Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2101 Bel air MD 38 84 231 $130K
2102 Valley center CA 8 14 37 $130K
2103 Dunellen NJ 8 15 60 $130K
2104 Whittier CA 51 60 153 $130K
2105 Lanett AL 8 21 64 $130K
2106 Colton CA 30 67 100 $129K
2107 Mulberry FL 16 25 39 $129K
2108 Carey OH 6 20 55 $129K
2109 Ridgeway VA 16 31 72 $129K
2110 Wadsworth OH 16 33 60 $129K
2111 Homer MI 9 37 184 $129K
2112 Waynesboro GA 10 18 95 $129K
2113 Union city NJ 27 28 91 $129K
2114 Oradell NJ 8 10 40 $129K
2115 Adrian MI 52 125 348 $128K
2116 Winchester TN 17 37 194 $128K
2117 Tuckerton NJ 10 17 60 $128K
2118 Fort wayne IN 133 135 143 $128K
2119 Kane PA 5 15 67 $128K
2120 Wolfforth TX 15 16 42 $128K
2121 Niles MI 34 64 171 $128K
2122 Provo UT 59 83 123 $128K
2123 Monaca PA 16 31 79 $127K
2124 Jackson heights NY 25 17 40 $127K
2125 Guyton GA 7 15 55 $127K
2126 Ashland VA 69 130 310 $127K
2127 Arthur IL 10 22 54 $127K
2128 Milan IL 16 37 68 $127K
2129 Pahrump NV 15 32 73 $127K
2130 Greenville SC 177 176 197 $127K
2131 Leander TX 33 27 47 $127K
2132 Hawthorne NJ 10 25 36 $127K
2133 Brunswick ME 17 31 34 $127K
2134 Harvey LA 32 30 85 $127K
2135 Ecorse MI 14 41 102 $127K
2136 Dacula GA 17 19 34 $127K
2137 Rio piedras PR 35 125 176 $127K
2138 Tamaqua PA 9 27 33 $127K
2139 Winters CA 8 21 55 $127K
2140 Howell NJ 16 16 110 $127K
2141 Aberdeen SD 15 21 51 $127K
2142 Sebring OH 8 15 91 $126K
2143 Cape girardeau MO 48 49 171 $126K
2144 Fort lupton CO 20 35 66 $126K
2145 Manassas VA 100 84 245 $126K
2146 Columbus IN 37 70 73 $126K
2147 Winona MN 34 78 221 $126K
2148 Lorton VA 50 59 192 $126K
2149 Wood ridge NJ 14 24 61 $126K
2150 Hesston KS 9 32 47 $126K
2151 Linden AL 5 13 55 $126K
2152 Franklin TN 80 99 326 $126K
2153 Alabaster AL 18 24 94 $125K
2154 Byram MS 16 13 26 $125K
2155 Lake forest CA 17 22 74 $125K
2156 Chester VA 57 90 185 $125K
2157 Woburn MA 43 32 57 $125K
2158 Monroe WI 9 22 51 $125K
2159 Hollywood MD 8 8 102 $125K
2160 Woodstown NJ 16 25 68 $125K
2161 Ocean springs MS 25 18 36 $125K
2162 Calera AL 15 22 78 $125K
2163 Glastonbury CT 20 45 158 $125K
2164 Menlo park CA 18 40 43 $125K
2165 Marion IL 34 43 140 $125K
2166 Winslow ME 7 25 58 $125K
2167 Live oak FL 21 27 42 $124K
2168 Pulaski TN 23 57 224 $124K
2169 Middleboro MA 19 44 75 $124K
2170 Coalinga CA 25 74 99 $124K
2171 St croix VI 39 84 156 $124K
2172 Lithia springs GA 32 56 83 $124K
2173 Turnersville NJ 8 30 72 $124K
2174 Hampshire IL 9 20 60 $124K
2175 Quakertown PA 31 51 83 $124K
2176 Maryland heights MO 28 35 88 $124K
2177 Winston-salem NC 67 142 321 $124K
2178 Montgomery IL 17 42 39 $123K
2179 Deland FL 41 68 109 $123K
2180 Cottondale AL 9 25 46 $123K
2181 Talladega AL 10 25 57 $123K
2182 Cupertino CA 9 34 63 $123K
2183 Dickson TN 28 52 218 $123K
2184 Toa baja PR 49 97 221 $123K
2185 Independence IA 11 23 83 $123K
2186 Manheim PA 15 32 132 $123K
2187 Mesquite NV 8 18 71 $123K
2188 Middletown NJ 17 28 112 $123K
2189 Westport WA 13 37 106 $123K
2190 Ulysses KS 6 15 19 $123K
2191 Bennington VT 25 48 69 $123K
2192 Socorro NM 5 4 16 $122K
2193 College station TX 37 29 55 $122K
2194 Haleyville AL 11 19 43 $122K
2195 Brewton AL 17 39 72 $122K
2196 Anderson SC 57 56 89 $122K
2197 Ridgefield park NJ 13 29 70 $122K
2198 N billerica MA 5 11 31 $122K
2199 Hampton NJ 6 17 102 $122K
2200 Two rivers WI 9 22 61 $122K
← Previous Page 22 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.