Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
1301 Madison NJ 11 16 72 $230K
1302 Moorestown NJ 31 43 121 $230K
1303 Hasbrouck heights NJ 22 37 80 $230K
1304 Williston FL 8 20 80 $230K
1305 Park hills MO 12 19 115 $230K
1306 Fairless hills PA 23 42 112 $230K
1307 Vidor TX 9 18 66 $229K
1308 Pittsburg CA 35 62 137 $229K
1309 Elgin TX 9 7 18 $229K
1310 Middletown NY 60 110 271 $229K
1311 Latrobe PA 42 82 160 $229K
1312 Auburn NY 83 222 504 $228K
1313 Killington VT 14 14 50 $228K
1314 Carthage NY 23 52 257 $228K
1315 Hoboken NJ 39 41 130 $228K
1316 Deer park TX 36 57 81 $228K
1317 Ottumwa IA 24 65 172 $228K
1318 Dumas AR 6 3 30 $227K
1319 Brea CA 38 44 136 $227K
1320 Green brook NJ 12 28 122 $227K
1321 Plymouth WI 14 31 80 $226K
1322 Randolph NJ 17 32 77 $226K
1323 Jackson AL 10 22 62 $226K
1324 Pemberton NJ 20 44 118 $226K
1325 Conway AR 52 40 63 $226K
1326 Newburyport MA 14 26 92 $226K
1327 Cheshire CT 36 72 305 $226K
1328 Tifton GA 25 30 88 $225K
1329 Elmwood park NJ 31 58 141 $225K
1330 Clinton NC 19 16 57 $224K
1331 Lapeer MI 45 109 417 $224K
1332 Manteca CA 57 128 181 $224K
1333 Spring hill TN 27 61 191 $224K
1334 Corning CA 32 82 114 $224K
1335 Nazareth PA 18 31 67 $224K
1336 Elmendorf TX 11 19 68 $224K
1337 Pico rivera CA 24 35 93 $223K
1338 Southington CT 30 53 242 $223K
1339 Chester VA 58 92 212 $223K
1340 Spring hill KS 13 21 56 $223K
1341 Iowa city IA 68 133 138 $223K
1342 Dublin CA 55 102 198 $223K
1343 Manchester CT 51 89 359 $223K
1344 Ocean city MD 53 108 437 $222K
1345 Natchez MS 23 17 46 $222K
1346 La jolla CA 20 25 75 $222K
1347 Moosic PA 14 20 55 $222K
1348 Ames IA 79 133 153 $222K
1349 Ellicott city MD 38 61 315 $221K
1350 Downers grove IL 45 79 88 $221K
1351 Redlands CA 41 95 120 $221K
1352 Jacksonville NC 88 81 319 $221K
1353 Douglas GA 22 51 151 $221K
1354 Perryville MO 17 40 90 $220K
1355 Berlin CT 19 59 276 $220K
1356 North hollywood CA 47 61 158 $220K
1357 Center TX 11 16 43 $219K
1358 San marcos TX 51 28 72 $219K
1359 Putnam CT 15 37 254 $219K
1360 Conshohocken PA 27 38 138 $219K
1361 Bellevue NE 25 29 47 $219K
1362 Crestview FL 21 16 27 $219K
1363 Seekonk MA 14 23 34 $219K
1364 Basking ridge NJ 9 22 75 $218K
1365 Perry GA 12 31 58 $218K
1366 High point NC 92 131 490 $218K
1367 Acworth GA 30 46 116 $218K
1368 Forest park IL 18 37 62 $217K
1369 Coffeyville KS 18 35 64 $217K
1370 Wylie TX 28 19 52 $217K
1371 Columbus NE 30 41 87 $217K
1372 Monticello AR 8 5 25 $217K
1373 Elba AL 6 23 70 $216K
1374 Winter haven FL 46 35 56 $216K
1375 Durham NC 213 207 335 $216K
1376 North kansas city MO 27 55 124 $216K
1377 Beaumont TX 86 63 99 $216K
1378 Broomfield CO 51 72 165 $216K
1379 Ottawa IL 20 50 92 $216K
1380 Land o lakes FL 11 21 33 $216K
1381 Christiansburg VA 62 153 209 $216K
1382 Mission TX 144 33 68 $216K
1383 San pedro CA 34 84 164 $216K
1384 Willis TX 25 31 72 $215K
1385 Pontiac MI 78 144 313 $215K
1386 Orange NJ 22 32 133 $215K
1387 El centro CA 39 68 155 $215K
1388 Twinsburg OH 21 47 112 $215K
1389 Little falls NY 15 36 117 $215K
1390 Ithaca NY 82 232 441 $215K
1391 Palm springs CA 32 60 143 $214K
1392 Stratham NH 7 12 40 $214K
1393 Eureka CA 55 157 210 $214K
1394 Bayou la batre AL 16 46 145 $214K
1395 Tomball TX 47 32 58 $214K
1396 Morristown NJ 37 32 80 $213K
1397 Sandston VA 32 71 137 $213K
1398 Leola PA 15 41 134 $213K
1399 Vacaville CA 55 87 95 $213K
1400 Martinsburg WV 48 52 60 $212K
← Previous Page 14 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.