Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4801 Alamogordo NM 22 28 31 $26K
4802 Livingston TX 14 7 9 $26K
4803 Cobleskill NY 17 34 85 $26K
4804 Marcus hook PA 7 8 9 $26K
4805 Charleston OR 8 24 62 $26K
4806 White lake MI 13 20 44 $26K
4807 West hollywood CA 8 10 15 $26K
4808 Jasper TX 5 4 9 $26K
4809 Clinton OK 10 7 8 $26K
4810 Girard PA 7 12 51 $26K
4811 Bedford IN 15 9 12 $26K
4812 Millstone township NJ 6 9 17 $26K
4813 New paris IN 5 7 14 $25K
4814 Woodburn OR 43 90 163 $25K
4815 Waterbury VT 13 18 35 $25K
4816 Bayport NY 7 11 22 $25K
4817 Nellis afb NV 24 72 113 $25K
4818 West branch MI 14 24 41 $25K
4819 Salinas PR 14 25 53 $25K
4820 Evington VA 27 58 36 $25K
4821 Lone tree CO 9 14 16 $25K
4822 Jerseyville IL 15 26 45 $25K
4823 Lakeville MN 33 52 87 $25K
4824 Spartanburg SC 61 40 84 $25K
4825 Cambridge MN 9 15 42 $25K
4826 Coram NY 7 9 48 $25K
4827 Huntington NY 57 32 89 $25K
4828 Carmichael CA 29 26 32 $25K
4829 Allston MA 17 8 13 $25K
4830 Clive IA 20 10 29 $25K
4831 Woodstock VT 5 6 27 $25K
4832 Mulvane KS 6 6 5 $25K
4833 West yarmouth MA 11 8 9 $25K
4834 Marlette MI 6 23 64 $25K
4835 Meyersdale PA 7 9 34 $25K
4836 Northvale NJ 9 8 41 $25K
4837 Saint joseph MI 22 28 55 $25K
4838 Waukee IA 11 16 36 $25K
4839 Aberdeen MD 24 44 112 $25K
4840 East greenville PA 8 23 39 $25K
4841 New cumberland PA 10 18 81 $25K
4842 Pomona NY 7 10 16 $25K
4843 Bartlett TN 7 15 62 $25K
4844 Charlton MA 5 9 19 $25K
4845 Gig harbor WA 23 41 107 $25K
4846 Oxford PA 5 8 19 $25K
4847 Orono ME 15 29 32 $25K
4848 Okemos MI 25 32 95 $25K
4849 Biggs CA 5 11 9 $25K
4850 Atlantic beach NY 9 16 32 $25K
4851 Moore haven FL 5 2 2 $25K
4852 Federalsburg MD 7 14 65 $25K
4853 Waldron AR 6 7 22 $25K
4854 Santa isabel PR 14 36 42 $25K
4855 Fergus falls MN 9 18 44 $25K
4856 Harbor beach MI 5 13 87 $25K
4857 Roxboro NC 8 17 48 $25K
4858 Elwood IL 7 18 19 $25K
4859 Lebanon KY 6 6 21 $25K
4860 Hermitage TN 17 12 51 $24K
4861 Thousand oaks CA 20 13 32 $24K
4862 Hollidaysburg PA 5 9 13 $24K
4863 Carthage TX 7 5 5 $24K
4864 Lilburn GA 9 9 48 $24K
4865 Apple valley MN 12 24 21 $24K
4866 Frankenmuth MI 18 33 65 $24K
4867 Alloway NJ 7 18 49 $24K
4868 Queen creek AZ 18 27 47 $24K
4869 Caseyville IL 5 6 18 $24K
4870 Baxter MN 5 9 22 $24K
4871 Camdenton MO 10 5 11 $24K
4872 Del valle TX 7 6 18 $24K
4873 Lynnwood WA 63 106 236 $24K
4874 Leesport PA 6 16 21 $24K
4875 Brookline MA 26 26 26 $24K
4876 Quinton NJ 5 14 44 $24K
4877 Othello WA 12 27 61 $24K
4878 Plainview NY 26 11 54 $24K
4879 Lobelville TN 10 25 104 $24K
4880 Grand island NY 18 29 53 $24K
4881 Southbury CT 9 25 79 $24K
4882 Pampa TX 11 6 11 $24K
4883 Dillwyn VA 7 11 18 $24K
4884 Saint clair PA 6 10 25 $24K
4885 Shaw afb SC 8 19 35 $24K
4886 La porte IN 13 17 16 $24K
4887 Charleston afb SC 12 26 43 $24K
4888 White pigeon MI 5 8 46 $24K
4889 White bluff TN 13 30 110 $24K
4890 Holiday FL 5 6 9 $24K
4891 Platte city MO 10 6 18 $24K
4892 Wheat ridge CO 26 23 33 $24K
4893 Bayside NY 17 17 30 $24K
4894 Buckley WA 10 20 48 $24K
4895 North mankato MN 8 17 25 $24K
4896 Eighty four PA 12 16 31 $24K
4897 Bonner springs KS 7 6 9 $24K
4898 Gregory TX 5 13 8 $24K
4899 Stewartsville NJ 8 15 42 $24K
4900 Estero FL 7 2 7 $24K
← Previous Page 49 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.