Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
4501 Shelbyville IL 7 15 34 $33K
4502 Robesonia PA 5 7 11 $33K
4503 Wenonah NJ 9 22 41 $33K
4504 Fremont MI 16 32 77 $33K
4505 Collingswood NJ 9 13 47 $33K
4506 Linwood NJ 6 16 47 $33K
4507 Oceanport NJ 5 12 23 $33K
4508 Copiague NY 14 9 45 $33K
4509 Clemmons NC 14 20 61 $33K
4510 Prior lake MN 5 7 8 $33K
4511 Linden TN 13 24 124 $33K
4512 Warrenville IL 15 20 33 $33K
4513 Macdoel CA 8 20 25 $33K
4514 Waianae HI 11 10 35 $33K
4515 Horn lake MS 10 16 21 $33K
4516 Selmer TN 19 43 155 $33K
4517 Greenwood IN 19 22 46 $33K
4518 Glendale WI 5 9 7 $33K
4519 Mancelona MI 8 17 109 $33K
4520 Yarmouth ME 9 8 22 $33K
4521 Jefferson city TN 16 36 133 $33K
4522 Greenbrier TN 6 12 77 $33K
4523 New york city NY 8 22 20 $33K
4524 Carrollton KY 5 3 14 $33K
4525 Danville KY 9 9 23 $33K
4526 Keaau HI 6 7 21 $32K
4527 Forest hills NY 21 39 43 $32K
4528 Sinclairville NY 8 21 63 $32K
4529 Ardsley NY 11 21 55 $32K
4530 Groveland CA 7 15 33 $32K
4531 Hamtramck MI 12 22 85 $32K
4532 Carlyle IL 12 23 63 $32K
4533 Dillon SC 7 7 37 $32K
4534 Edwardsburg MI 5 8 29 $32K
4535 Cabot AR 12 6 14 $32K
4536 Philipsburg PA 7 13 11 $32K
4537 Burton MI 22 38 117 $32K
4538 Whitinsville MA 6 12 27 $32K
4539 Dover foxcroft ME 8 22 103 $32K
4540 Windber PA 8 14 23 $32K
4541 Los gatos CA 8 12 39 $32K
4542 St peter MN 5 10 27 $32K
4543 Farmersville TX 7 9 13 $32K
4544 Nanticoke PA 9 17 15 $32K
4545 Colchester CT 5 16 72 $32K
4546 Menands NY 13 29 53 $32K
4547 New stanton PA 13 26 23 $32K
4548 Elk city OK 10 4 8 $32K
4549 Grovetown GA 5 2 8 $32K
4550 Dewitt MI 21 42 74 $32K
4551 La place LA 8 15 18 $32K
4552 Florida city FL 6 8 10 $32K
4553 Newfield NJ 11 15 31 $32K
4554 Shelby MI 8 25 40 $32K
4555 Platteville CO 5 11 9 $32K
4556 Wauwatosa WI 6 14 12 $32K
4557 Chateaugay NY 6 17 42 $32K
4558 Lexington NC 37 43 121 $32K
4559 Hazel park MI 8 20 93 $32K
4560 Sequim WA 13 29 144 $32K
4561 Brownsville PA 6 8 18 $32K
4562 Tunkhannock PA 10 6 11 $32K
4563 Kunia HI 8 17 27 $32K
4564 New paris IN 5 7 15 $32K
4565 Chester CA 10 23 35 $32K
4566 Port orange FL 18 7 7 $32K
4567 Soldotna AK 14 35 39 $32K
4568 Mc graw NY 8 23 67 $32K
4569 Churchville NY 19 42 144 $32K
4570 Trenton GA 5 11 28 $32K
4571 Sault ste marie MI 16 43 138 $32K
4572 Jenkintown PA 13 12 16 $32K
4573 Rockville centre NY 29 26 92 $32K
4574 Clarence center NY 8 6 32 $32K
4575 Union city GA 19 20 26 $32K
4576 Chenoa IL 5 10 48 $31K
4577 Callao VA 6 9 30 $31K
4578 Cashmere WA 7 17 93 $31K
4579 Cuba NY 7 28 119 $31K
4580 Breckenridge CO 6 6 26 $31K
4581 Zachary LA 9 16 22 $31K
4582 East wenatchee WA 34 74 114 $31K
4583 Fort deposit AL 5 17 34 $31K
4584 Gladstone MI 12 34 128 $31K
4585 Mineral wells TX 9 8 13 $31K
4586 Celina TN 10 21 117 $31K
4587 Valdese NC 5 12 45 $31K
4588 Smithfield PA 6 11 18 $31K
4589 Little elm TX 7 4 9 $31K
4590 California PA 5 10 9 $31K
4591 Kamiah ID 6 12 27 $31K
4592 Brooklyn park MN 27 49 91 $31K
4593 St. joseph MO 5 11 29 $31K
4594 Hazlehurst MS 7 15 20 $31K
4595 Chesterfield VA 18 37 44 $31K
4596 Winter springs FL 10 4 9 $31K
4597 White sulphur springs WV 5 5 10 $31K
4598 Lincoln city OR 15 33 62 $31K
4599 Holden MA 5 5 17 $31K
4600 Sinton TX 6 4 6 $31K
← Previous Page 46 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.