13 31 $85K
2855 North wales PA 12 16 42 $85K
2856 Sonoma CA 13 21 57 $85K
2857 Spokane valley WA 39 92 201 $85K
2858 Plainview TX 15 20 65 $85K
2859 Uniontown PA 29 31 59 $85K
2860 Terminal island CA 15 47 64 $85K
2861 Tazewell VA 8 17 38 $85K
2862 Weyauwega WI 5 15 85 $85K
2863 El monte CA 42 29 77 $85K
2864 Shiner TX 6 15 26 $85K
2865 Church point LA 6 6 33 $85K
2866 Ossining NY 26 39 75 $85K
2867 Johnson creek WI 5 12 24 $85K
2868 Perry IA 10 21 72 $85K
2869 Laie HI 5 12 33 $85K
2870 Cleveland GA 10 17 87 $85K
2871 Plainsboro NJ 11 12 36 $85K
2872 Hawthorne CA 18 22 49 $85K
2873 Orangeburg SC 32 30 113 $85K
2874 Brookshire TX 7 14 49 $85K
2875 Belmond IA 5 9 54 $85K
2876 Temple GA 7 17 66 $85K
2877 Saint james MO 11 15 31 $85K
2878 Parkville MD 16 29 87 $84K
2879 Brighton MA 24 24 32 $84K
2880 Clayton NJ 7 17 53 $84K
2881 Milan MI 15 40 126 $84K
2882 London OH 12 18 19 $84K
2883 Darien CT 10 24 104 $84K
2884 High bridge NJ 7 20 73 $84K
2885 Mccomb MS 8 11 24 $84K
2886 Manasquan NJ 9 11 45 $84K
2887 Westport CT 17 25 101 $84K
2888 Gloucester city NJ 12 16 53 $84K
2889 Sea girt NJ 7 15 66 $83K
2890 Bedford PA 16 30 41 $83K
2891 Allentown NJ 7 17 56 $83K
2892 Alvarado TX 12 15 18 $83K
2893 Canastota NY 16 40 107 $83K
2894 Mankato MN 56 119 176 $83K
2895 Suffield CT 14 33 82 $83K
2896 Scottsbluff NE 8 15 31 $83K
2897 Wickliffe OH 12 13 49 $83K
2898 Thomaston ME 5 10 60 $83K
2899 Mcclellan CA 10 30 51 $83K
2900 Hudson WI 13 25 47 $83K
← Previous Page 29 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.