Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4401 Rockford MI 24 40 85 $34K
4402 Mckeesport PA 14 16 28 $34K
4403 Lakehurst NJ 6 10 17 $34K
4404 Mio MI 8 18 92 $34K
4405 Wind gap PA 5 12 39 $34K
4406 Sugar grove IL 6 9 20 $34K
4407 Catlettsburg KY 11 29 33 $34K
4408 Commack NY 26 14 43 $34K
4409 Ponca city OK 17 14 26 $34K
4410 White plains MD 9 14 80 $34K
4411 Murphysboro IL 6 14 23 $34K
4412 American falls ID 9 16 32 $34K
4413 Sutter CA 5 15 37 $34K
4414 Woodstock GA 36 22 26 $33K
4415 Apex NC 42 48 99 $33K
4416 Wallington NJ 9 11 21 $33K
4417 Cloverdale CA 6 10 17 $33K
4418 Roanoke TX 19 11 16 $33K
4419 De soto KS 10 18 12 $33K
4420 New brighton PA 12 22 44 $33K
4421 Pinconning MI 7 19 61 $33K
4422 East greenbush NY 9 13 46 $33K
4423 Senatobia MS 10 14 22 $33K
4424 Maite GU 10 24 42 $33K
4425 Stone harbor NJ 10 14 33 $33K
4426 Owatonna MN 13 26 58 $33K
4427 Ringgold GA 9 14 36 $33K
4428 Forest grove OR 17 41 106 $33K
4429 Thomasville NC 25 24 104 $33K
4430 Lawrence NY 15 25 45 $33K
4431 South hill VA 13 20 40 $33K
4432 Garner NC 42 41 41 $33K
4433 Louisville OH 8 15 27 $33K
4434 Shelbyville IL 7 13 34 $33K
4435 Robesonia PA 5 7 11 $33K
4436 Valley city ND 5 9 20 $33K
4437 Collingswood NJ 9 13 47 $33K
4438 Oceanport NJ 5 12 23 $33K
4439 Copiague NY 14 9 45 $33K
4440 Clemmons NC 14 20 61 $33K
4441 Montoursville PA 10 7 20 $33K
4442 Prior lake MN 5 7 8 $33K
4443 Douglassville PA 6 13 18 $33K
4444 Linden TN 13 24 124 $33K
4445 Warrenville IL 15 20 33 $33K
4446 Macdoel CA 8 20 25 $33K
4447 Waianae HI 10 10 35 $33K
4448 Horn lake MS 10 16 21 $33K
4449 Selmer TN 19 43 155 $33K
4450 Glendale WI 5 9 7 $33K
4451 Mancelona MI 8 17 109 $33K
4452 Yarmouth ME 9 8 22 $33K
4453 Jefferson city TN 16 35 133 $33K
4454 Greenbrier TN 6 12 66 $33K
4455 Rensselaer NY 18 36 148 $33K
4456 New york city NY 8 22 20 $33K
4457 Carrollton KY 5 3 14 $33K
4458 Danville KY 9 9 23 $33K
4459 Forest hills NY 21 39 43 $32K
4460 Hiram GA 13 14 19 $32K
4461 Sinclairville NY 8 21 63 $32K
4462 Ardsley NY 11 21 55 $32K
4463 Groveland CA 7 15 33 $32K
4464 North providence RI 14 20 20 $32K
4465 Ellabell GA 8 21 12 $32K
4466 Hamtramck MI 12 22 85 $32K
4467 Carlyle IL 12 23 63 $32K
4468 Dillon SC 7 7 37 $32K
4469 Edwardsburg MI 5 8 29 $32K
4470 Haleiwa HI 12 16 35 $32K
4471 Cabot AR 12 6 14 $32K
4472 Deridder LA 5 4 21 $32K
4473 Whitinsville MA 5 10 27 $32K
4474 Dover foxcroft ME 7 19 103 $32K
4475 Rhinelander WI 9 15 37 $32K
4476 Los gatos CA 8 12 39 $32K
4477 St peter MN 5 10 27 $32K
4478 Farmersville TX 7 9 13 $32K
4479 Nanticoke PA 9 17 15 $32K
4480 Colchester CT 5 16 72 $32K
4481 Menands NY 13 29 53 $32K
4482 New stanton PA 13 26 23 $32K
4483 Elk city OK 10 4 8 $32K
4484 Grovetown GA 5 2 8 $32K
4485 Dewitt MI 19 37 69 $32K
4486 La place LA 8 15 18 $32K
4487 Newfield NJ 11 15 31 $32K
4488 Wauwatosa WI 5 12 12 $32K
4489 Chateaugay NY 6 17 42 $32K
4490 Burton MI 20 36 113 $32K
4491 Lexington NC 37 43 121 $32K
4492 Sequim WA 13 29 144 $32K
4493 Brownsville PA 6 8 18 $32K
4494 Flagstaff AZ 50 39 73 $32K
4495 Tunkhannock PA 10 6 11 $32K
4496 Kunia HI 8 17 27 $32K
4497 Menominee MI 26 56 114 $32K
4498 Port orange FL 18 6 7 $32K
4499 Sweetwater TN 12 16 60 $32K
4500 Soldotna AK 11 29 39 $32K
← Previous Page 45 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.