Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4001 Hugoton KS 8 13 8 $43K
4002 Corfu NY 11 14 22 $43K
4003 Hampstead MD 6 11 109 $43K
4004 Woodhaven MI 11 30 49 $43K
4005 Highland NY 14 20 61 $43K
4006 Penuelas PR 19 45 52 $43K
4007 Marathon NY 12 29 97 $43K
4008 Fairway KS 6 12 19 $43K
4009 Ashland ME 6 16 44 $43K
4010 Pleasant hill MO 7 12 14 $43K
4011 Madisonville KY 12 10 42 $43K
4012 Lake city MN 6 13 34 $43K
4013 Altoona WI 9 18 34 $43K
4014 Brookville OH 5 10 37 $43K
4015 Scott city KS 8 10 21 $43K
4016 Baldwin city KS 5 6 31 $43K
4017 North chicago IL 10 32 65 $43K
4018 New martinsville WV 7 14 90 $43K
4019 Oakley CA 18 21 31 $43K
4020 Coxsackie NY 12 24 50 $43K
4021 Brewer ME 18 27 32 $43K
4022 Castleton on hudson NY 8 8 10 $43K
4023 Kerrville TX 16 13 48 $43K
4024 Canfield OH 10 20 46 $43K
4025 Apple creek OH 8 19 32 $43K
4026 Fremont MI 16 31 77 $43K
4027 Lindenhurst NY 26 24 98 $43K
4028 Midland city AL 9 12 31 $42K
4029 Rossville GA 6 13 20 $42K
4030 Inlet beach FL 8 8 12 $42K
4031 Clay center KS 5 8 20 $42K
4032 Milwaukie OR 47 112 261 $42K
4033 Camden SC 14 12 76 $42K
4034 Greenvale NY 7 2 18 $42K
4035 Marblehead MA 5 8 13 $42K
4036 Logan UT 31 74 86 $42K
4037 Atlanta TX 5 6 9 $42K
4038 Essexville MI 17 42 94 $42K
4039 South lake tahoe CA 5 11 34 $42K
4040 Aiken SC 42 52 82 $42K
4041 Manistique MI 12 32 53 $42K
4042 Pulaski NY 39 106 191 $42K
4043 Lewiston woodville NC 6 13 32 $42K
4044 Mckenzie TN 7 16 114 $42K
4045 Parsons TN 15 34 141 $42K
4046 Assumption IL 5 15 48 $42K
4047 Baxter springs KS 7 9 20 $42K
4048 Newburgh IN 18 28 23 $42K
4049 Clint TX 9 9 17 $42K
4050 Far rockaway NY 22 41 55 $42K
4051 Claremont CA 12 15 20 $42K
4052 Westford MA 6 9 41 $42K
4053 Oskaloosa IA 10 17 46 $42K
4054 Hayden ID 27 23 34 $42K
4055 Amanda OH 5 9 15 $42K
4056 Massena NY 17 49 149 $42K
4057 Lucedale MS 21 7 30 $42K
4058 Robstown TX 21 18 45 $42K
4059 Hart MI 6 12 28 $42K
4060 Loma linda CA 10 20 41 $42K
4061 Morrisville VT 14 22 47 $42K
4062 Sandpoint ID 12 18 42 $42K
4063 National park NJ 6 13 40 $42K
4064 Ukiah CA 20 31 53 $42K
4065 Ashburn VA 45 24 23 $42K
4066 Hidalgo TX 13 10 23 $42K
4067 Elizabethton TN 27 45 163 $42K
4068 Lincolnwood IL 12 14 20 $42K
4069 Satanta KS 5 9 16 $42K
4070 Somerdale NJ 10 13 36 $42K
4071 Sugar hill GA 6 12 31 $42K
4072 Lebanon NH 12 14 15 $42K
4073 Bridgeport WV 21 21 27 $42K
4074 Norwell MA 7 6 21 $42K
4075 East greenwich RI 23 14 33 $42K
4076 Lenoir city TN 19 17 68 $42K
4077 Andrews NC 5 4 91 $41K
4078 Ferris TX 5 5 7 $41K
4079 Tustin CA 38 42 46 $41K
4080 Herrin IL 13 26 115 $41K
4081 Dunnellon FL 6 9 18 $41K
4082 Chillicothe MO 13 16 40 $41K
4083 Rolling meadows IL 15 12 20 $41K
4084 Orinda CA 9 37 61 $41K
4085 Leechburg PA 5 11 28 $41K
4086 Milford OH 15 12 49 $41K
4087 Ocean gate NJ 7 14 55 $41K
4088 Muenster TX 5 8 18 $41K
4089 Anthony KS 10 24 16 $41K
4090 Linden CA 8 18 31 $41K
4091 Indian springs NV 10 27 63 $41K
4092 Vinton VA 12 20 41 $41K
4093 North highlands CA 16 22 32 $41K
4094 Millington TN 20 29 155 $41K
4095 Grass valley CA 14 37 31 $41K
4096 Caledonia NY 13 36 89 $41K
4097 Lewistown PA 15 23 40 $41K
4098 Marshfield MO 10 4 12 $41K
4099 Fairport NY 26 42 93 $41K
4100 Oakmont PA 10 17 23 $41K
← Previous Page 41 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.