Cities

Workplace safety enforcement data for 7,244 cities across the United States

# City State Employers Inspections Violations Total Penalties
1901 Amityville NY 40 26 82 $152K
1902 Griffin GA 31 67 139 $152K
1903 Valley NE 9 19 53 $152K
1904 Brentwood TN 21 17 71 $152K
1905 Mount pleasant IA 16 38 62 $152K
1906 Jamesville NY 11 18 112 $152K
1907 Rose hill KS 13 23 42 $152K
1908 Northampton MA 24 36 63 $151K
1909 Arkansas city KS 12 33 53 $151K
1910 Fort valley GA 9 19 40 $151K
1911 Terryville CT 6 31 167 $151K
1912 Mountain lakes NJ 5 13 44 $151K
1913 Nikiski AK 16 74 132 $151K
1914 Morris IL 14 36 69 $151K
1915 Lehi UT 60 73 122 $150K
1916 Bossier city LA 49 41 72 $150K
1917 Groton CT 20 59 169 $150K
1918 Harrison OH 16 32 58 $150K
1919 North ridgeville OH 9 13 44 $150K
1920 Fairview PA 19 62 164 $149K
1921 Pennsville NJ 10 27 98 $149K
1922 Chester NJ 10 17 52 $149K
1923 Brillion WI 6 15 49 $149K
1924 Santa rosa NM 6 16 49 $149K
1925 South boston MA 15 28 65 $148K
1926 Rutherford NJ 13 17 56 $148K
1927 Cheswick PA 11 27 79 $148K
1928 West jordan UT 82 120 183 $148K
1929 Alpena MI 42 101 247 $148K
1930 Rhome TX 9 18 56 $148K
1931 Frederiksted VI 30 122 380 $148K
1932 Parkville MO 10 23 35 $148K
1933 Rockland MA 16 30 74 $148K
1934 Budd lake NJ 8 20 63 $148K
1935 Victoria TX 88 70 90 $147K
1936 Johnston RI 38 45 91 $147K
1937 Marshall TX 23 21 41 $147K
1938 Hershey PA 14 37 44 $147K
1939 Buffalo grove IL 31 36 59 $147K
1940 Oxford OH 7 16 52 $147K
1941 Hollywood FL 153 32 72 $147K
1942 Oldsmar FL 21 25 65 $147K
1943 Newtown CT 14 30 106 $147K
1944 Brookings SD 24 42 60 $147K
1945 Muleshoe TX 5 9 48 $147K
1946 Columbus MS 47 51 99 $146K
1947 Bellmawr NJ 10 19 99 $146K
1948 Columbus WI 8 23 95 $146K
1949 Blythe CA 22 47 59 $146K
1950 Cambridge MA 76 91 95 $146K
1951 Three rivers MI 26 73 154 $146K
1952 White plains NY 88 92 189 $146K
1953 Borger TX 12 13 24 $146K
1954 Mangilao GU 24 54 90 $146K
1955 Atmore AL 14 38 85 $146K
1956 Mount clemens MI 41 88 248 $146K
1957 Breinigsville PA 15 31 34 $146K
1958 Yabucoa PR 5 14 28 $146K
1959 Anderson CA 36 89 110 $146K
1960 Cheektowaga NY 46 68 140 $146K
1961 Groveland FL 14 18 44 $145K
1962 Arcadia FL 49 13 9 $145K
1963 Fulton MS 15 23 48 $145K
1964 Fate TX 7 15 43 $145K
1965 Greensboro GA 12 21 56 $145K
1966 Portage IN 17 20 66 $145K
1967 Wayne MI 25 74 253 $145K
1968 Bloomington CA 15 26 36 $145K
1969 Punxsutawney PA 17 37 140 $145K
1970 Cadillac MI 47 102 219 $145K
1971 Parma OH 17 31 59 $145K
1972 East longmeadow MA 13 24 66 $145K
1973 Manchester TN 33 53 210 $145K
1974 Kennesaw GA 53 61 104 $144K
1975 Port aransas TX 17 14 28 $144K
1976 Kamuela HI 27 53 145 $144K
1977 Pearl MS 45 43 99 $144K
1978 Victorville CA 44 72 235 $144K
1979 Lexington MI 7 32 85 $144K
1980 Statesville NC 45 44 213 $144K
1981 Vero beach FL 47 35 80 $144K
1982 Belle glade FL 9 11 38 $144K
1983 Palm bay FL 18 17 61 $144K
1984 Brewster NY 26 45 163 $144K
1985 Oconto falls WI 6 11 39 $143K
1986 Boca raton FL 102 44 93 $143K
1987 Keyser WV 9 15 35 $143K
1988 Parkersburg WV 39 62 62 $143K
1989 Center valley PA 9 15 33 $143K
1990 Schuyler NE 7 20 36 $143K
1991 Mountain top PA 18 32 51 $143K
1992 Hopewell NJ 5 18 53 $143K
1993 Lebec CA 5 33 44 $143K
1994 Los alamitos CA 20 32 82 $143K
1995 Barre VT 25 49 116 $143K
1996 Garwood NJ 8 14 60 $142K
1997 Warren NJ 12 25 81 $142K
1998 Vernon NJ 7 14 44 $142K
1999 North andover MA 12 24 50 $142K
2000 Canton MA 30 30 87 $142K
← Previous Page 20 of 73 Next →

Workplace Safety Data, City By City

PlainWorker collects OSHA inspection records, citation history, and current penalty totals for every U.S. city that appears in the federal Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). Cities are populated by employer establishment address, the location where the inspection actually occurred, not the corporate headquarters address. A national restaurant chain whose headquarters sits in one city but whose locations are inspected in hundreds of others will appear in each of those city pages with the specific inspection records that occurred there. This makes city-level views useful for understanding what is happening on the ground rather than where corporate paperwork is filed.

How Each City Page Is Built

For each city, our pages aggregate three layers: (1) the count of unique employer establishments inspected at least once in OSHA's reporting window, (2) the cumulative number of inspections and citations issued at those establishments, and (3) the total current penalty amount assessed across all citations. Current penalty is the amount after employer-agency settlement, not the initial proposed penalty, which is frequently reduced through informal settlement, abatement agreement, or administrative law judge decisions. Where a city's totals look unusually high or low compared to its population, the underlying mix of industries is usually the explanation: construction, manufacturing, and warehousing draw more inspections per worker than office-based sectors.

Federal OSHA vs. State Plans

Roughly 22 states operate their own OSHA-approved State Plans, which means workplace safety in those states is enforced by a state agency rather than by federal OSHA directly. State Plans are required to be at least as strict as the federal program, but they often adopt additional standards, use different penalty schedules, and prioritize different industries. Where a State Plan reports its data through IMIS, those records appear in our city pages alongside federal records; where reporting lags or is incomplete, the city totals should be read as federal-jurisdiction-only for that geography. The methodology page documents which states fall into each bucket and when the data was last refreshed.

Reading A City Page

Each city page lists the largest inspected employers (by penalty, then by inspection count), the most common industry sectors among inspected workplaces, the share of citations classified as serious, willful, or repeat, and a roll-up of the most-cited OSHA standards. The most-cited-standards roll-up is particularly useful for local hazard awareness: if fall-protection citations dominate a city's record, that pattern points to ongoing construction-sector risk; if respiratory-protection or hazard-communication citations dominate, that pattern points to chemical-exposure risk in manufacturing or services. We do not editorialize these patterns on the city page itself, we surface the data and let you draw conclusions, but the methodology page explains how each metric is computed.

Source And Refresh Cadence

City data is derived from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Data, published by the U.S. Department of Labor at osha.gov and mirrored on enforcedata.dol.gov. We refresh on a quarterly cadence; the exact last-refresh date appears at the bottom of each city page. If a record on this page disagrees with the official OSHA establishment search at the same date, the official source is authoritative, please contact us with the record ID and we will investigate.

Why City-Level Views Matter For Workplace Safety

City-level enforcement data is one of the few public lenses that connects national policy with the specific job sites where workers spend their days. A national back-wage settlement, an industry-wide hazard alert, or a federal emphasis program ultimately resolves at a street address, a warehouse on the edge of town, a construction site downtown, a meat-processing plant near the interstate. By aggregating to the city, this directory makes it possible for workers, journalists, researchers, and local officials to see which workplaces in their own community have repeated citation history, which categories of hazard dominate, and how penalties compare to similar cities of similar industry mix. None of that requires editorializing, it requires consistently published, properly normalized public data, which is what each city page provides.

The cities listed in this directory are sorted by the number of inspected employer establishments. That ordering reflects scale, not severity: a large metropolitan area will generally have more inspected workplaces than a smaller one even if the rate of citations per worker is lower. To compare cities on a like-for-like basis, look at the average penalty per inspection on each city page rather than at total penalty figures. To compare to a national baseline, the most-dangerous-industries ranking on the rankings hub provides per-inspection averages by sector. Together those two views allow you to ask the most useful local question - "Is this city's enforcement record explained by its industry mix, or is something else going on?" - and answer it with public data alone.