Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3301 Waveland MS 14 12 25 $67K
3302 Columbia falls MT 10 23 39 $67K
3303 Albany OR 71 166 319 $67K
3304 Blaine MN 35 66 131 $67K
3305 Avondale PA 9 14 26 $67K
3306 Goodyear AZ 33 41 107 $67K
3307 Hudson FL 21 21 90 $67K
3308 Westville NJ 17 33 88 $67K
3309 Frontenac KS 7 14 22 $67K
3310 Labelle FL 36 4 10 $67K
3311 Fairfax VT 5 13 41 $67K
3312 Kingwood WV 6 10 20 $66K
3313 Wynne AR 11 6 37 $66K
3314 Tavares FL 15 16 34 $66K
3315 Bound brook NJ 16 31 72 $66K
3316 Royse city TX 14 9 32 $66K
3317 Fowlerville MI 29 64 98 $66K
3318 Wrightstown NJ 9 21 73 $66K
3319 Westbrook ME 29 37 52 $66K
3320 Rosemont IL 11 18 42 $66K
3321 Calipatria CA 10 23 38 $66K
3322 Murphysboro IL 6 15 26 $66K
3323 Bremerton WA 52 101 255 $66K
3324 Bremen GA 7 11 20 $66K
3325 South padre island TX 19 4 6 $66K
3326 Wright WY 7 9 25 $66K
3327 Beatrice NE 17 19 22 $66K
3328 Cabazon CA 8 26 39 $66K
3329 Carrollton OH 6 15 86 $66K
3330 Albia IA 7 17 91 $66K
3331 Woodlake CA 10 27 49 $66K
3332 Euclid OH 18 28 40 $66K
3333 Loveland OH 12 11 22 $66K
3334 Willmar MN 27 51 114 $66K
3335 Trona CA 9 35 48 $66K
3336 Baldwin WI 7 17 53 $66K
3337 Menominee MI 27 58 126 $65K
3338 Pullman WA 30 75 102 $65K
3339 Closter NJ 7 16 104 $65K
3340 Norristown PA 24 29 80 $65K
3341 Madison heights VA 16 27 58 $65K
3342 Rural retreat VA 8 14 48 $65K
3343 Duarte CA 21 36 41 $65K
3344 Temperance MI 20 41 152 $65K
3345 Ipswich MA 8 12 42 $65K
3346 Richmond MI 6 13 59 $65K
3347 Harrison NY 7 18 49 $65K
3348 Lincoln ME 6 14 48 $65K
3349 North branford CT 7 13 77 $65K
3350 Holly springs MS 10 15 54 $65K
3351 New iberia LA 23 17 27 $65K
3352 Waverly NY 9 22 74 $65K
3353 Blairsville GA 9 9 35 $65K
3354 Tarrytown NY 20 32 47 $65K
3355 Farley IA 5 10 35 $65K
3356 Thomaston CT 11 32 155 $65K
3357 West wildwood NJ 5 16 70 $65K
3358 Leesburg NJ 6 14 45 $65K
3359 Saratoga springs UT 19 30 60 $65K
3360 Juana diaz PR 31 58 97 $65K
3361 Piney flats TN 12 26 105 $65K
3362 Winooski VT 5 7 14 $65K
3363 Demopolis AL 9 14 17 $65K
3364 Riverside NJ 8 16 67 $65K
3365 Columbus MT 7 10 55 $65K
3366 Hempstead NY 60 70 179 $65K
3367 Gardnerville NV 18 49 83 $65K
3368 Ocean city NJ 13 29 44 $65K
3369 Waller TX 8 11 22 $65K
3370 Denair CA 7 15 28 $65K
3371 Harleysville PA 15 24 58 $65K
3372 Hibbing MN 23 49 108 $65K
3373 Wathena KS 5 7 18 $65K
3374 Tappahannock VA 22 48 179 $64K
3375 Montgomery NY 17 36 147 $64K
3376 Studio city CA 13 11 22 $64K
3377 Freeport NY 34 29 90 $64K
3378 Demarest NJ 7 16 78 $64K
3379 Mineral point WI 6 13 24 $64K
3380 Crowley LA 14 14 30 $64K
3381 Clarkston MI 26 36 132 $64K
3382 Mont belvieu TX 9 17 20 $64K
3383 Blytheville AR 15 23 32 $64K
3384 Milton MA 10 19 42 $64K
3385 Mount kisco NY 16 22 72 $64K
3386 Le roy NY 13 28 66 $64K
3387 Harrison township MI 11 24 73 $64K
3388 Trafford PA 9 15 35 $64K
3389 Grandville MI 34 61 165 $64K
3390 Portland MI 11 24 43 $64K
3391 Uniondale NY 30 45 104 $64K
3392 Columbia MD 52 61 202 $64K
3393 South haven MI 29 48 200 $63K
3394 Harper woods MI 13 14 54 $63K
3395 Pendleton OR 40 87 78 $63K
3396 Hawesville KY 6 39 37 $63K
3397 Warm springs OR 17 51 98 $63K
3398 Andrews TX 15 18 21 $63K
3399 North olmsted OH 7 6 9 $63K
3400 Park ridge NJ 7 11 52 $63K
← Previous Page 34 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.