Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
2201 Woburn MA 43 32 57 $125K
2202 Monroe WI 9 23 51 $125K
2203 Hollywood MD 8 8 102 $125K
2204 Coalinga CA 24 77 102 $125K
2205 Woodstown NJ 15 25 68 $125K
2206 Ocean springs MS 27 18 36 $125K
2207 Calera AL 15 22 78 $125K
2208 Menlo park CA 18 40 43 $125K
2209 Marion IL 35 45 143 $125K
2210 Winslow ME 6 25 58 $125K
2211 Live oak FL 21 27 42 $124K
2212 Pulaski TN 23 58 224 $124K
2213 St croix VI 41 88 158 $124K
2214 Milan TN 29 76 327 $124K
2215 Lithia springs GA 32 56 83 $124K
2216 Roswell NM 44 66 86 $124K
2217 Turnersville NJ 8 30 72 $124K
2218 Hampshire IL 8 21 60 $124K
2219 Cypress CA 13 18 30 $124K
2220 Westminster CO 36 46 55 $124K
2221 Winston-salem NC 67 144 321 $124K
2222 Deland FL 42 70 109 $123K
2223 Bridgeville PA 24 35 78 $123K
2224 Sharon PA 22 40 68 $123K
2225 West hazleton PA 9 22 51 $123K
2226 Cottondale AL 9 25 46 $123K
2227 Wauseon OH 10 21 41 $123K
2228 Newport beach CA 33 41 107 $123K
2229 Talladega AL 10 25 57 $123K
2230 Cupertino CA 8 34 63 $123K
2231 Independence IA 11 25 83 $123K
2232 Manheim PA 15 32 132 $123K
2233 Mesquite NV 8 18 71 $123K
2234 Middletown NJ 17 28 112 $123K
2235 Westport WA 13 37 106 $123K
2236 Ulysses KS 6 15 19 $123K
2237 Socorro NM 5 4 16 $122K
2238 Glastonbury CT 20 45 158 $122K
2239 College station TX 37 29 55 $122K
2240 Haleyville AL 11 19 43 $122K
2241 Brewton AL 17 39 72 $122K
2242 Anderson SC 57 56 89 $122K
2243 Ridgefield park NJ 14 30 70 $122K
2244 N billerica MA 5 11 31 $122K
2245 Hampton NJ 6 17 102 $122K
2246 Springville UT 38 73 133 $122K
2247 Two rivers WI 9 22 61 $122K
2248 Lamar CO 9 18 81 $122K
2249 Taylorville IL 20 35 44 $122K
2250 Lawton OK 109 22 46 $122K
2251 Woodbine NJ 9 41 91 $122K
2252 Guntersville AL 12 21 58 $122K
2253 West orange NJ 17 25 81 $122K
2254 Harrisonville MO 19 29 45 $122K
2255 Paducah KY 32 37 88 $122K
2256 Sahuarita AZ 11 21 51 $122K
2257 Stafford VA 31 18 90 $122K
2258 Utuado PR 34 105 164 $121K
2259 Antigo WI 8 19 93 $121K
2260 Universal city TX 11 14 55 $121K
2261 Waimanalo HI 6 4 42 $121K
2262 Denver PA 15 32 101 $121K
2263 Fraser MI 38 83 257 $121K
2264 Gretna NE 16 20 44 $121K
2265 Milledgeville GA 23 16 36 $121K
2266 Batavia NY 38 58 108 $121K
2267 Sandwich IL 9 26 64 $121K
2268 Brookfield CT 11 23 82 $121K
2269 Winfield KS 23 30 46 $121K
2270 Cabo rojo PR 40 106 272 $121K
2271 Old town ME 12 24 57 $121K
2272 Kennewick WA 74 136 338 $121K
2273 Edgerton OH 5 13 30 $120K
2274 East lansing MI 107 219 216 $120K
2275 Amory MS 13 30 62 $120K
2276 Miami lakes FL 8 11 44 $120K
2277 Middlefield OH 11 27 46 $120K
2278 Bogart GA 8 6 16 $120K
2279 Zeeland MI 40 86 208 $120K
2280 Unalaska AK 8 25 45 $120K
2281 Saint albans VT 16 24 45 $120K
2282 Hato rey PR 44 127 228 $120K
2283 Georgetown SC 12 19 147 $120K
2284 Washington NJ 13 21 54 $120K
2285 Excelsior springs MO 12 31 69 $120K
2286 Plaquemine LA 11 26 39 $119K
2287 Tallapoosa GA 10 15 43 $119K
2288 Ashland KY 20 27 33 $119K
2289 Moultrie GA 20 24 54 $119K
2290 Fife WA 33 64 305 $119K
2291 Dexter MO 10 18 60 $119K
2292 Metter GA 11 18 51 $119K
2293 Hortonville WI 9 21 118 $119K
2294 Godfrey IL 9 18 53 $118K
2295 Pharr TX 81 34 66 $118K
2296 Powder springs GA 17 29 62 $118K
2297 Princeton TX 11 14 28 $118K
2298 New berlin NY 12 25 107 $118K
2299 Marlboro NJ 10 17 90 $118K
2300 Alexandria MN 33 63 138 $118K
← Previous Page 23 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.