Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
3801 East bridgewater MA 8 12 17 $49K
3802 West greenwich RI 7 13 73 $49K
3803 Sandy hook CT 6 8 25 $49K
3804 Brooksville FL 30 25 38 $49K
3805 Nebraska city NE 8 12 18 $49K
3806 Beaufort SC 44 76 111 $49K
3807 Yuma AZ 119 211 213 $49K
3808 Franklin NH 6 19 14 $49K
3809 Blairsville PA 10 16 58 $49K
3810 Huntsville TX 16 17 15 $49K
3811 Fair haven MI 6 13 88 $49K
3812 Shenandoah TX 5 10 8 $49K
3813 Newberry FL 6 9 11 $49K
3814 Cary NC 75 97 120 $49K
3815 Everett PA 10 23 49 $49K
3816 Jonesboro GA 24 22 58 $49K
3817 Warsaw IN 14 22 37 $49K
3818 Canton IL 9 14 29 $49K
3819 Mascoutah IL 6 15 21 $49K
3820 Ely NV 14 30 89 $49K
3821 Hopkins MN 22 36 60 $49K
3822 Wellesley MA 11 14 30 $49K
3823 Brewerton NY 11 30 49 $49K
3824 Rushville IN 5 5 8 $49K
3825 Carlsbad CA 28 24 31 $49K
3826 Nanuet NY 17 29 59 $49K
3827 Sewickley PA 15 17 54 $49K
3828 Dyersburg TN 30 60 146 $49K
3829 Tyrone PA 8 14 21 $49K
3830 Waikoloa HI 7 6 18 $49K
3831 Ball ground GA 11 21 48 $49K
3832 Malvern PA 18 10 21 $49K
3833 Camas WA 12 23 77 $49K
3834 Heuvelton NY 7 18 63 $49K
3835 Loudon TN 14 22 115 $49K
3836 Shenandoah IA 9 12 26 $49K
3837 Brookfield OH 6 13 39 $49K
3838 Lynden WA 31 77 171 $49K
3839 Wamego KS 7 8 24 $49K
3840 Conneautville PA 5 14 43 $49K
3841 Casa grande AZ 21 23 74 $49K
3842 Brownstown township MI 8 19 66 $49K
3843 East liberty OH 7 12 18 $49K
3844 Quitman GA 5 6 46 $49K
3845 Northfield MN 11 19 63 $48K
3846 Claremont CA 14 17 22 $48K
3847 Hanover MA 11 15 31 $48K
3848 El reno OK 9 8 17 $48K
3849 Tumwater WA 35 80 198 $48K
3850 Fredericktown OH 5 8 65 $48K
3851 Destin FL 24 9 16 $48K
3852 Beaufort NC 7 13 45 $48K
3853 Bonita springs FL 26 17 22 $48K
3854 New port richey FL 41 15 26 $48K
3855 Fortuna CA 9 31 58 $48K
3856 Ponte vedra FL 11 13 12 $48K
3857 Paw paw MI 26 50 130 $48K
3858 Marathon FL 12 8 14 $48K
3859 Saint marys KS 6 8 13 $48K
3860 Allegan MI 24 57 136 $48K
3861 Sunnyside WA 24 54 153 $48K
3862 Winnfield LA 5 6 9 $48K
3863 Hudsonville MI 21 38 142 $48K
3864 Grand ronde OR 9 23 55 $48K
3865 Cleveland MS 11 11 27 $48K
3866 Emeryville CA 12 23 33 $48K
3867 Rolling meadows IL 15 12 23 $48K
3868 Newport TN 21 50 196 $48K
3869 Fallbrook CA 16 25 62 $48K
3870 29 palms CA 7 22 72 $48K
3871 Glenwood springs CO 8 11 17 $48K
3872 Norton KS 7 9 22 $48K
3873 Lares PR 28 45 74 $48K
3874 Okeechobee FL 17 5 35 $48K
3875 Terre haute IN 37 61 76 $48K
3876 Mammoth lakes CA 7 31 34 $48K
3877 Fort bragg CA 5 11 12 $48K
3878 Mattawan MI 21 42 152 $48K
3879 Muskego WI 10 18 29 $48K
3880 Newport ME 8 13 31 $48K
3881 Hays KS 14 14 31 $48K
3882 Murray UT 26 41 71 $48K
3883 Savanna IL 5 14 26 $47K
3884 Taneytown MD 6 11 55 $47K
3885 Barboursville WV 17 19 21 $47K
3886 East weymouth MA 8 4 10 $47K
3887 Dolgeville NY 8 33 108 $47K
3888 Richmond KY 22 28 46 $47K
3889 Esparto CA 7 21 25 $47K
3890 Sauget IL 5 12 17 $47K
3891 Homer glen IL 11 8 4 $47K
3892 Gary IN 28 42 48 $47K
3893 Naranjito PR 10 32 55 $47K
3894 Mount carmel PA 5 14 32 $47K
3895 Ringgold VA 9 28 20 $47K
3896 Livermore falls ME 7 23 47 $47K
3897 Northborough MA 5 6 29 $47K
3898 Sleepy hollow NY 7 20 34 $47K
3899 Southbridge MA 10 16 34 $47K
3900 Canfield OH 10 20 49 $47K
← Previous Page 39 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.