PlainWorker
Employers › TX

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting · Nacogdoches, TX

Rivers Poultry, INC.

According to OSHA enforcement records (2010–2026), Rivers Poultry, INC. has a relatively clean safety record: 3 violations across 3 inspections. See the full breakdown below.

Upper half by penalty67% serious
$7,244
OSHA penalties
3
Violations cited
3
OSHA inspections
#44,812
of 100,495 penalized employers

Rivers Poultry, INC. in Nacogdoches, TX has been the subject of 3 OSHA workplace inspections and 3 citations since 2010, according to enforcement records from the U.S. Department of Labor. Total penalties assessed: $7,244. All enforcement data below is sourced from the DOL public enforcement databases at data.dol.gov.

The record in one line

OSHA has inspected Rivers Poultry, INC. 3 times over 1 year - more than twice a year on average. These inspections resulted in 3 violations, averaging 1.0 per inspection. Its total OSHA penalty ranks in the upper half of penalized employers nationally. Of these, 2 were classified as serious - indicating hazards that could cause death or serious harm. Against the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting industry average of 1 inspections per employer, this runs well above peers (2.2x the sector average) on inspection frequency. For comparison, Jim and Mary Hayes in Bangor, MI is another agriculture, forestry, fishing & hunting employer with 0 OSHA inspections on record and $0 in current penalties.

1.0
violations per inspection
66.7%
of violations were serious
55%
of penalized employers rank lower

How Rivers Poultry, INC. compares on OSHA penalties

Total current penalty vs the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting per-employer average

in penalties

What this shows Rivers Poultry, INC. runs well above peers (2.1x the sector average) in total OSHA penalties.

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement extracts As of 2026

Where this penalty ranks nationally

Total current OSHA penalty vs every U.S. employer with a nonzero penalty

$7,244 Bottom 45% least affordable more affordable than 45% of 100,495 U.S. employers with a penalty

$0–$5,000: 44,435 U.S. employers with a penalty (44%). Below this entry. $5,000–$10,000: 20,628 U.S. employers with a penalty (21%). This entry sits in this band. $10,000–$15,000: 11,165 U.S. employers with a penalty (11%). Above this entry. $15,000–$20,000: 6,629 U.S. employers with a penalty (7%). Above this entry. $20,000–$25,000: 4,205 U.S. employers with a penalty (4%). Above this entry. $25,000–$30,000: 2,885 U.S. employers with a penalty (3%). Above this entry. $30,000–$35,000: 2,052 U.S. employers with a penalty (2%). Above this entry. $35,000–$40,000: 1,483 U.S. employers with a penalty (1%). Above this entry. $40,000–$45,000: 1,120 U.S. employers with a penalty (1%). Above this entry. $45,000–$50,000: 792 U.S. employers with a penalty (1%). Above this entry. $50,000–$55,000: 5,101 U.S. employers with a penalty (5%). Above this entry. This employer $0 $55,000 every penalized U.S. employer, bucketed by value

Each bar is a $5K-wide band; taller bars hold more U.S. employers with a penalty. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA enforcement extracts · 2026

What the Data Says About Rivers Poultry, INC.

The federal enforcement record for Rivers Poultry, INC. in Nacogdoches, TX includes 3 OSHA inspections and 3 violations, translating to 1.00 violations per inspection. Of those violations, 2 (66.7%) were classified as serious, 0 (0.0%) as willful, and 0 (0.0%) as repeat. Serious violations denote hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm; willful and repeat categories indicate intentional disregard or recurrence of previously cited hazards.

OSHA assessed $7,244 in initial penalties against this employer, later adjusted to a current total of $7,244 - no reduction from the original assessment. Average penalty per inspection works out to $2,415. Against the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting industry average of $3,429 per employer, this record runs well above peers (2.1x the sector average).

Inspection activity spans from 2017-03-28 to 2018-02-07, a window of roughly 1 year.

Enforcement detail

OSHA Inspection History

Total Inspections

3

First Inspection

2017-03-28

Last Inspection

2018-02-07

Inspection Span

1 yr

Violations / Inspection

1.0

Avg Penalty / Inspection

$2,415

Industry Avg / Inspection

$2,541

What this shows 3 inspections over 1 year, averaging 1.0 violations per visit. That's $2,415 per inspection vs. the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting average of $2,541.

Enforcement detail

Violation Breakdown

2

Serious

66.7% of total

0

Willful

0.0% of total

0

Repeat

0.0% of total

1

Other-Than-Serious

33.3% of total

What this shows Serious violations involve hazards that could cause death or serious physical harm. Willful violations indicate intentional or knowing disregard of the law. Repeat violations are for hazards previously cited within the past 5 years.

Enforcement detail

Penalty Analysis

Initial Penalty Assessed

$7,244

Current Penalty Amount

$7,244

Penalty Reduction

None

What this shows No reduction on record. The current penalty matches the original OSHA assessment.

Industry Safety Context: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting

How Rivers Poultry, INC. compares to the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting sector, which has 6,046 employers tracked by PlainWorker.

Metric Rivers Poultry, INC. Industry Avg
Inspections 3 1.3
Violations 3 2.3
Total Penalty $7,244 $3,429
Avg Penalty per Inspection $2,415 $2,541
View all 6,046 employers in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting →

Nearby & Similar Employers in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting

Karina Ornelas
Gilroy, CA
3 inspections $7,250
New Hope Dairy LLC
Galt, CA
2 inspections $7,250
Westbrook Dairy, LLC
Dixie, GA
2 inspections $7,252
Butterspur Cattle Feeders INC
Brawley, CA
2 inspections $7,230
Jim and Mary Hayes
Bangor, MI
0 inspections $0

Compare Rivers Poultry, INC. vs Karina Ornelas side-by-side →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rivers Poultry, INC. safe to work at? ▼
Based on OSHA records, Rivers Poultry, INC.'s workplace safety record is relatively clean, with fewer violations than typical. The employer has 3 violations across 3 inspections, including 2 serious violations. Compared to Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting industry peers, this is above average for penalties. Review the full inspection history below for details.
How many OSHA violations does Rivers Poultry, INC. have? ▼
Rivers Poultry, INC. has 3 OSHA violations on record, including 2 serious, 0 willful, and 0 repeat violations. The total current penalty amount is $7,244.
How many OSHA inspections has Rivers Poultry, INC. had? ▼
Rivers Poultry, INC. has had 3 OSHA inspections, with the first recorded on 2017-03-28 and the most recent on 2018-02-07. This averages 1.0 violations per inspection.
What is the total penalty amount for Rivers Poultry, INC.? ▼
Rivers Poultry, INC. has been assessed $7,244 in current OSHA penalties.
Does Rivers Poultry, INC. have any serious or willful violations? ▼
Yes. Rivers Poultry, INC. has 2 serious violations. Serious violations involve hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Willful violations indicate the employer intentionally or knowingly disregarded the law.
What industry does Rivers Poultry, INC. operate in? ▼
Rivers Poultry, INC. operates in the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting sector (NAICS code 112320). This industry has 6,046 employers tracked by PlainWorker, with 8,157 total OSHA inspections and $20.73M in cumulative penalties.
How does Rivers Poultry, INC.'s safety record compare to industry average? ▼
Rivers Poultry, INC.'s total OSHA penalty of $7,244 is above the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting industry average of $3,429 per employer (2.1x the average). The employer has 3 inspections compared to the industry average of 1.3 per employer. For a direct comparison, Jim and Mary Hayes in Bangor, MI is a similar agriculture, forestry, fishing & hunting employer with $0 in current penalties.

Explore PlainWorker

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Industry

All 6,046 employers in this sector
Employers in TX

All inspected employers in this state
Safety Rankings

Most penalized, repeat violators & more

What to check next

Rivers Poultry, INC.'s record is one establishment in a larger pattern. Use it as a research checklist, not a verdict on the employer overall.

These figures are the federal enforcement record on file and reflect past inspections, not a statement about current workplace conditions. See the disclaimer for how to read them.

Data Sources & Methodology ▼

Data as of 2026. Source: U.S. Department of Labor (OSHA, WHD).

Source: OSHA Enforcement Data

Inspection and violation records from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, covering the period 2010–2026. Includes inspection dates, violation types (serious, willful, repeat, other-than-serious), and penalty amounts. Penalties shown are current assessed amounts and may differ from original citations due to settlement, contest, or reduction.

Source: Wage and Hour Division (WHD)

Compliance actions from the WHD, covering enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including minimum wage, overtime, and child labor violations. Back wages represent amounts owed to affected employees as determined by WHD investigations.

Employer Matching

Employers are matched across OSHA and WHD datasets by name, state, and city. Employers included in PlainWorker have 2 or more OSHA inspections or $1,000+ in WHD back wages. Data is updated monthly from data.dol.gov.

Verify with OSHA establishment search →

Every figure on PlainWorker is rendered directly from official U.S. Department of Labor OSHA and Wage & Hour Division enforcement records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's ratios (penalty-per-violation, industry comparisons) are computed live from the 3 inspections on record. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026.