Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3901 Savanna IL 5 14 26 $47K
3902 Taneytown MD 6 11 55 $47K
3903 Barboursville WV 17 19 21 $47K
3904 East weymouth MA 8 4 10 $47K
3905 Dolgeville NY 8 33 108 $47K
3906 Richmond KY 22 28 46 $47K
3907 Esparto CA 7 21 25 $47K
3908 Sauget IL 5 12 17 $47K
3909 Homer glen IL 12 8 4 $47K
3910 Gary IN 29 42 48 $47K
3911 Naranjito PR 10 32 55 $47K
3912 Mount carmel PA 5 14 32 $47K
3913 Ringgold VA 9 28 20 $47K
3914 Livermore falls ME 7 23 47 $47K
3915 Northborough MA 5 6 29 $47K
3916 Sleepy hollow NY 7 20 34 $47K
3917 Southbridge MA 10 16 34 $47K
3918 Canfield OH 10 20 49 $47K
3919 Prescott AZ 34 39 130 $47K
3920 Santurce PR 22 59 103 $47K
3921 Milford MI 18 30 77 $47K
3922 Magnolia MS 8 6 25 $47K
3923 Huntingdon TN 27 65 215 $47K
3924 Peekskill NY 22 60 103 $47K
3925 Saint cloud FL 13 12 24 $47K
3926 Paradise CA 47 111 131 $47K
3927 Bapchule AZ 7 15 28 $47K
3928 Homer AK 7 13 66 $47K
3929 Palm city FL 10 4 18 $47K
3930 Midvale UT 33 30 56 $47K
3931 Mercedes TX 17 11 34 $47K
3932 Santa teresa NM 12 20 26 $47K
3933 Leonardtown MD 6 10 67 $47K
3934 Kingsland GA 8 11 25 $47K
3935 Benbrook TX 5 10 24 $47K
3936 Glenwood IA 7 15 39 $46K
3937 Hainesport NJ 14 24 66 $46K
3938 Tabernacle NJ 8 20 42 $46K
3939 Hiram GA 13 15 29 $46K
3940 Woodside NY 29 46 92 $46K
3941 Fombell PA 5 11 20 $46K
3942 Monroeville AL 14 16 22 $46K
3943 Fort stockton TX 18 15 27 $46K
3944 Sayre PA 9 13 15 $46K
3945 Simi valley CA 22 35 43 $46K
3946 Port angeles WA 36 82 181 $46K
3947 Hunt valley MD 10 13 53 $46K
3948 Mount vernon WA 63 146 350 $46K
3949 Simsbury CT 9 29 202 $46K
3950 Markham IL 11 20 54 $46K
3951 Starke FL 8 16 28 $46K
3952 Blackstone VA 11 20 88 $46K
3953 Brandon MS 35 18 38 $46K
3954 South weber UT 5 10 23 $46K
3955 Spencer MA 5 11 29 $46K
3956 Mountain view CA 27 16 37 $46K
3957 Belington WV 5 7 26 $46K
3958 Hereford TX 8 14 19 $46K
3959 West wendover NV 6 14 15 $46K
3960 Mansfield PA 6 5 26 $46K
3961 Pierre SD 7 4 8 $46K
3962 Cherokee IA 8 16 26 $46K
3963 Freeport FL 12 12 17 $46K
3964 Brockport NY 24 38 64 $46K
3965 Cutler CA 7 13 30 $46K
3966 Abingdon MD 9 25 76 $46K
3967 Bonham TX 7 2 16 $46K
3968 Burnsville MN 44 60 112 $46K
3969 Loves park IL 19 29 30 $46K
3970 Saint charles MI 5 13 65 $46K
3971 Maryville IL 7 19 43 $46K
3972 Pleasantville NY 11 15 16 $46K
3973 Salem WI 5 6 7 $46K
3974 Cuba MO 10 11 29 $46K
3975 Shaw a f b SC 15 39 59 $46K
3976 Ontario OR 12 25 82 $46K
3977 Sumner WA 38 81 224 $45K
3978 Nevada IA 11 21 93 $45K
3979 Bixby OK 17 26 18 $45K
3980 Lackawanna NY 10 23 38 $45K
3981 Orwell OH 5 8 38 $45K
3982 National park NJ 7 15 46 $45K
3983 Bluffdale UT 5 11 49 $45K
3984 Netcong NJ 6 14 38 $45K
3985 Battle ground WA 12 20 94 $45K
3986 Mercer PA 9 15 32 $45K
3987 Hood river OR 61 162 461 $45K
3988 North clarendon VT 7 15 25 $45K
3989 Gibson city IL 8 12 25 $45K
3990 Owego NY 15 48 150 $45K
3991 Logan UT 34 78 94 $45K
3992 Jasper TX 5 4 12 $45K
3993 Greenacres WA 6 14 33 $45K
3994 Amargosa valley NV 5 8 20 $45K
3995 Pleasant grove CA 5 10 20 $45K
3996 Olyphant PA 6 11 42 $45K
3997 Glenrock WY 5 6 12 $45K
3998 Coamo PR 17 27 73 $45K
3999 Avalon NJ 6 15 35 $45K
4000 Belen NM 12 20 34 $45K
← Previous Page 40 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.