Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5201 Greenville IL 13 30 91 $19K
5202 Silver springs NY 5 18 59 $18K
5203 Nimitz hill GU 6 12 17 $18K
5204 Myerstown PA 7 8 14 $18K
5205 Glassport PA 5 11 27 $18K
5206 Medicine lodge KS 6 9 12 $18K
5207 Powell WY 5 5 20 $18K
5208 Linthicum heights MD 13 16 29 $18K
5209 Vergennes VT 5 5 7 $18K
5210 Benson MN 5 15 29 $18K
5211 Nipomo CA 11 12 22 $18K
5212 Campbell CA 24 8 31 $18K
5213 Honeoye falls NY 9 27 86 $18K
5214 Post TX 7 4 9 $18K
5215 Puryear TN 9 21 82 $18K
5216 Sauk centre MN 5 11 62 $18K
5217 North conway NH 10 10 11 $18K
5218 Dolton IL 7 11 41 $18K
5219 Saint clair shores MI 19 15 33 $18K
5220 Star ID 10 13 33 $18K
5221 Warren VT 6 12 40 $18K
5222 North attleboro MA 9 10 19 $18K
5223 Springfield VA 54 30 53 $18K
5224 Mackinaw city MI 16 16 62 $18K
5225 Brookhaven GA 5 11 10 $18K
5226 Augusta MI 6 11 24 $18K
5227 Nokomis FL 11 5 17 $18K
5228 Addison NY 11 37 73 $18K
5229 Shawnee mission KS 5 10 12 $18K
5230 Fairview heights IL 12 27 27 $18K
5231 Livingston TN 10 16 46 $18K
5232 Port townsend WA 12 26 87 $18K
5233 Fair haven NY 6 27 49 $18K
5234 Richland WA 44 73 141 $18K
5235 Medford MA 18 19 37 $18K
5236 Elizabethtown NC 6 4 47 $18K
5237 Hamilton MI 9 15 39 $18K
5238 Atherton CA 5 9 11 $18K
5239 Locust grove GA 8 4 14 $18K
5240 North miami FL 5 4 24 $18K
5241 Signal hill CA 7 4 18 $18K
5242 Philadelphia MS 10 5 14 $18K
5243 Maysville KY 5 12 25 $18K
5244 Ponchatoula LA 7 13 14 $18K
5245 Calistoga CA 8 32 18 $18K
5246 Rosedale MD 22 19 59 $18K
5247 Taylorsville NC 15 29 109 $18K
5248 Northville MI 26 33 87 $18K
5249 Lisbon NY 5 11 38 $18K
5250 Fuquay varina NC 18 18 29 $18K
5251 White salmon WA 7 18 102 $18K
5252 Le roy IL 7 16 34 $18K
5253 Kirkland WA 42 59 123 $18K
5254 Walton NY 8 20 68 $18K
5255 Juncos PR 11 32 35 $18K
5256 Katonah NY 5 8 41 $18K
5257 Independence OH 17 36 5 $18K
5258 Washington NC 20 9 34 $18K
5259 Corona NY 24 12 20 $18K
5260 Caribou ME 6 9 12 $18K
5261 Lafayette TN 13 25 99 $18K
5262 Savage MD 6 15 73 $18K
5263 Calvert AL 8 18 8 $18K
5264 Port washington NY 20 24 86 $17K
5265 Hemlock MI 11 31 39 $17K
5266 Highland IL 6 9 23 $17K
5267 Island lake IL 5 6 12 $17K
5268 Tuckahoe NY 9 15 62 $17K
5269 Glenville WV 5 6 10 $17K
5270 Staunton VA 17 30 27 $17K
5271 Hewitt TX 8 4 11 $17K
5272 Aransas pass TX 9 4 12 $17K
5273 North chesterfield VA 7 15 21 $17K
5274 Hooper UT 5 9 30 $17K
5275 Spring hope NC 8 9 13 $17K
5276 Golden valley MN 12 29 66 $17K
5277 Petersburg IN 5 6 20 $17K
5278 Carroll IA 8 15 10 $17K
5279 Agat GU 5 8 18 $17K
5280 Princeton KY 5 4 5 $17K
5281 Ellenville NY 7 14 63 $17K
5282 Douglaston NY 7 17 27 $17K
5283 Wink TX 7 17 6 $17K
5284 La feria TX 11 6 6 $17K
5285 Pleasant view UT 9 16 36 $17K
5286 Los fresnos TX 11 8 13 $17K
5287 Gaston OR 6 17 52 $17K
5288 Caryville TN 7 18 50 $17K
5289 Puunene HI 5 8 27 $17K
5290 Pine brook NJ 11 5 4 $17K
5291 Austin MN 9 17 33 $17K
5292 Sheridan WY 22 43 150 $17K
5293 Quogue NY 7 14 24 $17K
5294 Adams NY 10 28 66 $17K
5295 Raynham MA 19 15 10 $17K
5296 Shelby NC 42 66 160 $17K
5297 Goleta CA 6 6 7 $17K
5298 Crystal falls MI 10 24 58 $17K
5299 San clemente CA 18 18 34 $17K
5300 Bowie TX 10 5 15 $17K
← Previous Page 53 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.