Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
6801 Dundee NY 16 25 61 $0
6802 Durhamville NY 5 7 19 $0
6803 E. elmhurst, queens NY 5 15 25 $0
6804 East amherst NY 8 6 11 $0
6805 East elmhurst, queens NY 5 20 14 $0
6806 East hampton NY 18 6 16 $0
6807 East islip NY 7 11 18 $0
6808 East meadow NY 30 69 85 $0
6809 East northport NY 7 0 0 $0
6810 East rockaway NY 6 17 52 $0
6811 Eden NY 11 17 40 $0
6812 Edmeston NY 7 10 36 $0
6813 Edwards afb CA 7 17 42 $0
6814 Eglin afb FL 15 7 6 $0
6815 Elgin OK 6 0 0 $0
6816 Elmont NY 33 11 22 $0
6817 Elsa TX 7 0 0 $0
6818 Erin NY 5 10 20 $0
6819 Estill springs TN 5 6 12 $0
6820 Eufaula OK 6 2 0 $0
6821 Eureka springs AR 6 0 0 $0
6822 Evans mills NY 14 29 60 $0
6823 Fair oaks CA 9 2 0 $0
6824 Fairmount IL 5 8 13 $0
6825 Fairview TN 6 15 26 $0
6826 Faison NC 5 0 0 $0
6827 Farmer city IL 7 19 51 $0
6828 Farmingville NY 12 8 7 $0
6829 Farragut TN 6 14 41 $0
6830 Fayetteville NY 7 6 3 $0
6831 Fayetteville WV 5 0 0 $0
6832 Felda FL 5 0 0 $0
6833 Florence TX 6 0 0 $0
6834 Forest hill LA 10 2 0 $0
6835 Fort benning GA 17 2 6 $0
6836 Fort dix NJ 5 4 8 $0
6837 Fort drum NY 6 2 42 $0
6838 Fort leavenworth KS 6 3 0 $0
6839 Fort liberty NC 6 29 28 $0
6840 Fort meade FL 14 0 0 $0
6841 Fort mitchell KY 6 0 0 $0
6842 Fort myers beach FL 10 3 0 $0
6843 Fort plain NY 5 15 42 $0
6844 Fort richardson AK 7 18 86 $0
6845 Fort riley KS 32 6 0 $0
6846 Fort sill OK 9 0 0 $0
6847 Fort thomas KY 5 2 0 $0
6848 Franklin MI 6 0 0 $0
6849 Franklin square NY 10 5 19 $0
6850 Fredericksburg TX 19 0 0 $0
6851 Frostproof FL 9 2 1 $0
6852 Gainesboro TN 9 21 70 $0
6853 Galloway township NJ 6 13 25 $0
6854 Germantown NY 7 14 54 $0
6855 Gilbertsville NY 6 32 50 $0
6856 Gilboa NY 6 17 61 $0
6857 Gilmer TX 5 0 0 $0
6858 Glen lyn VA 6 16 0 $0
6859 Goodland KS 7 0 0 $0
6860 Gorham NY 5 16 71 $0
6861 Gouverneur NY 6 19 69 $0
6862 Gowanda NY 17 41 85 $0
6863 Grand canyon AZ 8 18 117 $0
6864 Granite bay CA 7 3 0 $0
6865 Granville NY 9 16 38 $0
6866 Graysville TN 7 8 14 $0
6867 Green valley AZ 9 2 1 $0
6868 Greenbelt MD 16 4 20 $0
6869 Greenport NY 6 6 14 $0
6870 Greenwood AR 5 0 0 $0
6871 Greenwood lake NY 5 10 28 $0
6872 Gruetli laager TN 5 10 17 $0
6873 Guilderland NY 6 24 55 $0
6874 Hacienda heights CA 13 0 0 $0
6875 Hadley NY 5 10 23 $0
6876 Hamlin NY 5 6 16 $0
6877 Hampton bays NY 6 5 9 $0
6878 Hannibal NY 10 35 54 $0
6879 Hardeeville SC 5 2 10 $0
6880 Harpursville NY 9 22 57 $0
6881 Haubstadt IN 5 0 0 $0
6882 Hawkins TX 5 0 0 $0
6883 Hayti MO 6 2 0 $0
6884 Hazard KY 8 0 0 $0
6885 Helena AR 5 0 0 $0
6886 Henderson NY 11 29 41 $0
6887 Hewlett NY 11 10 37 $0
6888 Highland IN 9 2 0 $0
6889 Highland falls NY 7 18 48 $0
6890 Highlands NC 7 0 0 $0
6891 Hill city SD 7 0 0 $0
6892 Hilton NY 8 18 64 $0
6893 Hines IL 6 16 25 $0
6894 Hobart IN 6 0 0 $0
6895 Hobart NY 6 12 21 $0
6896 Homer NY 16 36 91 $0
6897 Hoosick falls NY 7 12 24 $0
6898 Hope mills NC 9 3 1 $0
6899 Hot springs national park AR 33 0 0 $0
6900 Houghton NY 7 15 37 $0
← Previous Page 69 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.