Retail Trade · Cabo Rojo, PR
Puma 646
According to the U.S. Department of Labor (2010–2026), the Wage and Hour Division recovered $1,567 in back wages owed to 3 affected workers across 1 wage-theft case.
- $0
- OSHA penalties
- 0
- Violations cited
- 0
- OSHA inspections
- $1,567
- Back wages owed
Puma 646 in Cabo Rojo, PR has been the subject of 0 OSHA workplace inspections and 0 citations since 2010, according to enforcement records from the U.S. Department of Labor. The employer also has 1 Wage and Hour Division (WHD) case on record, covering Fair Labor Standards Act enforcement. All enforcement data below is sourced from the DOL public enforcement databases at data.dol.gov.
What the Data Says About Puma 646
Puma 646 in Cabo Rojo, PR has no OSHA inspection on record with PlainWorker. An absence of federal inspection activity is not the same as a clean safety record, it typically means this employer has not yet been selected for inspection under OSHA's targeting programs. By comparison, Infinity Wireless - Fort Worth in Fort Worth, TX has 0 OSHA inspections on record.
No OSHA penalty has been assessed against Puma 646 to date. The Retail Trade sector average runs $2,879 per employer. The Wage and Hour Division added 1 case producing $1,567 in back wages owed to 3 affected workers.
Wage & Hour Findings
The Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division found that Puma 646 owed $1,567 in back wages to 3 employees across 1 case and 5 violations. WHD enforces federal labor laws including the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), covering minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor standards.
Industry Safety Context: Retail Trade
How Puma 646 compares to the Retail Trade sector, which has 12,990 employers tracked by PlainWorker.
| Metric | Puma 646 | Industry Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Inspections | 0 | 0.8 |
| Violations | 0 | 1.7 |
| Total Penalty | $0 | $2,879 |
| Avg Penalty per Inspection | $0 | $3,566 |
Nearby & Similar Employers in Retail Trade
Compare Puma 646 vs Superstop 161 Totally Star side-by-side →
Frequently Asked Questions
Has Puma 646 been cited for wage theft? ▼
What industry does Puma 646 operate in? ▼
What should I do if Puma 646 owes me wages? ▼
How does Puma 646's safety record compare to industry average? ▼
Explore PlainWorker
What to check next
Puma 646's record is one establishment in a larger pattern. Use it as a research checklist, not a verdict on the employer overall.
- See how Puma 646 compares to the 12,990 other employers in Retail Trade. Retail Trade record
- Put this employer head-to-head with another on inspections, penalties, and back wages. Compare employers
- Review the full OSHA & wage-enforcement picture for PR. PR state record
These figures are the federal enforcement record on file and reflect past inspections, not a statement about current workplace conditions. See the disclaimer for how to read them.
Data Sources & Methodology ▼
Data as of 2026. Source: U.S. Department of Labor (OSHA, WHD).
Source: OSHA Enforcement Data
Inspection and violation records from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, covering the period 2010–2026. Includes inspection dates, violation types (serious, willful, repeat, other-than-serious), and penalty amounts. Penalties shown are current assessed amounts and may differ from original citations due to settlement, contest, or reduction.
Source: Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Compliance actions from the WHD, covering enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including minimum wage, overtime, and child labor violations. Back wages represent amounts owed to affected employees as determined by WHD investigations.
Employer Matching
Employers are matched across OSHA and WHD datasets by name, state, and city. Employers included in PlainWorker have 2 or more OSHA inspections or $1,000+ in WHD back wages. Data is updated monthly from data.dol.gov.