Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5301 Altavista VA 8 16 25 $17K
5302 Brackenridge PA 7 14 11 $17K
5303 Princeton IN 12 13 12 $17K
5304 College park MD 18 22 104 $17K
5305 Monroeville PA 30 29 28 $17K
5306 West lafayette IN 29 60 54 $17K
5307 Lincolnton NC 25 41 63 $17K
5308 Virginia MN 11 18 49 $17K
5309 Eastover SC 9 19 32 $17K
5310 Iron mountain MI 36 58 93 $17K
5311 Portola valley CA 13 4 8 $17K
5312 Scottdale PA 11 21 25 $17K
5313 Vienna GA 5 8 14 $17K
5314 Keansburg NJ 8 12 47 $17K
5315 Hurricane UT 10 13 18 $17K
5316 Ellicottville NY 7 17 28 $17K
5317 Benton TN 8 16 47 $17K
5318 El mirage AZ 8 8 54 $17K
5319 Oscoda MI 8 18 45 $17K
5320 Tionesta PA 5 10 24 $17K
5321 Bothell WA 31 55 142 $17K
5322 Foxboro MA 6 6 20 $17K
5323 La verne CA 14 14 9 $17K
5324 Belcamp MD 7 17 45 $17K
5325 Woodruff SC 6 9 29 $17K
5326 Harrison MI 11 18 7 $17K
5327 Morehead KY 5 7 14 $17K
5328 Moss landing CA 6 9 23 $17K
5329 Crowley TX 10 8 18 $17K
5330 Parris island SC 15 48 105 $17K
5331 Denton MD 7 14 84 $16K
5332 West st paul MN 5 10 18 $16K
5333 Adams WI 6 6 17 $16K
5334 Ridgefield WA 16 22 58 $16K
5335 Gibsonville NC 13 21 44 $16K
5336 Falconer NY 7 17 43 $16K
5337 Indian rocks beach FL 8 2 3 $16K
5338 Walker LA 9 12 17 $16K
5339 Deming NM 7 5 5 $16K
5340 Carmel NY 22 26 71 $16K
5341 Charlevoix MI 10 12 25 $16K
5342 Rock hill SC 54 65 107 $16K
5343 North branch MN 8 12 26 $16K
5344 Wapato WA 18 37 110 $16K
5345 Lebanon OR 22 58 121 $16K
5346 Greencastle IN 5 8 15 $16K
5347 East berlin PA 5 9 23 $16K
5348 Dilley TX 6 4 11 $16K
5349 Madison CT 5 20 29 $16K
5350 Somerville TN 18 16 71 $16K
5351 Hermiston OR 36 72 98 $16K
5352 Huntington IN 9 13 20 $16K
5353 Holly springs NC 21 31 28 $16K
5354 N attleboro MA 5 12 9 $16K
5355 Nashville AR 9 7 3 $16K
5356 Finleyville PA 5 3 23 $16K
5357 Los lunas NM 21 16 12 $16K
5358 San tan valley AZ 6 8 21 $16K
5359 Timberville VA 8 17 9 $16K
5360 Franklinville NY 11 28 85 $16K
5361 Cape vincent NY 14 45 136 $16K
5362 Northport NY 19 28 84 $16K
5363 Fort mill SC 43 34 53 $16K
5364 Dunlap TN 6 13 42 $16K
5365 New milford NJ 7 14 37 $16K
5366 Saint amant LA 5 5 8 $16K
5367 New providence NJ 6 14 102 $16K
5368 Central islip NY 9 7 4 $16K
5369 Clarion PA 5 6 11 $16K
5370 Sturbridge MA 5 6 19 $16K
5371 Algona IA 6 8 16 $16K
5372 New brighton MN 9 18 26 $16K
5373 Carthage TN 27 58 154 $16K
5374 Saltville VA 5 8 13 $16K
5375 Taylors SC 11 13 43 $16K
5376 Stevensville MI 11 23 48 $16K
5377 Savage MN 14 22 46 $16K
5378 Two harbors MN 5 10 26 $16K
5379 Lynn haven FL 9 5 7 $16K
5380 Port orchard WA 22 48 141 $15K
5381 Sheridan AR 6 8 7 $15K
5382 Fishers IN 22 17 14 $15K
5383 Trenton FL 6 8 15 $15K
5384 Monticello MN 18 28 57 $15K
5385 Chesaning MI 6 11 13 $15K
5386 Franklin IN 10 6 5 $15K
5387 Berlin VT 6 13 19 $15K
5388 Pittsgrove NJ 8 16 46 $15K
5389 Summertown TN 11 25 47 $15K
5390 Oakdale NY 8 6 23 $15K
5391 Miles city MT 10 17 32 $15K
5392 Acampo CA 8 17 23 $15K
5393 Gretna LA 33 6 8 $15K
5394 Roaring spring PA 6 11 9 $15K
5395 Markleysburg PA 5 7 22 $15K
5396 Morrisville PA 15 17 10 $15K
5397 Fort rucker AL 9 10 7 $15K
5398 Rockingham NC 9 6 21 $15K
5399 Amelia OH 9 6 17 $15K
5400 Mabank TX 7 4 20 $15K
← Previous Page 54 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.