Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4001 Peoria AZ 37 48 126 $45K
4002 Alhambra CA 19 21 47 $45K
4003 Nashville NC 8 10 57 $45K
4004 Pyote TX 16 34 28 $45K
4005 Clackamas OR 65 154 337 $45K
4006 Festus MO 9 14 31 $44K
4007 Mcalester OK 24 10 19 $44K
4008 Holliston MA 6 11 25 $44K
4009 Lanham MD 28 19 50 $44K
4010 Winston salem NC 124 62 136 $44K
4011 Hughson CA 11 34 42 $44K
4012 Palmetto GA 5 12 24 $44K
4013 Scottsville NY 9 22 72 $44K
4014 Burnet TX 7 6 17 $44K
4015 Plymouth NC 6 20 47 $44K
4016 Holly hill FL 10 28 48 $44K
4017 Greenville MS 27 25 41 $44K
4018 Sunbury PA 9 10 19 $44K
4019 Port reading NJ 8 14 14 $44K
4020 La salle IL 7 17 19 $44K
4021 Medford OR 140 281 449 $44K
4022 Ridgeland MS 34 16 36 $44K
4023 Fishersville VA 13 27 35 $44K
4024 Friant CA 5 18 51 $44K
4025 Coos bay OR 65 162 224 $44K
4026 Pass christian MS 14 16 31 $44K
4027 Clarksburg WV 28 27 41 $44K
4028 Caledonia NY 14 38 94 $44K
4029 Lisbon OH 6 14 23 $44K
4030 Laguna hills CA 10 6 24 $44K
4031 South hutchinson KS 7 7 14 $44K
4032 Flagstaff AZ 51 41 81 $44K
4033 Santa margarita CA 6 9 33 $44K
4034 Scott LA 12 14 23 $44K
4035 Seabrook TX 11 15 16 $44K
4036 Calverton NY 10 14 21 $44K
4037 Cedar hill TX 25 9 28 $44K
4038 Willow grove PA 13 24 38 $44K
4039 Charleston SC 160 172 131 $44K
4040 Wind gap PA 6 15 41 $44K
4041 South hadley MA 9 6 12 $44K
4042 Salem MO 5 6 14 $44K
4043 Somers CT 6 31 66 $44K
4044 Rye NY 7 15 46 $44K
4045 Shortsville NY 8 24 70 $43K
4046 Carbondale IL 15 15 29 $43K
4047 Hearne TX 5 10 18 $43K
4048 Roseland NJ 10 13 17 $43K
4049 Georgetown MA 8 14 33 $43K
4050 Klamath falls OR 83 210 384 $43K
4051 Verona PA 11 18 49 $43K
4052 Abington MA 8 14 33 $43K
4053 Eden prairie MN 35 52 89 $43K
4054 Woodbridge CT 6 21 96 $43K
4055 Ceiba PR 8 22 36 $43K
4056 Amesbury MA 10 16 33 $43K
4057 Shannon MS 6 11 18 $43K
4058 Bloomington MN 23 46 85 $43K
4059 Tooele UT 34 59 80 $43K
4060 Placentia CA 24 6 26 $43K
4061 Wisconsin dells WI 15 10 16 $43K
4062 Villalba PR 8 15 55 $43K
4063 Beacon NY 12 42 68 $43K
4064 Bloomington IN 71 84 82 $43K
4065 Springdale OH 6 13 44 $43K
4066 Hurst TX 21 15 32 $43K
4067 Manistique MI 12 33 56 $43K
4068 Trinity AL 5 13 16 $43K
4069 Hugoton KS 8 13 8 $43K
4070 Corfu NY 11 14 22 $43K
4071 Hampstead MD 6 11 109 $43K
4072 Woodhaven MI 11 30 49 $43K
4073 Highland NY 14 20 61 $43K
4074 Greenfield MA 13 12 30 $43K
4075 Penuelas PR 19 45 52 $43K
4076 Marathon NY 13 31 99 $43K
4077 Fairway KS 6 12 19 $43K
4078 Ashland ME 6 16 44 $43K
4079 Pleasant hill MO 7 12 14 $43K
4080 Madisonville KY 12 10 42 $43K
4081 Lake city MN 6 13 34 $43K
4082 Altoona WI 10 20 34 $43K
4083 Brookville OH 5 10 37 $43K
4084 Scott city KS 8 10 21 $43K
4085 Baldwin city KS 5 6 31 $43K
4086 New canaan CT 9 27 113 $43K
4087 New martinsville WV 7 14 90 $43K
4088 Oakley CA 18 21 31 $43K
4089 Coxsackie NY 13 27 50 $43K
4090 Grass valley CA 15 39 36 $43K
4091 Brewer ME 18 27 32 $43K
4092 Castleton on hudson NY 8 10 10 $43K
4093 Kerrville TX 17 13 48 $43K
4094 Apple creek OH 8 19 32 $43K
4095 Wolcott CT 6 24 142 $43K
4096 Lindenhurst NY 26 24 98 $43K
4097 Midland city AL 9 12 31 $42K
4098 Rossville GA 6 13 20 $42K
4099 Inlet beach FL 8 8 12 $42K
4100 Clay center KS 5 8 20 $42K
← Previous Page 41 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.