Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5901 Agana GU 8 15 19 $9K
5902 Naval base GU 5 10 13 $9K
5903 Moscow ID 14 22 6 $9K
5904 Hastings MN 14 18 21 $9K
5905 Saint rose LA 8 4 3 $9K
5906 Ocotillo CA 6 34 39 $9K
5907 Sutton WV 5 3 9 $9K
5908 Broken bow NE 5 4 2 $9K
5909 Burien WA 6 10 19 $9K
5910 Lyons IL 7 5 21 $8K
5911 Tarboro NC 7 8 14 $8K
5912 Four oaks NC 11 10 25 $8K
5913 Warsaw VA 13 33 126 $8K
5914 Lanai city HI 6 10 16 $8K
5915 Rumson NJ 5 12 42 $8K
5916 Le grand CA 10 31 27 $8K
5917 Berne IN 6 6 26 $8K
5918 Graham TX 14 3 6 $8K
5919 Pleasant hill CA 14 13 13 $8K
5920 East rochester NY 6 15 31 $8K
5921 Portales NM 10 10 37 $8K
5922 Tawas city MI 5 11 23 $8K
5923 Corydon IN 5 7 4 $8K
5924 Paynesville MN 5 8 17 $8K
5925 Sierra vista AZ 18 20 25 $8K
5926 Indianola MS 20 8 3 $8K
5927 Duncan SC 12 11 31 $8K
5928 El campo TX 15 8 6 $8K
5929 Mountain home TN 8 19 21 $8K
5930 Roseville MN 16 24 24 $8K
5931 Fort buchanan PR 20 41 40 $8K
5932 Wexford PA 17 8 9 $8K
5933 Hohenwald TN 10 20 94 $8K
5934 Hancock NY 11 34 88 $8K
5935 Pittsford NY 6 14 25 $8K
5936 Sheldon IA 6 4 7 $8K
5937 Glennallen AK 6 14 67 $8K
5938 Millbrae CA 10 8 12 $8K
5939 Chino valley AZ 5 12 49 $8K
5940 Cheney WA 5 14 15 $8K
5941 Glen cove NY 15 7 27 $8K
5942 New era MI 5 7 15 $8K
5943 Shepherdsville KY 11 10 7 $8K
5944 Keesler afb MS 6 4 2 $8K
5945 Perry OH 6 6 33 $8K
5946 Edgewood MD 8 2 19 $8K
5947 Simpsonville SC 27 16 27 $8K
5948 Liberty lake WA 7 12 22 $8K
5949 Coral gables FL 10 15 8 $8K
5950 Rochester MI 30 12 29 $8K
5951 Edmonds WA 15 28 72 $8K
5952 Lafayette CA 6 3 5 $8K
5953 Bassett VA 9 18 54 $8K
5954 Lindsborg KS 5 8 8 $8K
5955 Orondo WA 5 12 22 $8K
5956 White pine TN 7 14 44 $8K
5957 Briarcliff manor NY 11 17 41 $8K
5958 Minnetonka MN 11 21 13 $8K
5959 Zebulon NC 6 6 41 $8K
5960 Gatesville TX 12 4 10 $8K
5961 Buckeye AZ 13 10 8 $8K
5962 Iron river MI 7 13 35 $8K
5963 Ellensburg WA 26 59 89 $8K
5964 East ridge TN 5 10 41 $8K
5965 Orting WA 9 20 42 $8K
5966 Seatac WA 10 23 55 $8K
5967 Waterford township MI 6 13 31 $8K
5968 Ruleville MS 6 2 6 $8K
5969 Youngsville LA 5 3 6 $8K
5970 Moorpark CA 11 25 23 $8K
5971 Bridgeport WA 5 9 15 $8K
5972 Levittown NY 18 7 23 $8K
5973 Nolensville TN 10 26 70 $8K
5974 Silver city NM 6 4 11 $8K
5975 Swansea MA 5 8 8 $8K
5976 St helens OR 9 18 43 $8K
5977 Dighton MA 5 9 11 $8K
5978 Erie MI 5 9 18 $8K
5979 Painted post NY 17 41 75 $8K
5980 Moundsville WV 6 5 5 $8K
5981 Ortonville MI 8 9 19 $8K
5982 Robards KY 6 16 10 $8K
5983 Eden NC 11 14 28 $8K
5984 Centerville UT 12 10 11 $8K
5985 Gautier MS 13 4 7 $8K
5986 Glen head NY 11 8 22 $8K
5987 Munford TN 11 17 94 $8K
5988 Barnwell SC 6 4 9 $8K
5989 Sutter creek CA 8 30 31 $8K
5990 Mc donald PA 5 6 7 $8K
5991 Morgan city LA 10 7 7 $8K
5992 Bushnell FL 5 6 5 $8K
5993 Hill air force base UT 5 36 113 $8K
5994 Milford NY 6 19 66 $8K
5995 New city NY 18 25 75 $8K
5996 Nogales AZ 27 30 62 $7K
5997 Candler NC 7 9 16 $7K
5998 Belchertown MA 6 10 6 $7K
5999 La mesa CA 10 6 16 $7K
6000 Westmoreland NY 6 14 42 $7K
← Previous Page 60 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.