Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,213 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
6601 Locke NY 7 29 52 $1K
6602 Mountain home a f b ID 7 14 23 $1K
6603 Mountlake terrace WA 7 11 28 $1K
6604 Riverside IL 5 2 1 $1K
6605 Wakefield RI 9 2 3 $1K
6606 Largo MD 6 10 11 $960
6607 Pauls valley OK 5 2 2 $960
6608 Concrete WA 5 11 32 $950
6609 Halls TN 7 14 53 $950
6610 Gold beach OR 5 10 16 $910
6611 Cazenovia NY 10 25 40 $900
6612 Holley NY 11 30 87 $900
6613 Piperton TN 7 21 43 $900
6614 San bruno CA 23 8 10 $900
6615 Rowland heights CA 31 1 3 $890
6616 Ferrum VA 5 12 11 $882
6617 Halethorpe MD 11 8 27 $875
6618 Max meadows VA 5 7 17 $865
6619 Friday harbor WA 8 14 33 $860
6620 Clay NY 5 17 23 $850
6621 Aliso viejo CA 8 5 3 $825
6622 Reisterstown MD 10 14 41 $782
6623 Catarina TX 10 17 2 $765
6624 Bristow VA 9 6 5 $756
6625 Kelseyville CA 5 13 10 $755
6626 Gallaway TN 7 20 40 $750
6627 Jamaica plain MA 9 4 3 $750
6628 Lake city MI 5 2 5 $750
6629 Valley village CA 6 2 2 $750
6630 Paoli IN 6 10 3 $742
6631 Menifee CA 5 2 2 $725
6632 Armada MI 5 2 6 $700
6633 Dundee OR 7 7 14 $660
6634 Powhatan VA 11 19 47 $654
6635 Encinitas CA 7 2 4 $650
6636 Mount holly NC 9 12 13 $650
6637 Winthrop WA 6 13 44 $650
6638 Wood village OR 5 11 12 $645
6639 Phoenix OR 6 6 11 $640
6640 Springerville AZ 7 12 20 $638
6641 Clover SC 9 6 13 $626
6642 Alamo TN 24 53 152 $600
6643 Elizabethport NJ 9 2 2 $600
6644 Forrest city AR 9 2 1 $600
6645 Kannapolis NC 10 2 1 $600
6646 Mauldin SC 5 2 6 $600
6647 Saint ignace MI 5 6 12 $600
6648 Lorane OR 6 15 12 $585
6649 French lick IN 5 7 3 $536
6650 Floyds knobs IN 5 8 7 $524
6651 Merlin OR 7 18 32 $520
6652 Union SC 7 4 5 $500
6653 Manning SC 11 10 7 $455
6654 Chatham NY 7 12 24 $450
6655 Creswell OR 6 12 6 $440
6656 Mount dora FL 10 4 3 $414
6657 Temple city CA 10 2 1 $410
6658 Ridgeland SC 9 2 7 $401
6659 Gervais OR 8 17 22 $400
6660 Medina TN 8 20 50 $400
6661 Kill devil hills NC 8 4 8 $390
6662 Bullhead city AZ 9 17 45 $360
6663 Cotulla TX 9 4 1 $315
6664 Grand coulee WA 9 23 17 $300
6665 Jefferson NC 5 5 3 $300
6666 Jefferson OR 7 14 16 $300
6667 Pleasant view TN 11 28 20 $300
6668 Stokesdale NC 6 2 9 $300
6669 Swansboro NC 6 2 7 $300
6670 Niskayuna NY 14 33 67 $259
6671 Mill valley CA 7 8 6 $255
6672 Watervliet MI 5 7 1 $240
6673 Bryn mawr PA 6 3 2 $200
6674 Cloverdale OR 5 10 3 $165
6675 Hillsborough NC 7 4 3 $113
6676 Little river SC 8 2 8 $100
6677 Murrells inlet SC 18 6 6 $100
6678 Nehalem OR 5 11 7 $100
6679 Ny NY 10 23 28 $8
6680 Adams TN 6 18 21 $0
6681 Agoura hills CA 5 2 0 $0
6682 Alexandria TN 8 22 41 $0
6683 Alexandria bay NY 29 75 180 $0
6684 Allegany NY 12 23 56 $0
6685 Altmar NY 5 20 37 $0
6686 Amagansett NY 5 0 0 $0
6687 Anadarko OK 6 0 0 $0
6688 Anna IL 6 4 0 $0
6689 Annandale VA 29 0 0 $0
6690 Anthony NM 8 0 0 $0
6691 Antwerp NY 6 23 75 $0
6692 Apalachin NY 6 10 23 $0
6693 Appomattox VA 8 19 13 $0
6694 Ardmore TN 7 23 48 $0
6695 Astatula FL 6 2 0 $0
6696 Athens NY 8 15 52 $0
6697 Atoka OK 6 0 0 $0
6698 Atoka TN 10 15 57 $0
6699 Aurora NY 14 43 76 $0
6700 Babbitt MN 6 0 0 $0
← Previous Page 67 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address — the location where the inspection actually occurred — not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement — not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself — we surface the data and let you draw conclusions — but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative — please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address — a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing — it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question — "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" — and answer it with public data alone.