Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
1801 Paragould AR 16 20 47 $164K
1802 Shawano WI 16 32 121 $164K
1803 Farmingdale NY 59 42 94 $164K
1804 Hawthorne NV 10 26 95 $164K
1805 Bergenfield NJ 20 26 86 $164K
1806 Pella IA 11 32 47 $164K
1807 Stuttgart AR 9 17 87 $164K
1808 Mays landing NJ 21 46 103 $164K
1809 Corning NY 34 72 270 $164K
1810 Norton VA 5 12 56 $163K
1811 Hodgkins IL 13 38 47 $163K
1812 Glenview IL 31 38 62 $163K
1813 Waldwick NJ 7 16 75 $163K
1814 Lewisville TX 65 32 78 $163K
1815 Lathrop CA 41 132 122 $163K
1816 Auburn WA 58 124 311 $163K
1817 Warren RI 13 32 76 $163K
1818 Sherwood AR 19 9 29 $163K
1819 Beachwood OH 15 4 16 $163K
1820 Aliquippa PA 25 43 104 $163K
1821 Dadeville AL 10 22 71 $163K
1822 Romeo MI 28 58 435 $163K
1823 Austintown OH 9 16 52 $162K
1824 Port neches TX 6 12 51 $162K
1825 Moss point MS 11 10 60 $162K
1826 Rock springs WY 24 43 115 $162K
1827 Verona VA 5 21 41 $162K
1828 Escondido CA 48 62 111 $162K
1829 King city CA 17 47 52 $162K
1830 Saukville WI 6 18 56 $161K
1831 Sparta TN 23 50 244 $161K
1832 Santa clara CA 69 81 109 $161K
1833 Sheboygan falls WI 6 16 54 $161K
1834 Kearney NE 23 32 60 $161K
1835 Rumford RI 16 25 115 $161K
1836 Mattoon IL 19 37 75 $161K
1837 Westland MI 55 90 307 $161K
1838 Urbandale IA 29 32 53 $161K
1839 Shelby OH 9 18 48 $161K
1840 Plymouth MA 36 54 85 $160K
1841 West babylon NY 29 24 87 $160K
1842 Auburndale FL 20 38 53 $160K
1843 Hope AR 12 18 35 $160K
1844 Macedonia OH 14 28 64 $160K
1845 Portage MI 113 244 358 $160K
1846 Auburn MA 11 15 26 $160K
1847 Longwood FL 32 35 77 $160K
1848 North salt lake UT 56 106 160 $160K
1849 Sumner TX 5 9 38 $160K
1850 Orange beach AL 32 22 57 $159K
1851 Tarentum PA 10 27 84 $159K
1852 Jaffrey NH 7 22 17 $159K
1853 Palmyra NJ 9 18 127 $159K
1854 Watertown WI 11 18 67 $159K
1855 Orangeburg NY 20 43 91 $159K
1856 Raymore MO 17 30 51 $159K
1857 Norwalk CA 22 35 98 $159K
1858 Heath OH 14 23 63 $158K
1859 Morrison TN 19 43 282 $158K
1860 Aiea HI 65 91 161 $158K
1861 Mcpherson KS 16 32 59 $158K
1862 Saratoga springs NY 50 71 80 $158K
1863 St paul MN 82 181 227 $158K
1864 Eustis FL 12 8 73 $157K
1865 Blue island IL 19 41 84 $157K
1866 Glen carbon IL 5 9 34 $157K
1867 Atkins VA 9 26 45 $157K
1868 Orla TX 15 36 47 $157K
1869 Grand haven MI 50 109 259 $157K
1870 Lemoore CA 18 45 67 $157K
1871 Lexington NE 11 28 41 $157K
1872 Okmulgee OK 11 6 28 $157K
1873 Haledon NJ 15 26 79 $157K
1874 Everett WA 137 285 571 $157K
1875 Moline IL 31 64 90 $156K
1876 Barberton OH 19 27 98 $156K
1877 Germantown WI 17 32 135 $156K
1878 Lake lotawana MO 7 13 26 $156K
1879 Hicksville OH 7 13 38 $156K
1880 Valley AL 14 14 46 $156K
1881 Verona NJ 13 21 71 $156K
1882 Kankakee IL 29 60 103 $156K
1883 Anacortes WA 41 114 245 $156K
1884 Andover MA 28 56 83 $156K
1885 Coatesville PA 19 28 64 $155K
1886 Burbank CA 42 59 81 $155K
1887 Morris plains NJ 28 50 105 $155K
1888 Douglasville GA 32 32 92 $155K
1889 Wytheville VA 44 84 164 $155K
1890 Emmaus PA 9 15 107 $155K
1891 Pinellas park FL 28 23 73 $155K
1892 Hudson NY 32 68 152 $155K
1893 Beverly hills CA 29 30 57 $155K
1894 Mechanicsville VA 68 127 216 $154K
1895 Dixon IL 18 37 66 $154K
1896 Greenville MI 35 76 192 $154K
1897 Montgomery TX 35 50 42 $154K
1898 Belgrade MT 22 42 89 $154K
1899 Saint petersburg FL 154 74 162 $153K
1900 Glassboro NJ 24 44 112 $153K
← Previous Page 19 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.