Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,289 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
7101 Oceanside NY 29 10 40 $0
7102 Odessa NY 10 21 52 $0
7103 Offutt afb NE 5 4 2 $0
7104 Old forge NY 6 20 77 $0
7105 Oliver springs TN 8 12 35 $0
7106 Opelousas LA 7 0 0 $0
7107 Orangevale CA 10 11 0 $0
7108 Osage beach MO 13 0 0 $0
7109 Otisville NY 14 33 125 $0
7110 Ovid NY 15 47 65 $0
7111 Oxford NY 7 18 46 $0
7112 Oyster bay NY 10 18 57 $0
7113 Palmyra VA 5 8 18 $0
7114 Palos hills IL 9 6 12 $0
7115 Paris AR 6 0 0 $0
7116 Paris KY 5 5 9 $0
7117 Parish NY 15 35 86 $0
7118 Parlin NJ 10 5 41 $0
7119 Pawling NY 9 16 22 $0
7120 Pegram TN 5 20 32 $0
7121 Pembroke NC 15 0 0 $0
7122 Pennington gap VA 5 6 10 $0
7123 Perryville MD 5 15 46 $0
7124 Peru IN 6 2 0 $0
7125 Petal MS 9 2 1 $0
7126 Petersburg TN 6 18 29 $0
7127 Philadelphia NY 12 42 104 $0
7128 Piermont NY 6 11 41 $0
7129 Pikeville TN 8 9 23 $0
7130 Pine bush NY 6 12 24 $0
7131 Plainville MA 7 8 0 $0
7132 Plymouth NH 7 0 0 $0
7133 Port gibson MS 10 0 0 $0
7134 Port jefferson NY 7 9 37 $0
7135 Portville NY 6 13 42 $0
7136 Potomac MD 5 4 0 $0
7137 Poughquag NY 6 6 20 $0
7138 Pound ridge NY 5 9 27 $0
7139 Powell TN 9 2 2 $0
7140 Powells crossroads TN 7 17 28 $0
7141 Price UT 7 8 14 $0
7142 Princeton junction NJ 10 0 0 $0
7143 Progreso TX 6 0 0 $0
7144 Prospect KY 5 0 0 $0
7145 Provincetown MA 6 0 0 $0
7146 Purcell OK 5 0 0 $0
7147 Radcliff KY 5 0 0 $0
7148 Raymondville TX 8 0 0 $0
7149 Reading MA 6 0 0 $0
7150 Red creek NY 10 23 61 $0
7151 Research triangle park NC 5 11 21 $0
7152 Rhinebeck NY 8 17 41 $0
7153 Richfield OH 7 4 0 $0
7154 Richfield UT 6 2 4 $0
7155 Richfield springs NY 6 20 31 $0
7156 Ridgely TN 5 12 41 $0
7157 Robins a f b GA 5 14 21 $0
7158 Robinson TX 5 0 0 $0
7159 Rockaway park NY 5 0 0 $0
7160 Rocky top TN 7 15 38 $0
7161 Rolling fork MS 5 0 0 $0
7162 Roosevelt NY 8 10 76 $0
7163 Roslyn NY 12 12 35 $0
7164 Roslyn heights NY 8 4 7 $0
7165 Rotterdam NY 6 12 33 $0
7166 Rowland NC 5 0 0 $0
7167 Rowlett TX 13 0 0 $0
7168 Rush NY 6 12 24 $0
7169 Rushville NY 7 17 40 $0
7170 Sabana seca PR 12 0 0 $0
7171 Sackets harbor NY 28 60 85 $0
7172 Sag harbor NY 5 5 15 $0
7173 Saint ann MO 9 2 0 $0
7174 Saint cloud MN 14 6 29 $0
7175 Saint george SC 6 2 0 $0
7176 Saint james NY 13 5 10 $0
7177 Saint joseph TN 10 26 58 $0
7178 Saint pauls NC 6 0 0 $0
7179 Saint robert MO 5 0 0 $0
7180 Salem NY 5 10 17 $0
7181 Sandy creek NY 6 16 29 $0
7182 Santee SC 7 0 0 $0
7183 Saranac lake NY 7 24 55 $0
7184 Sauk city WI 7 0 0 $0
7185 Sauquoit NY 5 15 51 $0
7186 Sayville NY 15 7 14 $0
7187 Schenevus NY 7 15 40 $0
7188 Schoharie NY 8 19 62 $0
7189 Schroon lake NY 7 15 32 $0
7190 Scott afb IL 5 0 0 $0
7191 Seaford NY 8 3 11 $0
7192 Selden NY 15 13 38 $0
7193 Seminole FL 11 0 0 $0
7194 Seneca SC 9 5 1 $0
7195 Severna park MD 5 6 1 $0
7196 Sewanee TN 8 18 34 $0
7197 Sheffield AL 5 2 0 $0
7198 Shirley NY 7 4 3 $0
7199 Signal mountain TN 11 22 72 $0
7200 Simpsonville KY 6 5 0 $0
← Previous Page 72 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.