Public Administration · Dover Foxcroft, ME

Piscataquis County

According to OSHA enforcement records (2010–2026), Piscataquis County has a relatively clean safety record: 0 violations across 3 inspections. See the full breakdown below.

$0
OSHA penalties
0
Violations cited
3
OSHA inspections

Piscataquis County in Dover Foxcroft, ME has been the subject of 3 OSHA workplace inspections and 0 citations since 2010, according to enforcement records from the U.S. Department of Labor. All enforcement data below is sourced from the DOL public enforcement databases at data.dol.gov.

The record in one line

OSHA has inspected Piscataquis County 3 times over 1 year - more than twice a year on average. None of these inspections resulted in a citation. Against the Public Administration industry average of 3 inspections per employer, this sits roughly in line with peers (1.0x the sector average) on inspection frequency. For comparison, Mayor & City Council of Baltimore in Baltimore, MD is another public administration employer with 21 OSHA inspections on record and $0 in current penalties.

0.0
violations per inspection
0.0%
of violations were serious

What the Data Says About Piscataquis County

The federal enforcement record for Piscataquis County in Dover Foxcroft, ME shows 3 OSHA inspections with zero violations cited, a cleaner record than the Public Administration sector average of 6.4 violations per employer.

No OSHA penalty has been assessed against Piscataquis County to date. The Public Administration sector average runs $2,581 per employer.

Inspection activity spans from 2026-06-01 to 2026-06-01, a window of roughly 1 year.

Enforcement detail

OSHA Inspection History

Total Inspections

3

First Inspection

2026-06-01

Last Inspection

2026-06-01

Inspection Span

1 yr

Violations / Inspection

0.0

Avg Penalty / Inspection

$0

Industry Avg / Inspection

$826

What this shows 3 inspections over 1 year, averaging 0.0 violations per visit. That's $0 per inspection vs. the Public Administration average of $826.

Industry Safety Context: Public Administration

How Piscataquis County compares to the Public Administration sector, which has 9,788 employers tracked by PlainWorker.

Metric Piscataquis County Industry Avg
Inspections 3 3.1
Violations 0 6.4
Total Penalty $0 $2,581
Avg Penalty per Inspection $0 $826

Nearby & Similar Employers in Public Administration

Compare Piscataquis County vs City of Portsmouth General Services/Property Management side-by-side →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Piscataquis County safe to work at?
Based on OSHA records, Piscataquis County's workplace safety record is relatively clean, with fewer violations than typical. The employer has 0 violations across 3 inspections. Compared to Public Administration industry peers, this is below average for penalties. Review the full inspection history below for details.
How many OSHA violations does Piscataquis County have?
Piscataquis County has 0 OSHA violations on record, including 0 serious, 0 willful, and 0 repeat violations. The total current penalty amount is $0.
How many OSHA inspections has Piscataquis County had?
Piscataquis County has had 3 OSHA inspections, with the first recorded on 2026-06-01 and the most recent on 2026-06-01. This averages 0.0 violations per inspection.
What is the total penalty amount for Piscataquis County?
Piscataquis County has been assessed $0 in current OSHA penalties.
What industry does Piscataquis County operate in?
Piscataquis County operates in the Public Administration sector (NAICS code 921110). This industry has 9,788 employers tracked by PlainWorker, with 30,564 total OSHA inspections and $25.26M in cumulative penalties.
How does Piscataquis County's safety record compare to industry average?
Piscataquis County's total OSHA penalty of $0 is below the Public Administration industry average of $2,581 per employer. The employer has 3 inspections compared to the industry average of 3.1 per employer. For a direct comparison, Mayor & City Council of Baltimore in Baltimore, MD is a similar public administration employer with $0 in current penalties.

Explore PlainWorker

What to check next

Piscataquis County's record is one establishment in a larger pattern. Use it as a research checklist, not a verdict on the employer overall.

These figures are the federal enforcement record on file and reflect past inspections, not a statement about current workplace conditions. See the disclaimer for how to read them.

Data Sources & Methodology

Data as of 2026. Source: U.S. Department of Labor (OSHA, WHD).

Source: OSHA Enforcement Data

Inspection and violation records from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, covering the period 2010–2026. Includes inspection dates, violation types (serious, willful, repeat, other-than-serious), and penalty amounts. Penalties shown are current assessed amounts and may differ from original citations due to settlement, contest, or reduction.

Source: Wage and Hour Division (WHD)

Compliance actions from the WHD, covering enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including minimum wage, overtime, and child labor violations. Back wages represent amounts owed to affected employees as determined by WHD investigations.

Employer Matching

Employers are matched across OSHA and WHD datasets by name, state, and city. Employers included in PlainWorker have 2 or more OSHA inspections or $1,000+ in WHD back wages. Data is updated monthly from data.dol.gov.

Verify with OSHA establishment search →

Every figure on PlainWorker is rendered directly from official U.S. Department of Labor OSHA and Wage & Hour Division enforcement records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's ratios (penalty-per-violation, industry comparisons) are computed live from the 3 inspections on record. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026.