Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4201 Mills WY 7 18 78 $39K
4202 Sudbury MA 10 8 18 $39K
4203 Nesquehoning PA 6 16 31 $39K
4204 Ashland PA 6 7 24 $39K
4205 Brainerd MN 23 23 70 $39K
4206 Wantagh NY 14 16 71 $39K
4207 Coyanosa TX 6 14 9 $39K
4208 Defuniak springs FL 9 6 9 $39K
4209 Dearborn heights MI 23 31 81 $39K
4210 Emporium PA 6 10 35 $39K
4211 Bolivar MO 10 11 29 $39K
4212 Chestertown MD 8 16 189 $39K
4213 Capitol heights MD 26 27 79 $38K
4214 Mason MI 14 36 54 $38K
4215 Augusta WI 5 10 23 $38K
4216 Fairfield ME 5 15 53 $38K
4217 Summit MS 7 13 25 $38K
4218 North platte NE 18 18 29 $38K
4219 Yorkville NY 7 13 25 $38K
4220 Waterford CT 19 36 151 $38K
4221 Bluefield VA 10 12 69 $38K
4222 Windom MN 6 13 41 $38K
4223 New carlisle OH 10 14 55 $38K
4224 Moscow TN 11 30 130 $38K
4225 North baltimore OH 5 11 30 $38K
4226 Pearl harbor HI 22 54 66 $38K
4227 Colonial beach VA 25 49 154 $38K
4228 Onalaska WI 7 8 22 $38K
4229 Ellijay GA 7 5 26 $38K
4230 Brandywine MD 6 6 31 $38K
4231 Du quoin IL 6 12 39 $38K
4232 Clewiston FL 16 16 13 $38K
4233 Ringoes NJ 8 8 34 $38K
4234 Clinton MO 8 10 15 $38K
4235 Glenville NY 5 13 40 $38K
4236 Portage PA 5 8 28 $38K
4237 Geneva OH 8 9 10 $38K
4238 Kennett square PA 11 10 14 $38K
4239 Minden LA 14 6 20 $38K
4240 Upland CA 29 58 92 $38K
4241 Jamestown NC 10 19 35 $38K
4242 Hopkinton MA 8 13 16 $38K
4243 Brownwood TX 14 10 32 $38K
4244 Belding MI 11 16 50 $38K
4245 Wake forest NC 34 58 39 $38K
4246 Greene NY 9 26 55 $38K
4247 Corinne UT 6 14 28 $38K
4248 Trenton MI 22 40 67 $38K
4249 Garden city MI 13 19 75 $38K
4250 Gloucester VA 20 36 69 $38K
4251 New canaan CT 8 16 40 $38K
4252 Norridge IL 7 10 21 $37K
4253 Malvern PA 16 8 20 $37K
4254 Coto laurel PR 19 19 26 $37K
4255 Arab AL 6 13 20 $37K
4256 Battle mountain NV 14 27 76 $37K
4257 Sandusky MI 11 22 138 $37K
4258 Reed city MI 5 19 60 $37K
4259 Kuna ID 8 18 27 $37K
4260 Congers NY 11 12 37 $37K
4261 Villalba PR 8 15 53 $37K
4262 Freeport FL 11 10 14 $37K
4263 Monroeville NJ 10 24 55 $37K
4264 Bainbridge island WA 22 45 129 $37K
4265 Connellsville PA 14 19 56 $37K
4266 Eastpointe MI 11 11 40 $37K
4267 Collinsville IL 22 31 32 $37K
4268 Califon NJ 6 12 47 $37K
4269 Myrtle beach SC 106 68 107 $37K
4270 Middletown CA 5 8 12 $37K
4271 Lewistown MT 10 20 38 $37K
4272 Greenfield MA 13 12 28 $37K
4273 Sebewaing MI 8 22 84 $37K
4274 Lumberton NJ 7 14 36 $37K
4275 Williamsport MD 9 24 71 $37K
4276 Lakeville MA 11 15 33 $37K
4277 Harmony PA 8 12 29 $37K
4278 Wolcott CT 6 16 66 $37K
4279 Duncansville PA 6 11 21 $37K
4280 Elmer NJ 12 26 64 $37K
4281 Norman park GA 7 6 26 $37K
4282 Deer park NY 29 21 43 $37K
4283 Johnson city NY 22 34 100 $37K
4284 Norwich NY 27 73 165 $37K
4285 Palm harbor FL 21 14 16 $37K
4286 Southampton PA 11 20 24 $37K
4287 Whitmore lake MI 15 30 122 $37K
4288 Grand rapids MN 14 26 38 $37K
4289 Ship bottom NJ 7 20 76 $37K
4290 Grove city PA 18 26 23 $37K
4291 Newman CA 9 23 35 $37K
4292 Elk river MN 22 31 78 $37K
4293 Chardon OH 11 14 23 $37K
4294 Herington KS 5 7 9 $37K
4295 Farley IA 5 8 15 $37K
4296 Bogota NJ 10 22 96 $37K
4297 Scott depot WV 6 5 15 $37K
4298 Mcminnville TN 21 42 155 $36K
4299 Wyandotte MI 14 30 85 $36K
4300 Warrenton OR 13 30 47 $36K
← Previous Page 43 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.