Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
1901 Oldsmar FL 22 25 65 $147K
1902 Muleshoe TX 5 9 48 $147K
1903 Columbus MS 47 51 99 $146K
1904 Bellmawr NJ 10 19 99 $146K
1905 Columbus WI 9 23 95 $146K
1906 Cambridge MA 74 87 94 $146K
1907 Glen allen VA 100 168 264 $146K
1908 Borger TX 12 13 24 $146K
1909 Mount clemens MI 40 85 248 $146K
1910 Breinigsville PA 15 30 34 $146K
1911 Newtown CT 14 28 99 $146K
1912 Yabucoa PR 5 14 28 $146K
1913 Georgetown DE 11 13 43 $146K
1914 Cheektowaga NY 46 68 140 $146K
1915 Belgrade MT 21 41 79 $145K
1916 Groveland FL 14 18 44 $145K
1917 Bloomington CA 14 24 36 $145K
1918 Arcadia FL 49 12 9 $145K
1919 Anderson CA 35 87 108 $145K
1920 Fulton MS 15 23 48 $145K
1921 Fate TX 7 15 43 $145K
1922 Greensboro GA 11 19 56 $145K
1923 Portage IN 16 17 66 $145K
1924 Rumford RI 16 23 109 $145K
1925 East longmeadow MA 13 22 66 $145K
1926 Brunswick OH 16 20 43 $145K
1927 Manchester TN 31 49 202 $145K
1928 New boston MI 9 23 98 $144K
1929 Kennesaw GA 53 61 104 $144K
1930 Bristol PA 23 48 103 $144K
1931 Port aransas TX 17 14 28 $144K
1932 Wauseon OH 9 19 40 $144K
1933 Kamuela HI 26 51 145 $144K
1934 Pearl MS 44 43 99 $144K
1935 Statesville NC 44 44 213 $144K
1936 Vero beach FL 48 35 80 $144K
1937 Belle glade FL 9 11 38 $144K
1938 Brewster NY 26 45 163 $144K
1939 Boca raton FL 100 40 93 $143K
1940 Keyser WV 9 15 35 $143K
1941 Lebec CA 6 33 44 $143K
1942 Parkersburg WV 38 58 62 $143K
1943 Center valley PA 9 15 32 $143K
1944 Schuyler NE 7 19 36 $143K
1945 Hopewell NJ 5 17 53 $143K
1946 Three rivers MI 25 71 150 $143K
1947 Milton WI 5 11 22 $143K
1948 Los alamitos CA 20 32 82 $143K
1949 Parkville MO 8 18 33 $143K
1950 Kent OH 22 26 76 $143K
1951 Barre VT 25 49 116 $143K
1952 Garwood NJ 8 14 60 $142K
1953 Warren NJ 11 25 81 $142K
1954 Vernon NJ 7 14 44 $142K
1955 North andover MA 13 24 50 $142K
1956 Canton MA 30 29 87 $142K
1957 Sylvania OH 12 22 55 $142K
1958 Lawrenceburg TN 22 52 266 $142K
1959 Columbia SC 323 493 460 $142K
1960 Pella IA 11 32 44 $142K
1961 Clearfield PA 18 35 105 $142K
1962 Coronado CA 21 46 140 $142K
1963 Sanborn NY 17 33 85 $142K
1964 Westlake LA 12 23 34 $142K
1965 Wheatland PA 8 28 89 $142K
1966 Chamblee GA 10 25 63 $141K
1967 Saginaw TX 12 24 43 $141K
1968 Mangilao GU 24 54 82 $141K
1969 Atmore AL 14 36 81 $141K
1970 Reynoldsburg OH 28 17 44 $141K
1971 Oakwood GA 7 10 57 $141K
1972 Monroe NC 50 50 276 $141K
1973 Edgerton WI 5 10 29 $141K
1974 Brookings SD 24 42 55 $141K
1975 Norwalk CA 22 35 97 $141K
1976 Macedon NY 21 54 172 $141K
1977 Brillion WI 6 15 47 $141K
1978 Lake worth FL 68 19 56 $141K
1979 Roslindale MA 5 10 29 $141K
1980 Waterford NY 13 35 99 $140K
1981 Cathedral city CA 14 14 58 $140K
1982 Prince frederick MD 12 29 203 $140K
1983 Eaton rapids MI 11 35 118 $140K
1984 Magnolia AR 10 12 38 $140K
1985 Amherst NH 12 16 49 $140K
1986 Roselle park NJ 11 28 123 $139K
1987 Mesquite TX 68 28 35 $139K
1988 Fairfield IA 24 27 114 $139K
1989 Sturtevant WI 22 39 61 $139K
1990 Scarsdale NY 21 37 77 $139K
1991 Manlius NY 13 34 72 $139K
1992 Stanhope NJ 17 24 90 $139K
1993 San juan bautista CA 15 45 59 $139K
1994 Hartsville TN 6 14 83 $139K
1995 Tinton falls NJ 8 20 41 $138K
1996 Big spring TX 27 30 37 $138K
1997 Lincolnshire IL 12 15 31 $138K
1998 Sparta WI 13 21 47 $138K
1999 Windsor locks CT 21 50 173 $138K
2000 Lehi UT 59 71 112 $138K
← Previous Page 20 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.