Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2901 Tazewell VA 8 17 38 $85K
2902 Weyauwega WI 5 15 85 $85K
2903 Lowell MI 23 43 168 $85K
2904 Shiner TX 6 15 26 $85K
2905 Church point LA 6 6 33 $85K
2906 Ellwood city PA 10 21 54 $85K
2907 San carlos CA 18 26 72 $85K
2908 Ossining NY 26 39 75 $85K
2909 Johnson creek WI 5 12 24 $85K
2910 Perry IA 10 21 72 $85K
2911 Laie HI 5 12 33 $85K
2912 North smithfield RI 11 22 59 $85K
2913 Cleveland GA 10 17 87 $85K
2914 Plainsboro NJ 12 12 36 $85K
2915 Orangeburg SC 32 30 113 $85K
2916 Brookshire TX 7 14 49 $85K
2917 Belmond IA 5 9 54 $85K
2918 Temple GA 7 18 66 $85K
2919 Selbyville DE 10 17 34 $85K
2920 Saline MI 17 52 99 $85K
2921 Saint james MO 11 15 31 $85K
2922 Brighton MA 24 24 32 $84K
2923 Milan MI 15 40 126 $84K
2924 Pedricktown NJ 8 21 85 $84K
2925 Caruthers CA 10 25 47 $84K
2926 High bridge NJ 7 20 73 $84K
2927 Mccomb MS 9 11 24 $84K
2928 Chillicothe IL 10 26 77 $84K
2929 Manasquan NJ 9 11 45 $84K
2930 Narrows VA 10 34 16 $84K
2931 North wales PA 12 16 42 $84K
2932 Westport CT 17 25 101 $84K
2933 Gloucester city NJ 13 18 56 $84K
2934 Isabela PR 33 47 102 $84K
2935 Point pleasant beach NJ 14 17 56 $84K
2936 Sea girt NJ 7 15 66 $83K
2937 Bedford PA 19 36 44 $83K
2938 Waterloo NY 40 92 204 $83K
2939 Woodbury heights NJ 10 20 68 $83K
2940 Canastota NY 16 41 108 $83K
2941 Western springs IL 6 13 19 $83K
2942 Allentown NJ 7 17 56 $83K
2943 Alvarado TX 12 15 18 $83K
2944 Mankato MN 56 119 176 $83K
2945 Scottsbluff NE 9 17 31 $83K
2946 Wickliffe OH 12 13 49 $83K
2947 Thomaston ME 6 12 60 $83K
2948 Mcclellan CA 10 30 51 $83K
2949 Rodeo CA 5 44 94 $83K
2950 Hudson WI 13 25 47 $83K
2951 Byron center MI 39 63 128 $83K
2952 New philadelphia OH 8 11 29 $83K
2953 Santa monica CA 26 24 36 $83K
2954 Asheville NC 119 160 371 $83K
2955 San german PR 37 82 144 $82K
2956 Union grove WI 11 19 31 $82K
2957 Columbus NJ 12 23 85 $82K
2958 Canandaigua NY 57 113 320 $82K
2959 Robertsdale AL 10 19 65 $82K
2960 Ronkonkoma NY 38 24 68 $82K
2961 Porterville CA 44 75 101 $82K
2962 Church hill TN 16 38 116 $82K
2963 La quinta CA 8 11 18 $82K
2964 Southaven MS 33 35 31 $82K
2965 Stuart VA 17 44 52 $82K
2966 San fernando CA 10 18 81 $82K
2967 Derby CT 8 22 112 $82K
2968 Donora PA 11 21 49 $81K
2969 Dunmore PA 11 21 42 $81K
2970 Cleveland TX 14 15 60 $81K
2971 Horicon WI 10 25 37 $81K
2972 Pontotoc MS 10 22 64 $81K
2973 Seward NE 5 10 17 $81K
2974 Ashland city TN 32 71 186 $81K
2975 Winneconne WI 5 11 43 $81K
2976 Cohoes NY 23 73 228 $81K
2977 Evergreen AL 6 15 48 $81K
2978 Las piedras PR 18 40 86 $81K
2979 Parker AZ 16 26 131 $81K
2980 Newington NH 8 17 34 $81K
2981 Orem UT 63 68 140 $81K
2982 Walnut CA 24 17 41 $81K
2983 Alice TX 38 20 56 $81K
2984 Branchville NJ 7 24 52 $81K
2985 Hornell NY 13 19 115 $81K
2986 Concord NC 62 48 141 $81K
2987 Tumon GU 29 46 94 $81K
2988 Wayland MI 25 40 108 $81K
2989 Roscoe IL 10 18 37 $81K
2990 Ivyland PA 13 27 103 $81K
2991 Carthage MS 8 12 19 $81K
2992 Semmes AL 14 22 64 $81K
2993 Pittsburg KS 21 26 45 $81K
2994 Whitehouse station NJ 7 6 51 $81K
2995 Evergreen CO 7 11 20 $81K
2996 Alamosa CO 10 18 48 $81K
2997 Medford lakes NJ 6 17 69 $81K
2998 Crossett AR 11 6 22 $81K
2999 Stilwell KS 13 18 31 $80K
3000 Royersford PA 14 13 74 $80K
← Previous Page 30 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.