Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3801 Lynden WA 32 77 171 $49K
3802 Wamego KS 8 8 24 $49K
3803 Conneautville PA 5 13 43 $49K
3804 Fishersville VA 13 27 35 $49K
3805 Casa grande AZ 21 23 74 $49K
3806 Brownstown township MI 8 19 66 $49K
3807 East liberty OH 6 12 18 $49K
3808 Richmond IN 11 14 58 $49K
3809 Quitman GA 5 6 46 $49K
3810 Northfield MN 11 19 63 $48K
3811 Hanover MA 11 15 31 $48K
3812 El reno OK 9 8 17 $48K
3813 Tumwater WA 34 78 198 $48K
3814 Fredericktown OH 5 8 65 $48K
3815 Milford MA 14 14 27 $48K
3816 Destin FL 22 9 16 $48K
3817 Beaufort NC 7 13 45 $48K
3818 Fortuna CA 9 31 58 $48K
3819 Ponte vedra FL 11 13 12 $48K
3820 Paw paw MI 26 50 130 $48K
3821 Marathon FL 12 8 14 $48K
3822 Saint marys KS 6 8 13 $48K
3823 Louisville MS 9 11 24 $48K
3824 Sunnyside WA 24 54 153 $48K
3825 Winnfield LA 5 6 9 $48K
3826 Hudsonville MI 20 36 142 $48K
3827 Grand ronde OR 9 23 55 $48K
3828 Cleveland MS 11 11 27 $48K
3829 Emeryville CA 13 23 33 $48K
3830 Newport TN 21 48 188 $48K
3831 Fallbrook CA 16 25 62 $48K
3832 29 palms CA 7 22 72 $48K
3833 Glenwood springs CO 9 11 17 $48K
3834 Norton KS 7 9 22 $48K
3835 Butte MT 23 48 50 $48K
3836 Lares PR 28 45 74 $48K
3837 Okeechobee FL 17 5 35 $48K
3838 Terre haute IN 37 61 76 $48K
3839 Mammoth lakes CA 7 31 34 $48K
3840 Fort bragg CA 6 10 12 $48K
3841 Alhambra CA 19 21 47 $48K
3842 Evanston WY 10 9 136 $48K
3843 Mattawan MI 21 42 152 $48K
3844 Muskego WI 9 18 29 $48K
3845 Newport ME 7 13 31 $48K
3846 Hays KS 14 14 31 $48K
3847 Murray UT 26 41 71 $48K
3848 Taneytown MD 6 11 55 $47K
3849 Barboursville WV 16 19 21 $47K
3850 East weymouth MA 8 4 10 $47K
3851 Dolgeville NY 8 33 108 $47K
3852 Richmond KY 22 28 46 $47K
3853 Esparto CA 7 21 25 $47K
3854 Homer glen IL 12 8 4 $47K
3855 Gary IN 29 41 47 $47K
3856 Naranjito PR 10 31 55 $47K
3857 Morton MS 9 12 22 $47K
3858 Mount carmel PA 5 14 32 $47K
3859 Northborough MA 5 6 29 $47K
3860 Sleepy hollow NY 7 20 34 $47K
3861 Santurce PR 22 59 103 $47K
3862 Logansport IN 11 17 17 $47K
3863 Milford MI 18 30 77 $47K
3864 Magnolia MS 8 6 25 $47K
3865 Huntingdon TN 23 54 193 $47K
3866 Peekskill NY 22 60 103 $47K
3867 Saint cloud FL 13 12 23 $47K
3868 Bapchule AZ 7 14 28 $47K
3869 Homer AK 7 13 66 $47K
3870 Palm city FL 10 4 18 $47K
3871 Midvale UT 33 30 56 $47K
3872 Mercedes TX 16 11 34 $47K
3873 Santa teresa NM 12 20 25 $47K
3874 Leonardtown MD 6 10 67 $47K
3875 Loudon TN 14 22 113 $47K
3876 Kingsland GA 8 11 25 $47K
3877 Kirkwood MO 5 13 9 $47K
3878 Benbrook TX 5 10 24 $47K
3879 Glenwood IA 7 15 39 $46K
3880 Hainesport NJ 14 24 66 $46K
3881 Tabernacle NJ 8 20 42 $46K
3882 Huntsville TX 15 15 14 $46K
3883 Buckhannon WV 16 14 16 $46K
3884 Woodside NY 29 46 92 $46K
3885 Glendale AZ 75 46 112 $46K
3886 Monroeville AL 14 16 22 $46K
3887 Fort stockton TX 18 15 27 $46K
3888 Sayre PA 8 11 15 $46K
3889 Port angeles WA 36 82 181 $46K
3890 Hunt valley MD 10 12 53 $46K
3891 Mount vernon WA 63 146 350 $46K
3892 Bedford VA 22 44 67 $46K
3893 Simsbury CT 9 29 202 $46K
3894 Markham IL 11 20 54 $46K
3895 Starke FL 8 16 28 $46K
3896 Blackstone VA 11 20 88 $46K
3897 Brandon MS 35 18 38 $46K
3898 South weber UT 5 10 23 $46K
3899 Belington WV 5 7 26 $46K
3900 Hereford TX 8 14 19 $46K
← Previous Page 39 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.