Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2701 Blasdell NY 8 16 43 $94K
2702 Moapa NV 6 17 31 $94K
2703 Monroe NY 26 36 125 $94K
2704 West columbia SC 56 64 172 $94K
2705 Evans city PA 11 20 28 $94K
2706 Plainville CT 15 28 83 $94K
2707 Lyon station PA 5 22 15 $94K
2708 Ottawa KS 16 26 45 $93K
2709 Sharpsville PA 12 24 86 $93K
2710 Antioch CA 34 36 46 $93K
2711 Mchenry IL 21 19 36 $93K
2712 Thorofare NJ 6 18 72 $93K
2713 Lake city PA 10 26 84 $93K
2714 West point GA 15 44 44 $93K
2715 Oneida NY 21 50 161 $93K
2716 Beachwood NJ 6 13 37 $93K
2717 Arcadia CA 31 50 110 $93K
2718 Denton TX 65 37 40 $93K
2719 Lockport IL 12 16 25 $93K
2720 Durango CO 19 29 87 $93K
2721 Lincoln IL 29 63 133 $93K
2722 Owings mills MD 22 26 142 $93K
2723 Americus GA 11 18 51 $93K
2724 Eufaula AL 12 27 65 $93K
2725 Montvale NJ 24 47 40 $93K
2726 Northfield VT 9 19 42 $93K
2727 Delanco NJ 8 21 61 $93K
2728 Waxhaw NC 23 41 66 $93K
2729 El monte CA 43 31 88 $93K
2730 Gahanna OH 6 16 42 $92K
2731 Milton NY 6 9 53 $92K
2732 Saxonburg PA 6 17 66 $92K
2733 Wahpeton ND 8 21 36 $92K
2734 De smet SD 5 6 50 $92K
2735 College park GA 13 38 52 $92K
2736 Midland MI 70 166 267 $92K
2737 Buffalo MO 8 10 33 $92K
2738 Mars PA 15 24 43 $92K
2739 Murrieta CA 34 40 46 $92K
2740 Celina OH 6 11 27 $92K
2741 Mecca CA 25 73 46 $92K
2742 Cutchogue NY 11 6 42 $92K
2743 Mc farland CA 10 18 32 $92K
2744 Bear DE 14 17 34 $92K
2745 Bonney lake WA 28 57 165 $92K
2746 Rainbow city AL 10 13 56 $92K
2747 Scott city MO 8 15 44 $92K
2748 Clarendon hills IL 6 9 22 $92K
2749 Glade spring VA 5 17 47 $92K
2750 Moundville AL 6 11 44 $92K
2751 Bushnell IL 5 14 32 $92K
2752 Andover NJ 7 7 38 $91K
2753 Troy PA 12 15 56 $91K
2754 Garfield NJ 20 34 128 $91K
2755 Westampton NJ 12 24 47 $91K
2756 Lake mary FL 26 26 29 $91K
2757 Shippenville PA 10 30 59 $91K
2758 Richardson TX 82 29 41 $91K
2759 New kensington PA 23 45 125 $91K
2760 Crosswicks NJ 5 13 44 $91K
2761 Bristol RI 23 36 73 $91K
2762 Carneys point NJ 9 25 96 $91K
2763 Midlothian VA 61 68 111 $91K
2764 Lake buena vista FL 8 37 21 $91K
2765 Minoa NY 5 11 15 $91K
2766 San rafael CA 28 24 37 $91K
2767 Yankton SD 14 19 50 $91K
2768 Culpeper VA 15 12 20 $91K
2769 Del rio TX 20 15 47 $91K
2770 Palmerton PA 7 18 61 $91K
2771 Santee CA 19 23 41 $91K
2772 Greenwood MS 20 20 87 $91K
2773 Conneaut lake PA 7 13 28 $91K
2774 Shelbyville TN 39 82 253 $91K
2775 Cheboygan MI 12 37 125 $91K
2776 Union city TN 25 60 247 $91K
2777 Schulenburg TX 5 16 41 $90K
2778 Fairview NJ 15 30 85 $90K
2779 Jamestown ND 14 31 40 $90K
2780 Westfield NJ 13 20 82 $90K
2781 Astoria OR 38 81 190 $90K
2782 Torrington WY 7 10 61 $90K
2783 Winona MS 10 19 41 $90K
2784 Easthampton MA 7 10 26 $90K
2785 Milton VT 15 24 89 $90K
2786 Pigeon forge TN 40 32 99 $90K
2787 Rancho mirage CA 6 12 30 $90K
2788 Five points CA 9 18 22 $90K
2789 Northwood OH 11 20 39 $90K
2790 Turtle creek PA 7 21 52 $90K
2791 Utica MI 35 29 146 $90K
2792 Euless TX 32 21 49 $89K
2793 Westmont IL 21 18 51 $89K
2794 Salisbury MA 6 11 37 $89K
2795 Orchard park NY 35 63 134 $89K
2796 Naknek AK 9 25 55 $89K
2797 Highland park IL 16 29 38 $89K
2798 Palmyra PA 10 21 68 $89K
2799 Nitro WV 13 22 65 $89K
2800 Jefferson OH 5 11 23 $89K
← Previous Page 28 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.