Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
5701 Exton PA 17 2 7 $11K
5702 Jonesborough TN 9 22 73 $11K
5703 Casey IL 8 16 23 $11K
5704 Seaside OR 11 16 26 $11K
5705 Kayenta AZ 5 10 15 $11K
5706 Miramar FL 11 10 19 $11K
5707 Tiptonville TN 8 20 33 $11K
5708 Tillamook OR 26 66 91 $11K
5709 Charleroi PA 14 10 8 $11K
5710 Tilton NH 7 4 10 $11K
5711 Broadalbin NY 9 27 85 $11K
5712 Coon rapids MN 12 22 38 $11K
5713 Hampstead NC 11 5 15 $11K
5714 Celina TX 5 2 3 $11K
5715 Kingman AZ 10 15 46 $11K
5716 Willimantic CT 8 22 62 $11K
5717 Summersville WV 13 17 5 $11K
5718 Decorah IA 7 8 6 $11K
5719 Kew gardens NY 13 31 26 $11K
5720 Bogalusa LA 7 4 4 $11K
5721 Agana heights GU 5 12 15 $11K
5722 Keeseville NY 10 21 56 $11K
5723 Apollo PA 5 9 8 $11K
5724 Navarre FL 7 2 3 $11K
5725 Norwalk IA 8 9 14 $11K
5726 Ness city KS 5 6 8 $11K
5727 St joseph MI 8 21 51 $11K
5728 Travelers rest SC 9 8 41 $11K
5729 Edgerton KS 5 10 3 $11K
5730 Lakewood CA 6 4 19 $11K
5731 Ridgecrest CA 30 59 153 $11K
5732 Amite LA 7 13 16 $11K
5733 Barrow AK 5 6 19 $11K
5734 Boyne city MI 7 18 61 $11K
5735 Houghton lake MI 5 4 20 $11K
5736 Kemah TX 6 4 3 $11K
5737 Purvis MS 7 2 17 $11K
5738 Seffner FL 10 6 7 $11K
5739 Lusby MD 6 12 62 $11K
5740 Ripley WV 8 11 7 $11K
5741 Opp AL 8 2 4 $11K
5742 Prineville OR 32 66 100 $11K
5743 Cahokia IL 8 16 41 $11K
5744 Water mill NY 5 8 11 $11K
5745 Mission viejo CA 48 17 20 $11K
5746 Corunna MI 8 19 58 $11K
5747 Grants NM 12 6 17 $11K
5748 Canyon country CA 10 15 28 $11K
5749 Medway MA 6 4 4 $11K
5750 Levelland TX 13 6 7 $11K
5751 Snow hill MD 6 15 91 $11K
5752 Hartsville SC 11 6 23 $11K
5753 Calumet MI 9 20 43 $11K
5754 Genoa NY 7 29 38 $11K
5755 Millbrook AL 8 4 6 $11K
5756 Rossford OH 8 15 4 $11K
5757 Brookhaven NY 5 7 23 $11K
5758 Harrodsburg KY 14 15 4 $11K
5759 Mount pleasant TN 8 20 49 $11K
5760 Brownfield TX 6 3 16 $10K
5761 West cape may NJ 5 12 32 $10K
5762 North palm beach FL 9 4 6 $10K
5763 Merrillville IN 20 11 14 $10K
5764 Harrogate TN 5 15 30 $10K
5765 Ludowici GA 6 4 8 $10K
5766 Live oak CA 6 16 26 $10K
5767 Crookston MN 7 17 21 $10K
5768 Albert lea MN 10 19 43 $10K
5769 Hamilton NY 5 14 32 $10K
5770 Sylva NC 8 6 15 $10K
5771 Crandall TX 5 4 4 $10K
5772 Goose creek SC 24 20 45 $10K
5773 Dunedin FL 18 10 13 $10K
5774 Towson MD 27 38 53 $10K
5775 Belmont MI 7 12 32 $10K
5776 Roseau MN 5 10 24 $10K
5777 Brandon VT 6 6 18 $10K
5778 Mill city OR 6 13 49 $10K
5779 Aledo TX 7 4 8 $10K
5780 Molalla OR 32 64 110 $10K
5781 Orange city IA 6 10 18 $10K
5782 Hemet CA 21 17 24 $10K
5783 Dannemora NY 5 20 35 $10K
5784 Delmar NY 13 15 33 $10K
5785 Hermitage AR 5 2 2 $10K
5786 Midway FL 6 2 3 $10K
5787 Sparrows point MD 7 13 32 $10K
5788 Croghan NY 6 13 41 $10K
5789 Scottville MI 5 10 19 $10K
5790 Hammond IN 18 16 29 $10K
5791 Luverne MN 6 8 19 $10K
5792 Poteet TX 5 4 14 $10K
5793 Raton NM 6 6 4 $10K
5794 Ovid MI 6 7 36 $10K
5795 Vina CA 9 27 13 $10K
5796 Honeoye NY 7 19 63 $10K
5797 Margaretville NY 11 20 43 $10K
5798 North wilkesboro NC 9 11 26 $10K
5799 Madras OR 24 57 44 $10K
5800 Bonne terre MO 7 6 11 $10K
← Previous Page 58 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.