Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4101 Carbondale PA 7 11 25 $41K
4102 Montello WI 5 7 37 $41K
4103 Essex MD 6 11 42 $41K
4104 Perkasie PA 8 9 36 $41K
4105 Louisa VA 10 25 55 $41K
4106 Steamboat springs CO 9 16 33 $41K
4107 Gray TN 8 24 95 $41K
4108 Evesham NJ 5 10 17 $41K
4109 La mirada CA 11 11 46 $41K
4110 Monroe city MO 7 10 18 $41K
4111 Hingham MA 12 12 29 $41K
4112 Newberry FL 6 9 9 $41K
4113 Breckenridge TX 5 4 11 $41K
4114 Cerritos CA 17 14 17 $41K
4115 Northridge CA 19 12 36 $41K
4116 Pine grove PA 8 18 23 $41K
4117 Prosper TX 10 8 15 $41K
4118 Jordan NY 11 28 69 $41K
4119 Chicago ridge IL 9 8 31 $41K
4120 Hastings on hudson NY 9 17 47 $41K
4121 Gresham OR 64 106 242 $41K
4122 Medford NY 18 19 15 $41K
4123 Irwin PA 21 18 16 $40K
4124 Green cove springs FL 17 18 37 $40K
4125 Girard OH 9 10 29 $40K
4126 Lima NY 14 32 82 $40K
4127 Middletown RI 14 13 12 $40K
4128 North royalton OH 10 11 43 $40K
4129 Monessen PA 7 13 53 $40K
4130 Genoa city WI 5 10 33 $40K
4131 Dunn NC 31 21 84 $40K
4132 Clinton MA 7 8 25 $40K
4133 Garden city NY 49 30 43 $40K
4134 Waterford MI 40 44 93 $40K
4135 Harrisburg NC 11 12 33 $40K
4136 Bartow FL 16 14 39 $40K
4137 Beaver falls PA 14 20 46 $40K
4138 Westerly RI 22 14 37 $40K
4139 Englewood OH 7 10 43 $40K
4140 Albion MI 16 29 110 $40K
4141 Rocky mount NC 24 20 58 $40K
4142 Quincy FL 12 11 17 $40K
4143 Edwardsville KS 8 18 17 $40K
4144 Tualatin OR 63 132 318 $40K
4145 Marshfield MA 11 14 32 $40K
4146 New baltimore MI 21 22 75 $40K
4147 Eagan MN 28 64 85 $40K
4148 Woodbridge CT 6 21 61 $40K
4149 Braddock PA 10 23 19 $40K
4150 Columbiana AL 5 7 22 $40K
4151 Uncasville CT 5 20 127 $40K
4152 Faribault MN 18 36 68 $40K
4153 Bunnell FL 12 15 29 $40K
4154 Columbus junction IA 5 13 13 $40K
4155 Taft CA 9 19 22 $40K
4156 Rainier OR 9 29 45 $40K
4157 Hamlet NC 5 11 41 $40K
4158 West carrollton OH 5 10 26 $40K
4159 Mount arlington NJ 7 14 26 $40K
4160 Perry hall MD 15 27 84 $40K
4161 Eagle ID 23 31 42 $40K
4162 Hiawatha IA 14 11 57 $40K
4163 Kutztown PA 6 13 11 $40K
4164 Riverside RI 10 9 12 $40K
4165 West milford NJ 9 14 29 $40K
4166 Florence OR 16 37 80 $40K
4167 Wisconsin dells WI 14 10 13 $40K
4168 Rolla MO 24 22 51 $40K
4169 Auburn CA 17 18 27 $40K
4170 Axis AL 9 21 13 $40K
4171 Paradise CA 45 104 117 $40K
4172 Industry CA 5 11 20 $40K
4173 Canovanas PR 25 52 73 $39K
4174 Rego park NY 15 6 10 $39K
4175 Quebradillas PR 17 28 62 $39K
4176 Needles CA 7 14 35 $39K
4177 Devine TX 8 14 35 $39K
4178 Sherman oaks CA 17 10 9 $39K
4179 Maricopa AZ 20 31 56 $39K
4180 Gardiner ME 7 17 99 $39K
4181 Sabetha KS 5 6 14 $39K
4182 Chantilly VA 82 42 97 $39K
4183 Stockbridge GA 26 16 32 $39K
4184 Aguada PR 22 50 71 $39K
4185 Hopewell junction NY 6 12 34 $39K
4186 Wausaukee WI 6 10 53 $39K
4187 Hanover VA 5 12 73 $39K
4188 Long beach MS 12 10 13 $39K
4189 Guilderland center NY 10 22 58 $39K
4190 Loiza PR 7 18 45 $39K
4191 Clayton OH 9 13 31 $39K
4192 Vincennes IN 21 23 40 $39K
4193 Ottawa lake MI 7 16 79 $39K
4194 Port washington WI 9 12 29 $39K
4195 Woodville MS 6 8 26 $39K
4196 Elkton VA 5 17 39 $39K
4197 Disputanta VA 5 10 13 $39K
4198 Bethel park PA 14 11 35 $39K
4199 Waynesburg PA 16 17 24 $39K
4200 New port richey FL 40 13 24 $39K
← Previous Page 42 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.