Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4301 Old hickory TN 8 11 70 $36K
4302 Constantine MI 7 18 35 $36K
4303 Calumet city IL 18 154 28 $36K
4304 Columbia IL 6 10 23 $36K
4305 Monte vista CO 7 12 30 $36K
4306 Del mar CA 5 8 17 $36K
4307 New paltz NY 11 22 55 $36K
4308 Greenwood SC 27 32 67 $36K
4309 White marsh MD 13 22 124 $36K
4310 Lake saint louis MO 5 5 15 $36K
4311 Sellersville PA 10 22 31 $36K
4312 Lacey WA 44 77 202 $36K
4313 Warrenton VA 18 14 81 $36K
4314 Gulf breeze FL 16 4 28 $36K
4315 Huron SD 9 8 13 $36K
4316 Copley OH 5 10 12 $36K
4317 Collinwood TN 10 27 126 $36K
4318 Payson AZ 11 11 40 $36K
4319 Jesup IA 5 6 15 $36K
4320 Muskegon heights MI 6 13 28 $36K
4321 Ringgold VA 9 28 19 $36K
4322 Ooltewah TN 9 13 68 $36K
4323 Lisbon OH 6 14 21 $36K
4324 Ogdensburg NY 17 40 87 $36K
4325 Highland MI 8 15 89 $36K
4326 Cornelius NC 22 27 46 $36K
4327 Newport AR 10 14 13 $36K
4328 Hegins PA 5 12 14 $36K
4329 Smithville MO 5 4 7 $36K
4330 Snow hill NC 7 7 48 $36K
4331 Wareham MA 12 16 29 $36K
4332 Debary FL 6 6 35 $36K
4333 Grants pass OR 71 172 343 $36K
4334 Riverdale CA 5 9 12 $36K
4335 Mccall ID 7 6 7 $36K
4336 Nevada IA 10 19 88 $36K
4337 Crozet VA 9 17 17 $35K
4338 Hoquiam WA 16 35 123 $35K
4339 Erwin TN 19 40 86 $35K
4340 Kawkawlin MI 7 19 98 $35K
4341 Danielson CT 11 20 179 $35K
4342 Fairmont NC 7 7 84 $35K
4343 Maitland FL 14 14 8 $35K
4344 Charleston IL 7 12 9 $35K
4345 North huntingdon PA 7 12 17 $35K
4346 Liberty hill TX 11 6 7 $35K
4347 Juneau WI 5 9 26 $35K
4348 The woodlands TX 9 14 16 $35K
4349 Pittsfield IL 5 13 22 $35K
4350 West point MS 18 16 19 $35K
4351 Creola AL 5 11 31 $35K
4352 Elkton MI 5 11 56 $35K
4353 Litchfield park AZ 15 14 18 $35K
4354 Evans GA 14 4 10 $35K
4355 Bergen NY 7 16 42 $35K
4356 Hixson TN 22 28 111 $35K
4357 Bedford TX 28 8 11 $35K
4358 Canon city CO 9 12 22 $35K
4359 Gaylord MI 32 61 198 $35K
4360 Westwood MA 13 10 22 $35K
4361 Highland CA 18 25 28 $35K
4362 Clarkston WA 23 50 109 $35K
4363 Jasper GA 11 12 44 $35K
4364 Hickory NC 75 105 254 $35K
4365 Athens WV 5 8 29 $35K
4366 Riverside MO 12 11 16 $35K
4367 Kingshill VI 27 79 173 $35K
4368 Webster MA 7 8 17 $35K
4369 Monticello IA 5 13 35 $35K
4370 Woodbury TN 13 25 143 $35K
4371 Richland MS 11 6 29 $35K
4372 Pikesville MD 16 15 83 $35K
4373 Florence AZ 21 40 42 $35K
4374 Riverhead NY 44 24 59 $35K
4375 Cromwell CT 12 24 124 $35K
4376 Tannersville PA 6 12 15 $35K
4377 Fort washington PA 8 6 17 $34K
4378 Snoqualmie WA 11 25 30 $34K
4379 Alexander AR 10 12 27 $34K
4380 Etowah TN 10 24 57 $34K
4381 Ridgefield CT 10 18 100 $34K
4382 New hope PA 7 5 30 $34K
4383 Exeter NH 21 14 12 $34K
4384 East tawas MI 6 14 51 $34K
4385 Tukwila WA 18 40 82 $34K
4386 Cayce SC 11 10 35 $34K
4387 Saint louis MI 6 16 40 $34K
4388 Draper UT 48 51 93 $34K
4389 New bethlehem PA 5 11 43 $34K
4390 Rocky hill CT 20 43 168 $34K
4391 Clarksdale MS 13 16 42 $34K
4392 Harwood heights IL 13 4 36 $34K
4393 Satsuma AL 6 7 26 $34K
4394 Kaysville UT 17 21 36 $34K
4395 Doylestown PA 13 18 21 $34K
4396 Seville OH 6 8 11 $34K
4397 Grand bay AL 6 8 43 $34K
4398 Northwood IA 5 13 24 $34K
4399 Prairie village KS 8 8 11 $34K
4400 Burr ridge IL 7 11 25 $34K
← Previous Page 44 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.