Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2101 Madison GA 9 13 57 $134K
2102 Mauston WI 7 17 62 $134K
2103 Luverne AL 9 16 43 $134K
2104 Geneva IL 20 46 28 $134K
2105 Frenchtown NJ 9 22 115 $134K
2106 Danville PA 12 25 74 $134K
2107 Wilton IA 6 23 63 $134K
2108 Newport OR 48 143 218 $134K
2109 Sun valley CA 27 36 93 $133K
2110 Cicero NY 7 11 38 $133K
2111 Milan MO 6 11 21 $133K
2112 Canton MS 22 32 33 $133K
2113 Mount pleasant TX 20 18 28 $133K
2114 Whippany NJ 12 14 42 $133K
2115 Dayville CT 12 29 102 $132K
2116 Glendale heights IL 18 31 60 $132K
2117 South el monte CA 77 29 72 $132K
2118 Navarre OH 5 14 38 $132K
2119 Waltham MA 46 43 68 $132K
2120 Ridgeway VA 17 34 73 $132K
2121 Endicott NY 51 117 332 $132K
2122 Wailuku HI 38 49 132 $132K
2123 Dickinson ND 24 40 68 $132K
2124 Bethel CT 11 44 186 $132K
2125 Kettleman city CA 10 24 24 $132K
2126 Avon lake OH 14 28 77 $132K
2127 Delran NJ 8 29 81 $132K
2128 North richland hills TX 39 30 76 $132K
2129 Houlton ME 8 23 58 $131K
2130 Elk grove CA 71 66 127 $131K
2131 New richmond WI 9 14 48 $131K
2132 Ventnor city NJ 6 22 63 $131K
2133 Ionia MI 33 78 158 $131K
2134 Deptford NJ 21 30 65 $131K
2135 Chatsworth CA 30 41 116 $131K
2136 Essex junction VT 29 37 87 $131K
2137 Chester NY 25 54 132 $131K
2138 Thomasville AL 13 35 54 $131K
2139 Pflugerville TX 33 34 60 $131K
2140 Hampden ME 8 26 57 $131K
2141 Van buren AR 19 13 26 $131K
2142 Henderson KY 8 23 82 $130K
2143 Centerville OH 18 35 46 $130K
2144 Magnolia TX 36 40 69 $130K
2145 Fredericksburg PA 9 22 27 $130K
2146 Middleboro MA 19 44 76 $130K
2147 Lansing IL 17 24 44 $130K
2148 Haddonfield NJ 9 19 86 $130K
2149 Bel air MD 38 84 231 $130K
2150 Valley center CA 8 14 37 $130K
2151 Dunellen NJ 8 15 60 $130K
2152 Whittier CA 51 61 153 $130K
2153 Lanett AL 8 21 64 $130K
2154 Mulberry FL 16 26 40 $129K
2155 Carey OH 6 20 55 $129K
2156 Export PA 15 32 95 $129K
2157 Wadsworth OH 16 33 60 $129K
2158 Homer MI 9 37 184 $129K
2159 Waynesboro GA 10 18 95 $129K
2160 Union city NJ 27 28 91 $129K
2161 Oradell NJ 8 10 40 $129K
2162 Winchester TN 18 40 194 $128K
2163 Tuckerton NJ 10 17 60 $128K
2164 Colton CA 31 69 100 $128K
2165 Bristol VA 32 47 93 $128K
2166 Kane PA 5 15 67 $128K
2167 Quakertown PA 32 54 84 $128K
2168 Maryland heights MO 29 37 91 $128K
2169 Wolfforth TX 15 16 42 $128K
2170 Niles MI 35 67 171 $128K
2171 Provo UT 59 84 123 $128K
2172 Monaca PA 16 31 79 $127K
2173 Jackson heights NY 25 17 40 $127K
2174 Guyton GA 7 15 55 $127K
2175 Ashland VA 69 130 310 $127K
2176 West valley city UT 60 86 112 $127K
2177 Milan IL 16 37 68 $127K
2178 Pahrump NV 15 32 73 $127K
2179 Greenville SC 178 176 197 $127K
2180 Leander TX 34 29 47 $127K
2181 Hawthorne NJ 10 25 36 $127K
2182 Brunswick ME 17 31 34 $127K
2183 Harvey LA 32 30 85 $127K
2184 Ecorse MI 14 41 102 $127K
2185 Dacula GA 18 19 34 $127K
2186 Rio piedras PR 35 125 176 $127K
2187 Tamaqua PA 13 36 33 $127K
2188 Winters CA 8 22 55 $127K
2189 Aberdeen SD 15 21 51 $127K
2190 Sebring OH 8 15 91 $126K
2191 Florham park NJ 12 15 34 $126K
2192 Fort lupton CO 20 35 66 $126K
2193 Columbus IN 38 72 73 $126K
2194 Winona MN 34 78 221 $126K
2195 Lorton VA 51 61 192 $126K
2196 Wood ridge NJ 14 24 61 $126K
2197 Hesston KS 9 32 47 $126K
2198 Linden AL 5 13 55 $126K
2199 Franklin TN 82 99 326 $126K
2200 Alabaster AL 19 24 94 $125K
← Previous Page 22 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.