Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2501 Riceboro GA 6 23 47 $106K
2502 Eatonton GA 10 10 46 $106K
2503 Galion OH 7 13 40 $105K
2504 Winsted CT 12 41 257 $105K
2505 East stroudsburg PA 15 23 60 $105K
2506 Delhi NY 20 49 136 $105K
2507 Huntingdon valley PA 16 37 84 $105K
2508 Lake orion MI 27 47 142 $105K
2509 Watchung NJ 5 12 48 $105K
2510 Lovelock NV 10 24 71 $105K
2511 Westport MA 13 26 67 $105K
2512 Union MO 10 22 85 $105K
2513 Mount pleasant SC 41 55 79 $105K
2514 Covington VA 20 51 47 $105K
2515 Lewiston ID 27 43 134 $105K
2516 Knoxville IA 12 28 41 $105K
2517 Oak park MI 33 50 243 $105K
2518 Hannibal MO 19 21 58 $105K
2519 Dover NH 36 39 87 $105K
2520 Warner robins GA 28 14 74 $105K
2521 Kingston PA 18 20 31 $105K
2522 Malvern AR 8 16 67 $105K
2523 Watkins glen NY 20 38 161 $105K
2524 Wright city MO 10 26 45 $105K
2525 Marshall IL 13 28 77 $105K
2526 Blair NE 13 19 38 $105K
2527 Leawood KS 38 34 45 $104K
2528 Windsor WI 5 11 27 $104K
2529 Margate city NJ 9 23 65 $104K
2530 Navasota TX 10 13 40 $104K
2531 Mount union PA 5 11 21 $104K
2532 Winfield WV 8 17 23 $104K
2533 Downey CA 21 18 42 $104K
2534 West bridgewater MA 14 27 51 $104K
2535 Hopkinsville KY 18 25 58 $104K
2536 Sunnyvale CA 48 47 54 $104K
2537 Eagle grove IA 7 26 46 $104K
2538 Mount juliet TN 42 66 158 $104K
2539 Chagrin falls OH 16 13 47 $104K
2540 Aspen CO 53 25 50 $104K
2541 Lombard IL 28 54 86 $104K
2542 Spotswood NJ 6 9 52 $104K
2543 Pratt KS 18 28 56 $104K
2544 Folcroft PA 7 10 39 $104K
2545 Shelby twp MI 14 46 315 $104K
2546 Maywood NJ 10 23 71 $103K
2547 Prescott WI 5 9 47 $103K
2548 Wahiawa HI 22 32 76 $103K
2549 Arabi LA 5 12 17 $103K
2550 Hawthorne CA 19 24 51 $103K
2551 Picayune MS 14 10 34 $103K
2552 Broussard LA 15 22 32 $103K
2553 Little chute WI 8 17 40 $103K
2554 Englishtown NJ 11 18 106 $103K
2555 Bellingham WA 137 302 756 $103K
2556 Hanover township PA 6 14 42 $103K
2557 Avenal CA 10 40 26 $103K
2558 La grange IL 29 28 60 $103K
2559 Corinth NY 7 15 30 $103K
2560 Susanville CA 16 44 86 $103K
2561 Forest MS 8 13 46 $103K
2562 Los banos CA 29 64 50 $103K
2563 Aberdeen NJ 8 10 41 $102K
2564 Monmouth IL 7 27 40 $102K
2565 Towanda PA 7 13 30 $102K
2566 Somerset MA 17 31 65 $102K
2567 Evansville WI 5 12 29 $102K
2568 Park falls WI 5 14 39 $102K
2569 Etna OH 5 10 15 $102K
2570 Sutton MA 10 19 48 $102K
2571 Sparta NJ 21 28 73 $102K
2572 Avon NY 9 24 77 $102K
2573 Fitchburg MA 22 29 90 $102K
2574 Hayward WI 12 23 70 $102K
2575 Stanton CA 10 14 31 $102K
2576 Colchester VT 29 31 94 $102K
2577 Winter park FL 40 18 53 $102K
2578 Cranford NJ 11 25 64 $102K
2579 Flat rock MI 11 21 90 $102K
2580 Corsicana TX 29 16 61 $102K
2581 Fort knox KY 23 51 83 $102K
2582 Owensboro KY 44 69 97 $102K
2583 Tempe AZ 137 117 325 $102K
2584 Lehighton PA 10 20 61 $101K
2585 Effingham IL 18 33 60 $101K
2586 Johnstown CO 22 46 50 $101K
2587 Ephrata PA 16 29 78 $101K
2588 Hampton NH 19 13 87 $101K
2589 Center line MI 9 22 116 $101K
2590 Avon CT 11 31 116 $101K
2591 Lowville NY 18 59 189 $101K
2592 Sullivan MO 12 21 152 $100K
2593 Norton shores MI 17 46 151 $100K
2594 Fort irwin CA 34 50 76 $100K
2595 Cedar springs MI 20 37 122 $100K
2596 Tolland CT 7 28 81 $100K
2597 Roca NE 6 6 36 $100K
2598 Oak forest IL 20 31 56 $100K
2599 Fairborn OH 12 14 27 $100K
2600 Versailles OH 6 16 56 $100K
← Previous Page 26 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.