Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4401 Hoquiam WA 16 35 123 $35K
4402 Erwin TN 19 41 88 $35K
4403 Danielson CT 11 20 179 $35K
4404 Fairmont NC 7 7 84 $35K
4405 Valley city ND 6 11 22 $35K
4406 Charleston IL 7 12 9 $35K
4407 North huntingdon PA 7 12 17 $35K
4408 Liberty hill TX 11 6 7 $35K
4409 Juneau WI 5 9 26 $35K
4410 The woodlands TX 9 14 16 $35K
4411 Pittsfield IL 5 13 22 $35K
4412 West point MS 18 16 19 $35K
4413 Creola AL 5 12 31 $35K
4414 Litchfield park AZ 15 14 18 $35K
4415 Evans GA 14 4 10 $35K
4416 Bergen NY 7 16 42 $35K
4417 Hixson TN 22 28 116 $35K
4418 Fillmore CA 17 36 54 $35K
4419 Bedford TX 28 8 11 $35K
4420 Canon city CO 9 12 22 $35K
4421 Gaylord MI 33 63 202 $35K
4422 Westwood MA 13 10 22 $35K
4423 Highland CA 18 25 28 $35K
4424 Clarkston WA 23 50 109 $35K
4425 Jasper GA 11 12 44 $35K
4426 Hickory NC 75 105 254 $35K
4427 Athens WV 5 8 29 $35K
4428 Riverside MO 12 11 16 $35K
4429 Greene NY 11 31 65 $35K
4430 Webster MA 7 8 17 $35K
4431 Mckeesport PA 17 20 32 $35K
4432 Lakeport CA 6 16 36 $35K
4433 Woodbury TN 15 29 192 $35K
4434 Richland MS 11 6 29 $35K
4435 Pikesville MD 16 15 83 $35K
4436 Florence AZ 21 40 42 $35K
4437 Riverhead NY 44 24 59 $35K
4438 Cromwell CT 12 24 124 $35K
4439 Tannersville PA 7 14 15 $35K
4440 Fort washington PA 8 6 17 $34K
4441 Snoqualmie WA 11 25 30 $34K
4442 Alexander AR 10 12 27 $34K
4443 Etowah TN 10 24 57 $34K
4444 Ridgefield CT 10 18 100 $34K
4445 New hope PA 7 5 30 $34K
4446 Oxon hill MD 10 17 64 $34K
4447 Exeter NH 21 14 12 $34K
4448 East tawas MI 6 14 51 $34K
4449 Tukwila WA 18 40 82 $34K
4450 Cayce SC 11 10 35 $34K
4451 Saint louis MI 6 16 40 $34K
4452 Draper UT 48 52 93 $34K
4453 Baraga MI 6 14 43 $34K
4454 New bethlehem PA 5 11 43 $34K
4455 Rocky hill CT 20 43 168 $34K
4456 Clarksdale MS 13 16 42 $34K
4457 Harwood heights IL 14 6 36 $34K
4458 Satsuma AL 6 7 26 $34K
4459 Kaysville UT 17 21 36 $34K
4460 Doylestown PA 13 18 21 $34K
4461 Seville OH 6 8 11 $34K
4462 Grand bay AL 6 8 43 $34K
4463 Northwood IA 5 13 24 $34K
4464 Prairie village KS 8 8 11 $34K
4465 Honeoye falls NY 9 27 92 $34K
4466 Burr ridge IL 7 11 25 $34K
4467 Bronson MI 8 20 72 $34K
4468 Rockford MI 24 40 85 $34K
4469 Lakehurst NJ 6 10 17 $34K
4470 Mio MI 8 18 92 $34K
4471 Sugar grove IL 6 9 20 $34K
4472 Catlettsburg KY 11 29 33 $34K
4473 Commack NY 27 14 43 $34K
4474 Ponca city OK 17 14 26 $34K
4475 White plains MD 9 14 80 $34K
4476 Sutter CA 5 15 37 $34K
4477 Woodstock GA 36 22 26 $33K
4478 Apex NC 42 48 99 $33K
4479 Wallington NJ 9 11 21 $33K
4480 Roanoke TX 19 11 16 $33K
4481 De soto KS 10 18 12 $33K
4482 Moore haven FL 5 2 4 $33K
4483 Clinton IL 12 22 34 $33K
4484 New brighton PA 12 22 44 $33K
4485 Pinconning MI 7 19 61 $33K
4486 East greenbush NY 9 13 46 $33K
4487 Senatobia MS 10 14 22 $33K
4488 Maite GU 10 24 42 $33K
4489 Stone harbor NJ 10 14 33 $33K
4490 Owatonna MN 13 26 58 $33K
4491 Ringgold GA 9 14 36 $33K
4492 Forest grove OR 17 41 106 $33K
4493 Thomasville NC 25 24 104 $33K
4494 Farmington MO 16 25 31 $33K
4495 Lawrence NY 15 25 45 $33K
4496 South hill VA 13 20 40 $33K
4497 Holly MI 11 27 75 $33K
4498 Windsor CA 12 11 19 $33K
4499 Garner NC 42 41 41 $33K
4500 Louisville OH 8 15 27 $33K
← Previous Page 45 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.